Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Killing germs, reducing waste, making oil: TDP might be the next big thing
USA Today ^ | 1/22/2004 | Andrew Kantor

Posted on 02/28/2004 9:46:17 PM PST by grundle

Edited on 04/13/2004 1:42:01 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: Waco
If it really could produce as much oil as it says, then it should become self sufficiant after a short while.
21 posted on 02/29/2004 12:23:25 AM PST by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TheLion
Yeah, I understand, I also understand industrial chemical processing is futurizing by leaps & bounds beyond what the old fogies thought was possible.

It's very exciting & I wish them good luck.

22 posted on 02/29/2004 12:23:47 AM PST by norraad ("What light!">Blues Brothers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: grundle
Hmmmmm....Gonna run this by the local Chemistry brain, see what he thinks.
23 posted on 02/29/2004 12:25:31 AM PST by Zeroisanumber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Waco
There was an article on this about a year ago posted here on FR. The system is only about 50-70% efficient. However we're talking trash here. If 30-50% is used to generate the power and 50-70% become oil (and other materials), do we really care about the lost 30-50%?

It's not a free lunch, but the cost is something we want to get rid of anyway. It would be a good deal if it was on 20% efficient.
24 posted on 02/29/2004 12:50:00 AM PST by JosephW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: grundle
Kantor of USA today on TDP(link to Discover article in PDF)
25 posted on 02/29/2004 1:58:02 AM PST by Bobber58 (whatever it takes, for as long as it takes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Our man in washington
I wish that person had decided to not have children also.
26 posted on 02/29/2004 2:11:52 AM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TheLion
I saved the one you remember reading, remarking that time would tell if this was an inefficient source or, if it was a technology before it's time. Hype does not overcome reality. This is the first article on the subject that I've seen since the first one, and it remains to be seen what sort of technology this is. The first article even went so far as to say the facility itself was not very expensive to build, or would be recouped easily by profit of production.
So, one article every six or eight months to describe a miracle. I'm waiting.
27 posted on 02/29/2004 2:32:29 AM PST by wita (truthspeaks@freerepublic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
BTTT!!!!!
28 posted on 02/29/2004 3:04:40 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: grundle
"Dioxins and PCBs are two particularly nasty kinds of chemical. Right now, we don't really dispose of what we make; we burn or bury it, which means it ends up forgotten but not gone."

This article has more inaccuracies per square inch than any "science" article I have seen in quite a while. The sentence above is just one example. Sorry, Mr. Kantor, but properly burning dioxins and PCB's DOES destroy them, and they are indeed GONE.

This isn't to say the TDP is not a good idea, but, please, folks, lets not let the hyperbole get out of hand.

29 posted on 02/29/2004 3:46:03 AM PST by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
I wish that person had decided to not have children also.

The real shame is his/her parents didn't make the decision not to have children. Then this poor soul wouldn't be spending his/her adulthood regretting his/her children. Can anything be worse?

30 posted on 02/29/2004 4:06:20 AM PST by laredo44 (liberty is not the problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: grundle
Good Sunday morning laugh.

I did the same thing with coal, a few years back. Now I have all the diamonds I will ever need.




And no, you can't have any

31 posted on 02/29/2004 4:12:31 AM PST by G.Mason (The trouble with practical jokes is that very often they get elected -- Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Waco
The original article from last year should be able to answer your questions:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/897232/posts




32 posted on 02/29/2004 9:17:04 AM PST by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TheLion
The article "Anything into oil" is over at Discover.com but you need to be a subscriber or pay for the article.

Here's another article that looks very much like the original "Discover" article".

Here's an old FR thread discussing it at the time the article originally came out.

For more, search on titles containg both the words "turkey" and "oil".

33 posted on 02/29/2004 9:22:14 AM PST by DuncanWaring (...and Freedom tastes of Reality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: grundle
WOW !
34 posted on 02/29/2004 9:39:51 AM PST by Jimbaugh (They will not get away with this. Developing . . . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheLion
The article "Anything into oil" is over at Discover.com but you need to be a subscriber or pay for the article.

Here's an old link to the same article posted on FR... Anything Into Oil

35 posted on 02/29/2004 10:20:51 AM PST by Gritty ("Iraq's like the Wild West, but nobody's the sheriff"-Kelly McCann)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: grundle
Apparently the Conagra Turkey processing plant was to be on line about the end of July, last year. And there is no word anywhere I can seem to find out about it since then, except some management changes at its process developer's company in February.

Strange - perhaps it is going the way of the Fish carbuerator.

From all kinds of anticipation, to not even a mention or link between Conagra and Carthage on the web.
36 posted on 02/29/2004 5:13:56 PM PST by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
"The only thing this process can't handle is nuclear waste," says Appel. "If it contains carbon we can do it."

http://www.sovereignty.org.uk/features/footnmouth/zwaste2.html
37 posted on 02/29/2004 10:26:33 PM PST by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TheLion
Oh, that pesky periodic table. Oil is carbon and hydrogen. Lotsa other elements to deal with, and for that matter a dearth of hydrogen to go with all the carbon.
38 posted on 02/29/2004 10:31:28 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Gritty
Thanks for the link. The posts were interesting to read!
39 posted on 02/29/2004 10:41:55 PM PST by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring
Thanks for the links. Lots of interesting reading! Looks like they kept this private to prevent take-overs. Too bad we can't invest in it.

I have yet to find any downside outside of man-made regulations and wacko groups who may not approve of it.

Oil companies don't need to fear it because they can buy the oil cheap.

Waste disposal companies can sell them waste to go though the process. Companies that have waste will gladly give it to these guys rather than paying a fortune to dispose of it.
40 posted on 02/29/2004 10:59:05 PM PST by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson