Skip to comments.
Putin: Clinton Wasn't Interested in Fighting Terrorism
NewsMax.com ^
| 11/08/01
| Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff
Posted on 11/08/2001 12:29:42 AM PST by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 last
To: Libertarian_4_eva
Anyone who can't see through Hitlery is, in my opinion, not quite up to the level of Homo sapiens. Thus, yes, it is the voters' fault. You get who you vote for. The eight years of The Toon's administration (particularly the last four years) are, sadly, an indictment of this nation.
To: kattracks
bttt
42
posted on
07/31/2002 8:08:00 PM PDT
by
piasa
To: piasa
Now this is more like it........LOL.
43
posted on
07/31/2002 8:08:46 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Hugh Akston
What's Putin's angle?Maybe the realization that the United States and Russia face a common enemy - emerging Islamic fundamentalism - and that Russia faces this enemy directly on its borders? And that Clinton is doing his typical best to undermine America as it tries to confront this enemy?
44
posted on
07/31/2002 8:11:29 PM PDT
by
dirtboy
To: PeoplesRepublicOfWashington
Anyone who can't see through Hitlery is, in my opinion, not quite up to the level of Homo sapiens. Maybe we need a new hominid species - Homo democratus. Would have invented fire, but did not want to contribute to global warming. Would have learned to hunt, but thought animals had a right to exist also. Would have fought off predators, but believed they had legitimate concerns as well. Would have made tools, but that was actual work.
45
posted on
07/31/2002 8:15:06 PM PDT
by
dirtboy
To: Rubber Duckie
Too the hell bad that the thought of resigning never occured to him for the sake and safety of the country. And shame on the democrats for putting on the knee pads with pride and allowed him to be "preoccupied"
To: Imperial Warrior
babes, blowjobs, burgers, bullshit... All these are true, but you left out the most important ones: The demise of Honesty, Integrity, Concept of Right, and Wrong, What IS is, American Justice, And perhaps the death of the worlds great experiment of Free Enterprise. Clinton certainly led the Nation by Example in all the above. Quite a legacy indeed!
To: dirtboy; RJayneJ
Nomination for Quote of the Day! LOL!! (See #45.)
To: kattracks
Putin: Clinton Wasn't Interested in Fighting TerrorismDear Vlad,
Sorry to disagree but Bubba had an interest in terrorism His interest was in pardoning terrorists for votes.
Regards,
John
49
posted on
07/31/2002 8:36:53 PM PDT
by
jwalsh07
To: Rubber Duckie
Therefore, it is all the fault of Republicans and the VRWC. I was just about to say the very same thing, then I saw your post, and now I don't have to! That is what I got from that statement too.
To: Rubber Duckie
That sex scandal wasn't going on during 1995 when he could have gotten bin Laden turned over as a prisoner. It's no excuse regardless.
To: Libertarian_4_eva
Rick hid from the press? I certainly saw him a lot on TV. Hillary didn't hide from the press, but she certainly didn't answer any hardball questions either, not that she was asked!
There is also the question of a little thing like voter fraud that is hidden on the back pages of little know papers.
To: kattracks
all the damage.... What we know already is more than enough: 09.11.01, the dying economy, the corruption of the American Society, and the American Business, which led to the Stock Market Bubble, and Collapse.
To: Miss Marple
Thanks for the nomination! };^D)
54
posted on
07/31/2002 9:32:46 PM PDT
by
RJayneJ
To: NittanyLion
Putin opposed Clinton's SUPPORT of Islamic terrorism during the NATO bombing campaign against Serbia. Putin was telling the turth to the world about the situation while Clinton LIED.
To: Hugh Akston
What are Putin's motives here? I don't know .. but any way you look at it .. Putin slammed Clinton BIG TIME
56
posted on
07/31/2002 9:56:59 PM PDT
by
Mo1
To: dirtboy
Homo democratus. Would have invented fire, but did not want to contribute to global warming. Would have learned to hunt, but thought animals had a right to exist also. Would have fought off predators, but believed they had legitimate concerns as well. Would have made tools, but that was actual work. Excellent! Viewing them as an entirely separate species makes a lot of sense.
To: Miss Marple
MM,
I agree that Putin has many reasons to be angry with both Clintons. Since he came to power, they have openly disrespected both his country and his policies. With Russia in decline, I would think that even the most green diplomat at the State Department wouldn't be insulting a nation with nuclear weapons.
In addition to all the points you have made, I would have to wonder if the Clintons co-presidency were supposed to steer the US into a more Soviet-friendly orbit instead of a blatantly pro-Chinese adminstration. The Russians and the Chinese have been waging a larger "Communist Cold War" over their shared border for decades. Hundreds of troops have been killed on each side in border clashes over the years.
The up side of Putin's conversations with the Western press is that he's not being subtle on purpose. He's sending a message - you figure out to whom. Revenge, like chess, has nearly been perfected by the Russians.
jriemer
58
posted on
08/01/2002 10:47:27 AM PDT
by
jriemer
To: dirtboy
Hey! You got "Quote of the Day!" Congratulations!
To: Miss Marple
Yeah! Thanks for the nomination!
60
posted on
08/01/2002 10:53:33 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson