Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Survey: Teen drug use, smoking up slightly
CNN ^ | Thursday, September 4, 2003 | AP

Posted on 09/04/2003 11:25:57 AM PDT by the_devils_advocate_666

Edited on 04/29/2004 2:03:04 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: vin-one
Great, they have a lower murder rate too. Better ban guns like there too eh?

I don't care what the dutch do.. I don't want to live in that liberal hellhole.
41 posted on 09/04/2003 1:40:03 PM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
your side would never play with numbers for your agenda.

The Institute of Medicine is not "my side."

42 posted on 09/04/2003 1:40:33 PM PDT by MrLeRoy (The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
Stop confusing them with facts.
43 posted on 09/04/2003 1:41:26 PM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
Well the demand for harder drugs is usually higher once exposed to it, that's just nature. The more pleasure the more demand.

I think this is true for a relative few idiots, but for most people I think there's a cost-benefit calculation that keeps them from doing hard drugs. The facts back this up -- there are millions more people who smoke pot than who do heroin.

44 posted on 09/04/2003 1:43:09 PM PDT by ellery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ellery
Stop confusing them with facts.
45 posted on 09/04/2003 1:46:10 PM PDT by MrLeRoy (The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: ellery
Explain the explosive growth of X and crack in the 80's then. Drug users usually don't care to die, but they sure don't care about their own health much.
46 posted on 09/04/2003 1:50:19 PM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
"You know for a fact that youth use of alcohol and cigarettes wouldn't be even higher if they were criminalized for adults?"

Who know? Who cares? Who's calling for that? Don't change the subject.

"If so, that in no way changes the fact that sellers' total incentives would have changed in the direction of discouraging sales to kids."

What are you talking about? If marijuana were legal and sold like booze, the seller has as much reluctance selling marijuana to kids as selling alcohol to kids. And 50% of the kids are drinking.

But I'm talking about the drug dealer who, in addition to selling every illegal drug, will continue to sell marijuana to kids at the same price he did before legalization. And why not?

Actually, you've made his job easier since you can't bust him for possession with intent to sell. Gotta catch him in the act now.

47 posted on 09/04/2003 1:54:27 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ellery
but but but people who do coke are 85x more likely to have smoked grass then not!!!

48 posted on 09/04/2003 1:54:43 PM PDT by toothless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
"You know for a fact that youth use of alcohol and cigarettes wouldn't be even higher if they were criminalized for adults?"

Who know? Who cares?

It's central to your claim that youth use alcohol and cigarettes weighs against my argument that relegalization for adults disincentivizes sales to kids.

If marijuana were legal and sold like booze, the seller has as much reluctance selling marijuana to kids as selling alcohol to kids. And 50% of the kids are drinking.

Alcohol is used not quite twice as often as pot among 6th-to-12th graders; among adults the ratio is about 10 to 1. The legal drug is proportionately less used by kids than the illegal drug.

But I'm talking about the drug dealer who, in addition to selling every illegal drug, will continue to sell marijuana to kids at the same price he did before legalization.

Just like he now sells them liquor?

49 posted on 09/04/2003 1:59:37 PM PDT by MrLeRoy (The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
Why are tobacco and alcohol #1 in use, even though they are less addictive and have less effects than these other drugs?

Despite your "personal experiences", they are NOT less addictive.

50 posted on 09/04/2003 2:08:56 PM PDT by jmc813 (Check out the FR Big Brother 4 thread! http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/943368/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
Explain the explosive growth of X and crack in the 80's then. Drug users usually don't care to die, but they sure don't care about their own health much.

My inderstanding is that crack exploded among people already doing/prone to doing hard drugs because it's cheap and potent. My guess about X is that people have no idea how dangerous it is. My proposed solution: shift the federal government's anti-drug effort away from an incarceration-based apporach to an education and treatment-based one (but treatment with 12-step programs, not methadone). And per the 10th amendment, let states decide whether drugs should be legal, illegal, or non-criminal offenses (and let the feds enforce only interstate drug issues).

If you disagree with my proposed solution, please explain to me why drug use went up in almost all age groups in the past decade, when we've jailed a record number of people for drug offenses? And also explain why we should pour more time and money into a government program that has produced results opposite of what they intended?

51 posted on 09/04/2003 2:16:30 PM PDT by ellery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: toothless
Hee.
52 posted on 09/04/2003 2:17:27 PM PDT by ellery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
"among adults the ratio is about 10 to 1"

Irrelevant.

Also not true, especially with marijuana use which drops off after age 30-35.

53 posted on 09/04/2003 2:21:03 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: StatesEnemy
I'm just tired of my dealer telling me the local high school kids have already bought him out of the good stuff.
54 posted on 09/04/2003 2:51:37 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
"drops off after age 30-35."

Throws a wrench into the whole 'addicted fiends who can't quit' angle doesn't it?
55 posted on 09/05/2003 6:44:56 AM PDT by toothless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: the_devils_advocate_666
"A companion survey on marijuana use found that students who smoke the drug at least once a month are more likely to think about suicide, carry guns to class and get into trouble at school or with police. They also are less likely to earn good grades and participate in school activities such as sports and clubs. "

I would love to see yet another companion survey regarding the home/parent situations of this kids who are thinking about suicide, carrying guns etc.

I still believe the root of the problem is the home, not so much the supply.

56 posted on 09/05/2003 7:04:58 AM PDT by sweet_diane (Philippians 4:12-13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
"among adults the ratio is about 10 to 1"

Irrelevant.

Wrong. The complete argument, which you butchered: "Alcohol is used not quite twice as often as pot among 6th-to-12th graders; among adults the ratio is about 10 to 1. The legal drug is proportionately less used by kids than the illegal drug."

Also not true, especially with marijuana use which drops off after age 30-35.

If so, the ratio climbs even higher for 35+, lending that much more support to my point that the legal drug is proportionately less used by kids than the illegal drug.

57 posted on 09/05/2003 7:05:02 AM PDT by MrLeRoy (The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: toothless
"Throws a wrench into the whole 'addicted fiends who can't quit' angle doesn't it?"

Who said quit? I just said they stopped doing marijuana.

As far as we know, the could have gateway'd to cocaine or heroin.

58 posted on 09/05/2003 7:10:59 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
"Why are tobacco and alcohol #1 in use, even though they are less addictive and have less effects than these other drugs?"

Having spoken with addicts & alcoholics in recovery, they claim tobacco is the most difficult addiction to shake, which is why most don't quit. (step outside any AA/NA/CA meeting and you'll see mounds cig butts and coffee cups) One who really stands out in my memory was a clean and sober former heroin addict who'd also kicked smoking.. he said that without a doubt, even with the horrible detox from herion, cigs were the toughest to overcome.

Just my experience, I have no data to back this up.

And please, never be fooled that alcoholism is ANY less a destructor of life and family then drug addiction, be the drug of choice legal or illegal.

59 posted on 09/05/2003 7:13:23 AM PDT by sweet_diane (Philippians 4:12-13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson