Astronomy Picture of the Day - Black Hole Accreting with Jet (illustration)

There are relatively few absolutes. Almost anything and everything is relative.

Exactly, and the less absolute we know, the less certain we can be of our conclusions. Black Holes are a good example of that.

Using “Black Hole” in the given context, what is being described is an enormous amount of matter existing in an exceptionally minuscule volume of spacetime (I disagree with the singularity concept attributable to incomplete/imperfect mathematical models)

But you treat the first part of your statement as if it is true. The reality is that you are uttering the theory, which remains unproved. That's my point.

We can't fully understand Black Holes without understanding the singularities. That remains part of the lesser known or understood characteristic. For, the evolution of Black Holes is apparently in conflict with standard quantum evolution model, as it seems to rule out the sort of increase in disorder that seems to be required when Black Holes are present. But this really isn't my field.

I 'm really just talking about the truth. Black Holes are still in the working theory stage. Too many unknowns still exist.

The theory has been proven to a reasonable level of detail with no viable alternative offered to explain observations.

Well, that is exactly how wrong conclusions have been created & persisted over the lifespan of mankind.

You want what isn’t reasonable or necessary considering what has been reasoned to date.

Well, that is your opinion, and I respect your opinion, while simultaneously not fully accepting your opinion.

Semantics.

Again, your opinion. 3 for 3 your opinions that you try to push as fact. However, Black Holes are still, in reality, working theories that remain unproven.

Where did I try to push anything as “fact”?

You first posted that no black hole had ever been seen, and my response was that your statement was technically incorrect and I provided two pictures of Black Holes.

Then you declared that no confirmation can be provided to prove they are actually Black Holes.

As I stated previously, you can believe what you desire.

I would suggest not building a rocket to see if you can prove it one way or another, like the Flat Earther guy who did so and prematurely ended his existence!

Technology has rendered pictures irrelevant. Heck now even videos are irrelevant with deep fake technology. Here is a song that one would assume is really the artist singing it:

Randy Travis - Where That Came From

Here is the story about the song:

Randy Travis, a country music legend, has released a new song called “Where That Came From” after a decade-long hiatus. The song marks a significant milestone in Travis’s career, as he has been unable to sing or speak since suffering a near-fatal stroke in 2013. The song was recorded using artificial intelligence technology, which recreated Travis’s voice based on past audio tracks.

The song is a beautiful love ballad, penned by Scotty Emerick and John Scott Sherrill, and features Travis singing about a one-of-a-kind woman who captured his heart. The song’s release has sparked excitement among country music fans and marks one of the most impossible comebacks in music history.

Travis’s team worked with AI technology to create the song, using an AI voice clone to recreate his voice. The process involved training the AI on past audio tracks of Travis’s singing, allowing it to mimic his tone and style. The result is a hauntingly beautiful song that showcases Travis’s signature country twang and emotional delivery.

The song’s release has been met with widespread acclaim, with fans and critics alike praising the song’s emotional depth and Travis’s ability to convey his signature country charm despite the challenges he has faced. “Where That Came From” is a testament to the power of technology and the human spirit, and serves as a reminder that even in the face of adversity, creativity and artistry can still thrive.

It is a very beautiful song, and AI has it's amazing qualities that can be appreciated. When used for good, great, but like everything else people with dark sides will use it for corrupt purposes.

You are taking this way too personal.

All I asked for you to do is provide proof of its authenticity. Perhaps now you understand better what I was really doing. Congratulations with continuing to seek the truth. That's all I am asking that be done for the Black Hole Theory. For that is exactly what it is, a working theory that is unproven. There is compelling evidence claimed, but are the claims the truth?

It's not about you at all, It has everything to do with technology & lies with regards to science. Both present BS as truth, believing we are all dumb enough to buy their blatant lies like their supporters do without questioning them at all.

That is why they hate us. We do not buy anything they present. Fool me once, shame on you. Continue to fool me, shame on me.

I mean for goodness sake, they can't even define what a woman is. But they can sure spot a straight white male with no problems can't they.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.