Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Planted Lynx Fur In Habitat Survey Upsets Legislators bureacrats {Congress can be so easily led}
Associated Press ^ | Monday, December 31, 2001 | Associated Press

Posted on 12/31/2001 5:03:05 PM PST by expose

Planted Lynx Fur In Habitat Survey Upsets Legislators Associated Press

Monday, December 31, 2001 Lawmakers want an investigation into whether government wildlife biologists planted lynx fur in two national forests to make it appear that the animals were present so that people would be kept out.

The Forest Service and Fish and Wildlife Service are tracking the rare Canadian lynx to determine how many there are and where they live. Data from the four-year survey will be used to determine how best to protect the lynx, which is classified as "threatened."

During the 2000 sampling session, biologists planted three samples of lynx fur on rubbing posts in parts of the Wenatchee and Gifford Pinchot national forests in Washington state, areas not usually home to the lynx. Fur taken from such posts is used to indicate if lynx are in the area.

The seven biologists -- three from the Forest Service, two from the Fish and Wildlife Service and two from the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife -- admitted they planted the samples and said they wanted to test whether the lab could identify lynx fur.

The cats, 3 1/2 feet long and 40 pounds at their largest, prey on snowshoe hares. Efforts to protect lynx habitat are underway in 57 forests in 16 states.

None of the seven biologists remains in the lynx survey program. Six were reassigned, and one retired.

House Resources Committee Chairman James V. Hansen (R-Utah) and Rep. Scott McInnis (R-Colo.), chairman of the House forests subcommittee, called that "grossly inadequate punishment given the magnitude of this offense."

They said if it is found that the intent was to skew the study, the biologists should be fired.

"These offenses minimally amount to professional malfeasance of the highest order," the congressman wrote Dec. 18 in a letter to Agriculture Secretary Ann M. Veneman and Interior Secretary Gale A. Norton, whose agencies administer the lynx program.

Some proposed changes to protect the lynx include limiting the thinning of forests to improve habitat for the snowshoe hare and to restrict snowmobiling and some other winter activities. But Hansen and McInnis want a review of all data collected through the program before any land management decisions are made.

Without additional scrutiny of the data, no assurances can be made that the "lynx recovery effort is grounded in science, rather than in the fraudulent behavior of unscrupulous field officers," Hansen and McInnis wrote.

Forest Service Chief Dale N. Bosworth said the fur fiasco is embarrassing but did not threaten the closure of any habitat to the public.

Fish and Wildlife Service spokesman Chris Tollefson said the agency is confident the lynx count has not been tainted.

"We don't believe that there was an intent to submit these results to skew the results of the survey, but it could have compromised the entire survey and forced us to do it all over again," he said.

Hansen and McInnis have asked the General Accounting Office, the investigative arm of Congress, to look into the matter and will convene hearings early next year.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fur; lynx; lynxfur
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last
What is so surprizing about this.

Government bureacrats has always slanted their rports to get their way.

From WACO to Ruby Ridge to clean air act, to U.N. reports.

Congress can be so easily led by these reports

1 posted on 12/31/2001 5:03:16 PM PST by expose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: expose
It was attempted fraud and the persons involved should be arrested.
2 posted on 12/31/2001 5:16:57 PM PST by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expose
"Fish and Wildlife Service spokesman Chris Tollefson said the agency is confident the lynx count has not been tainted."

This moron should be the first to go......

3 posted on 12/31/2001 5:17:34 PM PST by yooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expose
Why can't the U.S. let the Canadians worry about the Canadian lynx, anyway?
4 posted on 12/31/2001 5:19:05 PM PST by Irene Adler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expose
""We don't believe that there was an intent to submit these results to skew the results of the survey..."

Why was it done then, praytell?

5 posted on 12/31/2001 5:20:26 PM PST by Irene Adler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expose
If it comes from government it's either:

1) An absolute, monolithic, bald-faced, total lie.
2) A tissue of lesser lies glued together with snippets of truth.
3) A bizarre mixture of lunacy, accidental truth and lies.

6 posted on 12/31/2001 5:20:36 PM PST by DWSUWF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expose
admitted they planted the samples and said they wanted to test whether the lab could identify lynx fur.

What? They were worried that the previous data might not be accurate?

They said if it is found that the intent was to skew the study
the agency is confident the lynx count has not been tainted

Too late. This study is now junk.
No amount of review of the data will ever prove it is accurate.
Can them! This type of falsification of data should not be tolerated by the scientific community.
May they never find a job in their selected field again.

7 posted on 12/31/2001 5:35:17 PM PST by sistergoldenhair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Queen Elizabeth of Iowa
Now there is a sensible question, why indeed not?

Let me get perhaps less sensible and suggest that these Canadian lynx be stopped at the US border, there's probably more snowshoe hares in Canada anyway, based on there certainly being more snowshoes in Canada.

8 posted on 12/31/2001 5:35:59 PM PST by citizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: expose
They said if it is found that the intent was to skew the study, the biologists should be fired.

"Fired"?
This country is so far down the toilet that I am convinced more than ever that it's hopeless.

9 posted on 12/31/2001 5:36:04 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DWSUWF
You can rule out "accidental truth".
This is, afterall, merely another heroic defense of mother nature...
at least one of the eco-cult's truisms is that ends justify means.
These yo-yo's are BOTH Eco-fascists and Government employees; what kind of proof do you need?
10 posted on 12/31/2001 5:38:07 PM PST by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: expose, Carry_Okie, GrandmaC, AuntB, blackie, Texican, kitchen, GeorgeFrmBr00klynPark, marsh2, fo
Well, well, well. About time the AP picked up on this. The Washington Times (only newspaper i read regularly) had a breaking story about this Dec 4th. There have been several followup letters to the editor about all this, and some follow up news stories as well.

Look for Audrey Hudson on the byline.

Deus Vult! 'Pod

11 posted on 12/31/2001 5:39:40 PM PST by sauropod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard, OWK, hosepipe
Correct Analysis. While the country fiddles chasing the bearded one, the totalitarians continue to grasp at our freedoms.
12 posted on 12/31/2001 5:41:41 PM PST by sauropod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sistergoldenhair
They said if it is found that the intent was to skew the study the agency is confident the lynx count has not been tainted

And when Winona Ryder was caught shoplifting, she was only doing research for a future role.

13 posted on 12/31/2001 5:44:18 PM PST by L.N. Smithee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: expose
WA F&G biologist confesses
14 posted on 12/31/2001 5:46:51 PM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin
thanks for the link
15 posted on 12/31/2001 5:50:26 PM PST by expose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: norton
"...what kind of proof do you need?..."

This far exceeds the amount of proof required...

We're at war with this bastards, whether we care to openly acknowledge it or not.

16 posted on 12/31/2001 5:57:29 PM PST by DWSUWF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Queen Elizabeth of Iowa
Why was it done then, praytell?

The seven biologists -- three from the Forest Service, two from the Fish and Wildlife Service and two from the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife -- admitted they planted the samples and said they wanted to test whether the lab could identify lynx fur.

Yeah right! And Bill Clinton didn't have sex with Monica Lewinski.

17 posted on 12/31/2001 6:02:13 PM PST by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Queen Elizabeth of Iowa
BTW, I've got a bridge for sale if Chris Tollefson is interested.
18 posted on 12/31/2001 6:03:37 PM PST by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: expose; OLDWORD
Phil,

This is an important story. These "scientists" should be fired, not reassigned. Pass this along to RTSH?

Congressman Billybob

Click and bookmark for fun in the morning. FReepers especially invited to call in.

19 posted on 12/31/2001 6:04:55 PM PST by Congressman Billybob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin;expose
"I didn't trust the results of the lab, so I wasn't going to tell them I was sending in a blind sample. A 1998 study came out with the results of lynx up and down the Cascades, and that didn't seem logical. Most of us doubted it. How could there be so many lynx?"

I got this off of the linked article. Does anyone else have a problem with this statement? The earlier study was wrong because it came back with too many lynx? Wasn't the study supposed to determin how many there were? The lab came back with results we didn't like so we sent in false samples to test the lab????

20 posted on 12/31/2001 6:17:39 PM PST by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson