Skip to comments.
One in five US adolescents has sex before turning 15
Taipei Times ^
| 5.21.03
Posted on 05/21/2003 9:03:52 AM PDT by Enemy Of The State
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
To: Enemy Of The State
Experts say that the report should be a wake-up call to parents and teachers that education needs to start earlier because kids are way ahead of themInteresting conclusion.
To: Enemy Of The State
Re one in five:
Yeah, but how many of them were alone?
3
posted on
05/21/2003 9:06:09 AM PDT
by
Pearls Before Swine
(South-south-west, south, south-east, east....)
To: Enemy Of The State
not surprising, since it was this generation that was raised by free-love boomer idiots, who walk around naked in their own homes and smoke bowls with their kids!
To: johniegrad
No, they need to be left in the dark or scared crapless by my mom like I was.
Sex ed needs to be taught to scare kids.
Such as: "The male penis is poisonous during heightened puberty, it will infect you and cause a growth inside you like that of the movie Alien. Do you want that instead of having fun with your friends??? Huh, Huh?!?!"
5
posted on
05/21/2003 9:08:14 AM PDT
by
smith288
(Why do liberals believe every ammendment is personal but the 2nd?)
To: Enemy Of The State
1/5 of kids have sex before age 15, and 1/3 of their parents know it? That means 1 out of 15 parents know their young'uns are doing it? And they're allowing it? Who ARE these people?
6
posted on
05/21/2003 9:08:35 AM PDT
by
gitmo
(THEN: Give me Liberty or give me Death. NOW: Take my Liberty so I can't hurt Myself.)
To: Enemy Of The State
Sad findings indeed. How many of these sexual active teenagers come from broken homes?
Why would a parent let their children begin dating at the age of 13 or 14? My God, I certainly had no interest in dating at that age!
7
posted on
05/21/2003 9:11:58 AM PDT
by
Gerish
To: smith288
Pretty good analogy, LOL. But seriously, kids are bombarded with sex 24/7, commercials, television, even news programs, Hollyweird will not rest until everyone is having orgies with men, women, boys, girls and animals. I honestly believe that is their agenda.
8
posted on
05/21/2003 9:13:34 AM PDT
by
mel
To: Enemy Of The State
Well, at least they seem to be using contraception, since the teen pregnancy rate is down. Interestingly, we don't have any statistics on how many kids under 15 had sex back in the early 60's, when I was that age. It wasn't at all uncommon back then, either. It just wasn't studied.
I'd guess that the rate hasn't changed all that much, to tell you the truth, but I didn't do a survey of my peers back then, either.
Further, among the boys, asking whether they have had sex is likely to produce some invalid answers, I'd bet. Girls are more likely to tell the truth about such things, anonymously than boys are.
To: gitmo
1)Welfare trash
2)Idiots/Liberals
3) Irresponsible people who should not have reproduced anyway (non voting)
4)Babies who had babies and don't see anything wrong with it.
I knew a woman once who said "I will teach my kids to do drugs the right way". The person she had this discussion with while they were getting high said "Are you stoopid, there is no right way to do drugs." They were both category 3 people.
10
posted on
05/21/2003 9:13:55 AM PDT
by
Jaded
(Close the BORDERS and the CHECKBOOK!! (schpelin iz opshenul))
To: Gerish
I was busy playing army in my dug out fox hole in my back yard with my brother shooting imaginary Vietnamese (we watched the evil and corrupting "Full Metal Jacket" alot).
Of course it could have been my total disinterest in fashion and "coolness" when I was 14 that helped me repel chicks.
11
posted on
05/21/2003 9:14:42 AM PDT
by
smith288
(Why do liberals believe every ammendment is personal but the 2nd?)
To: Enemy Of The State
"Brown and others said there was reason to believe that in the years since the data was collected, fewer young teenagers had been having sex. For those 14 and younger, according to federal data, the birthrate declined 43 percent from 1991 to 2001, while the decline for older teenagers was 27 percent." Fallacious conclusion. They use a declining birth rate to conclude that fewer of these Young Americans are having sex. I would suggest that a much more likely factor in the declining birth rate amongst this group would be the use of various means of birth control. They're still having sex, they're simply not getting pregnant as often.
Michael
To: Gerish
"Why would a parent let their children begin dating at the age of 13 or 14? My God, I certainly had no interest in dating at that age!"
How long ago was that? For me, I was 14 in 1959, and was plenty interested in dating. We went to movies, mostly, since we couldn't drive, but there was a heckuva lot of pairing off in my high school.
Not everyone dated at 14, but most of the kids I knew did. That's in 1959, mind you.
To: Pearls Before Swine
1 in 5
Shouldn't that read 2 in 10?
To: Enemy Of The State
Experts say that the report should be a wake-up call to parents and teachers that education needs to start earlier because kids are way ahead of them Start earlier ??? The kids have been getting sex instruction, cleverly disguised as "sex education," since the second grade. Sexual Instruction without a firm set of morals already in place has been a disaster. I'm waiting to watch all the finger pointing that happens with this.
15
posted on
05/21/2003 9:19:10 AM PDT
by
bimbo
To: Enemy Of The State
Does this count "monicas?" The true number is probably higher since kids don't view it any differently than X42.
16
posted on
05/21/2003 9:21:53 AM PDT
by
GraniteStateConservative
(Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
To: Enemy Of The State
"First, discourage early one-on-one dating, and second,
be very, very leery of significant age differences," Brwon said.
Now why didn't the reporter follow up on this little hint? The dirtly little secret is that the younger the teen mother, the older the father is likely to be, often by 5 years or more.
17
posted on
05/21/2003 9:22:43 AM PDT
by
Valpal1
(Impeach the 9th! Please!!)
To: GraniteStateConservative
"Does this count "monicas?" The true number is probably higher since kids don't view it any differently than X42."
As it said in the very first sentence of the article, they were talking about _sexual intercourse_. Oral sex is no doubt far more prevalent than the 20% rate given for intercourse. It was when I was a kid, too, way back in the early 60's. How about when you were a kid?
To: Enemy Of The State
And just think, Mary Kay LeTourneau is in jail too... IF she were out of prison, what would these numbers be?
19
posted on
05/21/2003 9:25:47 AM PDT
by
Koblenz
(There's usually a free market solution)
To: MineralMan
I really don't think this is new news.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson