I have beat this drum into the ground. BO and his henchmen have access to every national security secret. Which of these anti-americans revealed this key information and how many more secrets have been sold/revealed to enemies. If these tyrants are ever removed from office, the numbers will stagger the public. Make no mistake on this one, this is just the tip of the mountaintop.
Yep, Bush’s Fault! WTH. Might as well....... If he tripped and fell over a carpet in the WH, it would be Bush’s Fault.
ROTFLMAO! I can see it now: year 2066, dateline MSNBC
"A spokesman for former President Barack Obama (who crapped his Depends this morning at the old folks home) blamed former President George W. Bush for the mishap. Bush, who passed away 20 years ago in 2046, had no comment."
Set up to push for Bush/Cheney prosecution for war crimes again.
Now here’s a conspiracy: Wikileaks obtains military documents and instead of sharing them with all news organizations, shares them only with one German, one British, and one American paper. All left-leaning. Then they cherry pick the info and release it all on the same day.
When I met you guys on 9/12 in D.C., I voiced my belief that 0b0z0 will create a crisis as an excuse to throttle or shutdown the communication between Americans to achieve total control towards a dictatorship.
Communists can’t take over an armed population without first controlling the communication between the people.
I believe that 0bagger gave the go ahead to his communists to “leak” the documents and to threaten more documents to be published.
0b0z0 can’t face the November election losses and has to do something about it.
The communists have huge problems with the Internet, talk radio and FNC. The drumbeat about closing FOX is getting louder with the Sherrod debacle, even she is piling on the only media outlet that defended her.
The Internet could be throttled under the guise of protecting national security. 0b0z0’s regime could declare a moratorium for six months or a year on “chosen dangerous sites.”
Talk radio is threatened by the “Fairness Doctrine” already.
The Republic is facing a mostly contrived perfect storm that threatens its very existence.
Bush’s fault. /s
PING!
The SAME Wikileaks that tried to frame our troops by carefully editing flight footage and implying we were out to kill reporters and children for sport?!?
Remember this? http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2489925/posts
They have ZERO Credibility.
.....45 Heroes successfully fought off an organized attack by hundreds of heavily-armed Taliban and al Queda..
Matthew Phillips is but one of many men & women who gave their lives for their country. I honor everyone of them. [I do not think Ms. Phillips is related to SPC Matthew Phillips mentioned below.]
SPC Phillips' wife was one of my son's teacher the previous school year. The following year she was a graduation advisor for my son's graduating class.
Julian Assange's head would would explode if he saw the ovation Mrs. Phillips got at the graduation. Not a dry eye in the house. We honored her husband and wanted her to know we would never, ever take that sacrifice for granted..
How dare he try to dredge up allegations of war crimes. He should be named as a terrorist and should be drawn & quartered when he comes out of his hole. He can't even man up to face those he seeks to disparage.
=================
Soldiers recount firefight that left nine dead in Afghanistan
(excerpt & bold mine)
.....When the attack began, Stafford grabbed his M-240 machine gun off a north-facing sandbag wall and moved it to an east-facing sandbag wall. Moments later, RPGs struck the north-facing wall, knocking Stafford out of the fighting position and wounding another soldier.
Stafford thought he was on fire, so he rolled around, regaining his senses. Nearby, Cpl. Gunnar Zwilling, who later died in the fight, had a stunned look on his face.
Immediately, a grenade exploded beside Stafford, blowing him down to a lower terrace at the observation post and knocking his helmet off. Stafford put his helmet back on and noticed how badly he was bleeding.
Cpl. Matthew Phillips was close by, so Stafford called to him for help. Phillips was preparing to throw a grenade and shot a look at Stafford that said: "Give me a second. I gotta go kill these guys first."
This was only about 30 to 60 seconds into the attack.
Kneeling behind a sandbag wall, Phillips pulled the grenade pin, but just after he threw it, an RPG exploded at his position. The tail of the RPG smacked Stafford's helmet. The dust cleared. Phillips was slumped over, his chest on his knees and his hands by his side. Stafford called out to his buddy three or four times, but Phillips never answered or moved.
"When I saw Phillips die, I looked down and was bleeding pretty good, that's probably the most scared I was at any point," Stafford said. "Then I kinda had to calm myself down and be like, 'All right, I gotta go try to do my job.'"
The soldier from Parker, Colo., loaded his 9 mm handgun, crawled up to their fighting position, stuck the pistol over the sandbags and fired.
You know, treason used to be a crime. Now it’s a photo op.
If the perp is white Holder will prosecute. Not very effectively, I’m sure, but still....
The Pentagon has suspect in the leaks:
This is what Obama meant by transparency. As long as it doesn’t cost him and his cronies anything he does not care about our troops.
Still curious about anyone who’s read the documents and can illustrate which ones in particular will put a “grave threat to our troops”...
Or, do people want to keep making blanketed statements without providing examples, just like their fellow Obummer supporters who cry racism anytime someone doesn’t tow the line?
Incase anyone’s interested in knowing, I fully support prosecution and even hanging/gasing/firing squad/etc for spreading secrets that show troop movements, plans for attack, etc etc. I just don’t see any in these in what I’ve read.
So far, however, I’ve only seen “hang ‘em high” comments and Troofer-esque conspiracy theories of the Pentagon/WH/Congress being directly responsible for the leaks.
NOTE The following text is a quote:
http://www.defense.gov//News/NewsArticle.aspx?ID=60189
Obama: Issues in Leaked Documents Led to Review
By Lisa Daniel
American Forces Press Service
WASHINGTON, July 27, 2010 – President Barack Obama today issued his first comments on WikiLeaks’ release of Afghanistan war documents, saying he is concerned about the leaks, but that they don’t reveal any new issues.
“While I’m concerned about the disclosure of sensitive information from the battlefield that could potentially jeopardize individuals or operations,” Obama said, “the fact is that these documents don’t reveal any issues that haven’t already informed our public debate on Afghanistan. Indeed, they point to the same challenges that led me to conduct an extensive review last fall.”
The president made the comments from the White House Rose Garden after meeting with members of the House and Senate on a variety of issues, including Afghanistan war funding, job creation, and energy policy.
WikiLeaks, a whistleblower Web site, created controversy July 25 by posting more than 90,000 secret military reports from Afghanistan.
Obama said the period covered in the reports – from January 2004 to December 2009 – show shortcomings in U.S. policy in Afghanistan that led to his review last fall and his decision to increase U.S. troop strength there by 30,000.
“For seven years we failed to implement a strategy adequate to the challenge in this region,” Obama said today. “That’s why we substantially increased our commitment there, and insisted on” the cooperation of Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Obama said he hoped the House would vote today to support funding for the war in Afghanistan, which the Senate approved unanimously last week.
Biographies:
President Barack Obama
Related Articles:
Chairman Appalled by WikiLeaks Release
Department Assesses Leaked Documents
QUOTE:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2560042/posts
EDITORIAL: Leaking death - Wikileaks is putting American troops in danger
THE WASHINGTON TIMES ^ | July 26, 2010 | WASHINGTON TIMES
Posted on July 27, 2010 4:24:40 PM PDT by Iam1ru1-2
MugshotWikileaks founder Julian Assange speaks during a press conference in London on Monday, July 26, 2010, during which he said he believes there is evidence of war crimes in the thousands of pages of leaked U.S. military documents relating to the war in Afghanistan.
The Wikileaks release of 92,000 mostly secret documents on the Afghanistan War has produced no bombshell revelations, but it has revealed the dangers of the “open government” movement. The main impact of the document dump may be to teach the enemy how better to kill our fighting forces.
Reporters are naturally trying to find scandal in the massive document trove, but these are not the Pentagon Papers. Not all secret documents have news value or historical importance. Most of the 92,000 records - in fact, almost all of them - have no news value. Several thousand are unclassified or the classification is not noted, and the highest classification appears to be “secret,” which is about at the level of detail and significance of most news reports.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
Hat Tip:
http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/203380.php
###
###
ON THE INTERNET:
www.revolutionmuslim.com/2010/07/emergency-demonstration.html
#
www.youtube.com/user/muslimsagnstcrusades
www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJdC4Bs7Z_k