Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Bill Clinton Sent Manufacturing Jobs to China (Walk memory lane)
AmericanThinker ^ | September 19, 2016 | Michael Bargo, Jr.

Posted on 08/23/2019 9:18:17 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: Chgogal

Heart breaking to observe huge factories shuttered up in Chicago. There was a saying in those days, “if you can’t find a good job in Chicago, you are in trouble”.


21 posted on 08/23/2019 10:12:11 AM PDT by entropy12 (Learn all you can from the mistakes of others. You won't have time to make them all yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
Blue collar workers must love this guy as he is saving their livelihoods in the manufacturing sector.

The liberal media and the democratic party are making sure that blue-collar workers don't notice what Trump has done for them. What liberals and their liberal media want those workers and the whole of America to hear, is "Trump the racist, Trump the homophone, Trump uncaring about the little people, etc". Nothing about the real issues, because, the democrats lose on the real issues every time.
22 posted on 08/23/2019 10:12:44 AM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: indthkr

Correctomundo...China joined WTO in 2001.


23 posted on 08/23/2019 10:17:19 AM PDT by entropy12 (Learn all you can from the mistakes of others. You won't have time to make them all yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: granada

It’s also a reminder that there are several public hangings that are seriously past due.


24 posted on 08/23/2019 10:24:05 AM PDT by oldtech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

It was payback for campaign financing funneled through President Hussain’s second homeland.


25 posted on 08/23/2019 10:29:50 AM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

I am old enough to remember that saying.


26 posted on 08/23/2019 10:42:17 AM PDT by Chgogal (Trump: Make America Great Again. Democrat: Make America Mexico Again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

I began working for a utility in the early 1980’s when we had those Ice Age winters. The manufacturing base was huge. It is nothing now.


27 posted on 08/23/2019 10:44:52 AM PDT by Chgogal (Trump: Make America Great Again. Democrat: Make America Mexico Again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Sam Gamgee

Read this, the comments, and the original article; this should help you with your history lesson re China and what Trump is now trying to fix.


28 posted on 08/23/2019 11:34:37 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

I remember in the bad old days of the Clinton presidency, following a lot of this stuff. Missile targeting technology, crypto technology, that was another big one, passed under Clinton’s authority. You remember the episode with Los Alamos when they evacuated it and then our nuclear targeting information was burgled... that was weird. Chinese were buying into military tech companies to get access to technology they couldn’t otherwise get. I think that happened again recently with Biden’s investment fund...


29 posted on 08/23/2019 12:57:10 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marron

I know that the Chinese were given a tour of the R&D department of Picatinny Arsenal. I know someone that was there.


30 posted on 08/23/2019 1:37:32 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

But didn’t it fall in 1980 from 40% to 6%, so what difference did Clinton make? No one saw fit in 1980, 1981, ect, to move the tariffs back up to 40%, correct?


31 posted on 08/23/2019 1:55:34 PM PDT by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Gamgee

Did you read the article?


32 posted on 08/23/2019 2:55:42 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

Yes I did and it said it conditionally gave preferred trade status back to China in 1980.


33 posted on 08/23/2019 3:42:07 PM PDT by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Sam Gamgee
And that's all you got from the article? Seriously?

You missed At the time, U.S.-China trade relations were conditioned upon China’s humanitarian treatment of its own citizens. Americans had seen protesters in Tiananmen Square crushed by Chinese tanks. The brutality of the Chinese toward unarmed protesters had shocked Americans so much that China was required to treat its citizens in a humanitarian way in order to maintain its MFN (Most Favored Nation) status.

And China’s MFN status was suspended during the Korean War, but conditionally reinstated in 1980 under the Jackson-Vanir freedom of emigration amendment to the Trade Act of 1974.

And This is where Bill Clinton stepped in. With his 1993 Executive Order, he unconstitutionally seized control of the MFN conditions, removing it from the involvement of Congress,

34 posted on 08/23/2019 6:25:27 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
Bill Clinton illegally shifted the decision-making role to the Secretary of State. This eliminated the power of Congress to approve the annual MFN status.

I followed the MFN debates fairly closely, and I've never heard it explained like that before. Both Congress and the MSM had to have intentionally sealed their lips because that should have been a major political upheaval and controversy. But little or nothing was said about it.

35 posted on 08/23/2019 7:18:29 PM PDT by Will88 (The only people opposing voter ID are those benefiting from voter fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

I guess I was a wee bit confused by the article. If the atrocities of Tiananmen Square occurred in 1989 why didn’t Congress revoke the MFN status at that time? Wouldn’t the blame go to the Congress and Bush senior at that time?

To be honest I couldn’t make sense of the last part with Bill Clinton’s EO in 1993. It sounds like Congress would no longer have the ability to remove MFN from China, and only the POTUS could do so, and he had no intention of doing so, in effect making MFN status permanent for China.


36 posted on 09/03/2019 11:37:39 AM PDT by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson