President Trump: “We Have To Defeat The Climate Hoaxsters!”

WeLoveTrump.com ^ | 11/23/2022

[MAGAthon]

this is why Trump is the ONLY choice for 2024.

this is his biggest threat to the global elite.

[gibsonguy]

Trump is damn near the only one with the courage to say this and he is far from the only one who knows it. Every so called Conservative should be saying this on a near daily basis to push back on these a-holes pushing us back into the Middle Ages.

[palmer]

The rise from 0.018% to 0.042% is almost entirely manmade. If we just had a natural rise from post-Little Ice Age warming, there would have been a rise from 0.018% to 0.019% at most. That's based on the long term record showing about 100 ppm rise for 10C of warming or 100 ppm fall for 10C of cooling

See the charts here: https://joannenova.com.au/global-warming-2/ice-core-graph/. She shows that CO2 lags temperature. That means the main driver of CO2 is from rising or falling temperatures. The CO2 to temperature link is very weak and if it were not weak we would have had runaway greenhouse a billion years ago.

The point is that warming following the Little Ice Age was about 1C. That would cause about 10 ppm rise in CO2. Instead we had 140 ppm rise in CO2. More importantly there's 2.5 ppm rise in CO2 every year, year over year (above the annual cycle). That amount cannot be caused by warming oceans in the past century or centuries. The only logical explanation is manmade CO2.

Man is responsible for 3.4% of that 0.04%

Manmade CO2 is about 3% of naturally created CO2. Man's uptake of CO2 is essentially zero. Nature's uptake is roughly equal to naturally created CO2. When you use the 3.4% figure you are not including natural uptake. IOW you are comparing the year over year rise in your chart to the entire annual rise and ignoring the annual drop.

[palmer]

Global warming or cooling is caused by volcanic activity…there are undersea volcanoes that change the temperature of the ocean

Geothermal flux including all volcanoes is about 44TW. Average sunlight (day/night planet-wide) is 80,000 TW. Essentially the geothermal flux is trivial.

A better explanation is that global warming is caused by variations in the 40,000 TW latent heat transfer (evaporation, convection, and condensation at high altitude). Short term temperatures are controlled by the ocean temperature whixh is controlled by ocean cycles like El Nino and La Nina. Those don't cause long term "global warming" but they certainly have a huge short term effect (e.g we've been cooling since 2016)

[E. Pluribus Unum]

It’s been much, much higher in the geological past and the Earth was not incinerated, crisis-troll.

[Eccl 10:2]

Don’t forget variability of the sun’s energy output.

Climate alarmists think the sun is some kind of constant, like the thermostat in their mom’s basement.

[Hojczyk]

Probably a lot of things…
.
You can add the sun …the earths orbit around the sun

[rlmorel]

This is one very specific reason I appreciate Donald Trump, and wish fervently for him to be President again in 2024.

---

These excerpts below are from the Rose Garden statement by President Trump on his decision to withdraw from the Paris Climate Accord-June 1, 2017

---

"...For example, under the agreement, China will be able to increase these emissions by a staggering number of years — 13. They can do whatever they want for 13 years. Not us. India makes its participation contingent on receiving billions and billions and billions of dollars in foreign aid from developed countries. There are many other examples. But the bottom line is that the Paris Accord is very unfair, at the highest level, to the United States..."

Further, while the current agreement effectively blocks the development of clean coal in America — which it does, and the mines are starting to open up. We’re having a big opening in two weeks. Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia, so many places. A big opening of a brand-new mine. It’s unheard of. For many, many years, that hasn’t happened. They asked me if I’d go. I’m going to try.

"...China will be allowed to build hundreds of additional coal plants. So we can’t build the plants, but they can, according to this agreement. India will be allowed to double its coal production by 2020. Think of it: India can double their coal production. We’re supposed to get rid of ours. Even Europe is allowed to continue construction of coal plants..."

"...In short, the agreement doesn’t eliminate coal jobs, it just transfers those jobs out of America and the United States, and ships them to foreign countries. This agreement is less about the climate and more about other countries gaining a financial advantage over the United States. The rest of the world applauded when we signed the Paris Agreement — they went wild; they were so happy — for the simple reason that it put our country, the United States of America, which we all love, at a very, very big economic disadvantage. A cynic would say the obvious reason for economic competitors and their wish to see us remain in the agreement is so that we continue to suffer this self-inflicted major economic wound. We would find it very hard to compete with other countries from other parts of the world..."

The agreement is a massive redistribution of United States wealth to other countries...

I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris. As President, I have one obligation, and that obligation is to the American people. The Paris Accord would undermine our economy, hamstring our workers, weaken our sovereignty, impose unacceptable legal risks, and put us at a permanent disadvantage to the other countries of the world. It is time to exit the Paris Accord — (applause) — and time to pursue a new deal that protects the environment, our companies, our citizens, and our country.

It is time to put Youngstown, Ohio, Detroit, Michigan, and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania — along with many, many other locations within our great country — before Paris, France. It is time to make America great again. (Applause.) Thank you. Thank you. Thank you very much..."

---

Those areas in bold red are why. But the large, bolded, red, and underlined passage is PRECISELY why I want Trump back in office.

Read those last three statements in bold red. When have we heard, from other than Donald Trump, those types of unequivocal statements on reality from ANY public figure? And there are people on our side who don't want him back? How is that possible?

I almost fell out of my chair when I heard him publicly, in front of the world, declare "Climate Change" a wealth redistribution scheme from the Oval Office! THAT is why we need him in the Oval Office.

[Persevero]

Yea. Call them the climate commies. They are just seizing the means of production.

[palmer]

It’s been much, much higher in the geological past and the Earth was not incinerated, crisis-troll.

As I stated above: The CO2 to temperature link is very weak and if it were not weak we would have had runaway greenhouse a billion years ago.

So we agree: extra manmade CO2 is not a problem in any way. We know that it has several benefits and it would be foolish to try to reverse that rise.

[yldstrk]

What is the name of Corsi’s new book?

[yldstrk]

Exactly.

[tomkat]

Climate Hoaxsters

When one understand that's merely a euphemism for communists, things become much clearer.

[higgmeister]

Hockey sticks are always manmade.

[higgmeister]

Hockey sticks are always manmade.

Wait no, I meant hockey sticks are always manufactured.

[Thapsus_epiphany]

Charles Darwin’s theories of evolution led directly to the Nazi ideology of the ‘MASTER RACE’. Darwin had unwittingly created a monster, and his ardent disciples of ‘the survival of the fittest’ took it to it’s natural conclusion; to wit, mass murder.
The same thing will happen with these brainwashed idiots and climate change. At some point in the not-so-distant future, one of these climate cultists will ascend to power with a make believe mandate to fix climate change, and the result will be, you guessed it, mass murder.
Trump is absolutely correct, the need to expose and discredit the climate hoax cult is as urgent as any other issue we face.

[central_va]

A small gradual increase in CO2 levels over time is a good thing. The opposite woud be cause for global alarm and panic. CO2 below 160PPM would be catastrohic.

[aquila48]

Bookmark

[FroggyTheGremlim]

Well, what causes the OCEAN temperature to rise and fall?

As an astronomer, I nominate THE SUN.

[Vaduz]

This is one very specific reason I appreciate Donald Trump