Bush-bashing: international sport?

Christian Science Monitor ^ | March 2, 2004 | Brendan O'Neill

[stands2reason]

Bump

[Texasforever]

Personally the more the "world" hates Bush the more I support him.

[Fenris6]

The author fails to note that this bush-bashing is a double-edged weapon. I now hate Europe as much as they hate Bush. I hope you guys choke on it. And don't bother asking us to rescue you again when you supplicate yourselves to yet another set of socialist tyrants.

[Texasforever]

Buh-Bye

[Cincinatus' Wife]

The Left hated Reagan with a passion too. He zeroed in on communism. Now comes Bush zeroed in on terrorists. The Left is beside themselves with fear and loathing.

[demlosers]

The U.S WW2 Lend Lease program was not totally paid for by our allies troll. See you later loser.

[Cincinatus' Wife]

That's a fine attitude. Didn't we "pay" enough with blood and treasure?

[demlosers]

Your intelligent kind belongs over here [DUh] where your talents can be fawned over. What did say your IQ was .98 among orangutans?

[Fledermaus]

Boo hoo, boo hoo, boo hoo...so you whiney Eurotrash couldn't pay for the weapons you needed to defeat the socialist, fascist monster you allowed to run free because your failed social systems couldn't create an economy viable enough to build them yourselves or raise the cash needed to purchase them.

Boo hoo, boo hoo, boo hoo hoo!

[Don W]

Here, kittie kittie kittie.

[Cincinatus' Wife]

WORLD WAR II CASUALTIES

Of the 405,399 Americans that lost their lives during World War II, there were 78,976 Missing in Action. Of the remainder the next of kin of 93,242 elected to have their loved ones buried at our cemeteries. Below is a listing by cemetery showing the number buried and the number that were declared Missing in Action in the vicinity of the cemetery. The listing of the World War II database, now on the web contains the 172,218 names of those buried at our cemeteries, those Missing in Action and those buried or lost at sea. It does not contain the names of the 233,181 Americans returned to the United States for burial. You may contact us by e-mail at operations@abmc.gov

Conflict Cost in $ Billions Current

World War I --- 1,911.47
World War II --- 15,655.17
Source

[Qwinn]

Uh huh, that claim of an IQ of 98 is quite typical for people who get 1200 on their SAT's, in the age when they were considerably more difficult, BEFORE leftists decided to dumb them down tremendously so no one's "self-esteem" would suffer.

But yes, Bush got 1200 on his SAT's. It's not genius level but no one of just average intelligence was going to get that in the years he took it either. You probably never took SAT's, being from Europe - too bad, I'd love to know what you would've gotten on them.

I don't think it would've been too high, considering that the words you seem to find so chilling - "You're either with us or against us" - were first spoken by Hillary Clinton on September 13, 2001. No one complained when she said it, of course. We know how that works.

Qwinn

[backhoe]

youre always "yanking" on your dicks.such hipocrites,sell weapons to everyone and wonder why they hate you.how very stupid.

So, you have an illiteracy problem?

[Cincinatus' Wife]

[you should be grateful,if it wasnt for you americans making money of the war the great depression will still be going.but me personally,i think it still is.cant even build nuclear weapons yourself you had to get the englands "intelligence" ha ha ha there is a reason youre called yanks,because youre always "yanking" on your dicks.such hipocrites,sell weapons to everyone and wonder why they hate you.how very stupid.]

***Indeed, if they aren't careful, such critics could prove to be Bush's secret weapon:***

Nothing like a poster to prove the author's premise.

I bet the IQ is lower than the waist measurement.

[driftless]

Those who say the hate-Bush invective is the worse they've ever seen probably weren't around when Reagan was prez. I seem to recall just about the same level of invective. And if I were a far left-wing nut like Ivins and Moore, I'd be a drooling incoherent fool too considering how Bush is failing to facilitate the further follies of malfunctioning far-leftism.