[Eleutheria5]

No, hell no, and GFYS.

[aquila48]

We”ll surrender if you let us win

[faucetman]

When we are all dead? Okay.

[Clutch Martin]

Liars... but it’s okay because their book (unabridged edition) tells them so.

[hinckley buzzard]

Nobody but the AP would even notice this drivel.

[fuzzylogic]

lol...”we’re sorry we started wars in the past and lost, along with territory. We’d like to forget about that, can we have our land back?”

No.

And if that is your only ceasefire terms, you shall now die.

[Rummyfan]

Khalil al-Hayya, a top Hamas official, on Wednesday told the Associated Press (AP) in Istanbul that the terror group would agree to a ceasefire of five years or more, and agree to lay down its weapons...

Better yet, a de facto cease fire will occur when Khalil al-Hayya and the rest of Hamas are dead.

[Nervous Tick]

There’s a much simpler condition under which Hamass will disarm — and it’s absolutely assured of success, with no possibility of relaps:

THEY’RE ALL 100% KILLED TO DEATH! Along with all their supporters.

[Wuli]

“an independent Palestinian state were created along the pre-1967 borders”

Not going to happen. Why? Such borders have proven time and time again that they offer no security to Israel, and in particular no security to the Jews of Israel.

The “pre-1967 borders” are a recipe for the destruction of Israel and Hamas and everone else knows it.

[ViLaLuz]

Ariel Sharon 2.0?

[daniel1212]

The map below shows how Israeli population centers were literally under the gun — within easy rocket and even artillery range — from enemy borders before 1967. And would be again if captured territories were returned to the Arabs, as happened in Gaza in 2005.

- https://iris.org.il/israel-before-1967/

And the rejected proposed 1947 UN Partition Plan for Palestine borders

Again, note that the size of the proposed Arab state are considerably larger than the ‘1967 Borders’.
The Arabs said NO! And to affirm their negative, five Arab armies invaded with the expressed intention to annihilate the Jews.

• A few weeks after the 1967 Six Day War, Israel proposed to withdraw to the Pre War lines, in return for peace. The Arab league answer? The three NOs of Khartoum.

So, from the above you can answer your own question.

The reason the Arabs had said no to any compromise suggestion, is that any such compromise would leave uppity Jews as sovereign, non dhimmis, on Islamic land (never mind that Jews had Kingdoms on that same land when the prophet Muhammed (PBuH) wasn’t even a gleam in his father’s eyes), which is unacceptable to any Arab or Muslim. Land, once conquered by Muslim, should stay Muslim until the end of time (you hear that, Spaniards, Greeks, and Bulgarians?) - Again, note that the size of the proposed Arab state are considerably larger than the ‘1967 Borders’.
The Arabs said NO! And to affirm their negative, five Arab armies invaded with the expressed intention to annihilate the Jews.

• A few weeks after the 1967 Six Day War, Israel proposed to withdraw to the Pre War lines, in return for peace. The Arab league answer? The three NOs of Khartoum.

So, from the above you can answer your own question.

The reason the Arabs had said no to any compromise suggestion, is that any such compromise would leave uppity Jews as sovereign, non dhimmis, on Islamic land (never mind that Jews had Kingdoms on that same land when the prophet Muhammed (PBuH) wasn’t even a gleam in his father’s eyes), which is unacceptable to any Arab or Muslim. Land, once conquered by Muslim, should stay Muslim until the end of time (you hear that, Spaniards, Greeks, and Bulgarians?)

[444Flyer]

“For ADONAI has chosen Tziyon, he has wanted it as his home.” ~ Psalm 132:13

[dfwgator]

There is already a Palestinian state, it’s called “Jordan”.

[M Kehoe]

+1

5.56mm

[1Old Pro]

Until they release the hostages in a healthy state, no sense even talking to them.