Posted on 01/22/2022 7:06:18 PM PST by where's_the_Outrage?
Texas has NO STANDING.
Sounds like Activism to me.
Murder is unconstitutional...
Yeah... SCOTUS doesn't get to "provide a constitutional right".
Put some solarcaine on that burn, MSNBC. We've complained about that for DECADES, and you had no time for us. Now, we're stopping baby murders, and you NPCs are screaming. TOO BAD.
Do you think the plant ever gets tired of staring at itself in the mirror?
Suppose Roe v Wade is overturned.
Doesn’t that mean that the law covering such things reverts to the states, each state individually ?
I’m going to read later anyway.
We would take The Wide Latina Clown more seriously if she hadn't just got done ruling that women in Texas who work for health care and for large businesses have no right to control their own bodies.
Clown.
MSDNC
That’s where most should stop reading. After spotting that, the rest is predictable progressive spin.
Yes.
“IMHO case law is the worst of the law.”
I agree. The Constitution says laws are made by the Legislative branch, not the Executive or Judicial.
That's where she looks familiar. She reminds me of a Hampshire we raised.
The author writes for MSNBC, a Leftist fake-news outlet that runs propaganda for the Democrat Party. The Marxist cabal doesn’t want a Supreme Court that is guided strictly by Constitutional Law. They rely on activist judges who are ideologues to subvert the Constitution. This is clearly a case of the pot calling the kettle black.
“a case that provides a constitutional right”
Yeah, the Constitution waxes eloquent about abortion ‘rights’.
Jessica Levinson is just another run-of-the-mill Goebbels acolyte...
This absurd propaganda screed is typical of what the sheeple get from msm and other communist sources...
I believe in this case, the writer is not ignorant, rather that the writer is very stupid.
They would be acting like a political body rather than a court?
Oh like the original Roe v. Wade which legislated right to abortion.
I think the most blatant judicial legislating was gay marriage.
overturn a case that provides a constitutional right,
***I would like to see where in the constitution there is such a right. There is that pesky phrase in the declaration of independence: RIGHT TO LIFE, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
“A case that provides a constitutional right…”
WHAT
Cases don’t provide these. The constitution enumerates them. If a case provides one THAT is law making
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.