Posted on 12/11/2001 6:50:52 AM PST by dead
...or a RINO....
What does this mean?
Bold mine, so as to emphasize the area of question whilst including the sentence en toto...
This definition is exactly half true. The here-unspoken half is that gender-feminists are perfectly willing to claim biologically-based female superiority, AND THEY DO, where it advantages them. That half is not referred to here, and it is the key half. Miss this half, lose to them, much as society has for 30+ years.
Here we agree. Bold mine.
Would that this were only half the missing thesis of gender feminism. People chuckle at the term "feminazi," but it's perfectly apropos if one thinks about it. The parallel only begins with your observation that gender feminists claim superiority over men. Via feminist doctrine, men - as a group - have been singled out as a "them" and assigned a vast array of evil and dangerous characteristics. By the liberal's own definition, isolating a group of people, then assigning specific evil characteristics to that entire group, is called hatred. Gender feminism is a hate based philosophy every bit as much as Naziism.
The slogan tricks women and OUR society into thinking womb life support is somehow a negotiable right between women and men. Once conception has occurred, there is a third life involved in the male-female interchange; the issues are no longer reproductive rights of the man or woman, but life support for a new, unique, individual lifetime alrady running and sequestered in the womb. To negotiate away the individuality of that third person is the flaw in tolerance of serial killing for social policy. The right to life is an endowment by our CREATOR, not an endowment by the negotiating parties (where there is negotiation, and usually there is zero negotiation before a woman hires a serial killer to kill the unborn, living child within her body).
The slogan tricks women and OUR society into thinking womb life support is somehow a negotiable right between women and men. Once conception has occurred, there is a third life involved in the male-female interchange; the issues are no longer reproductive rights of the man or woman, but life support for a new, unique, individual lifetime alrady running and sequestered in the womb. To negotiate away the individuality of that third person is the flaw in tolerance of serial killing for social policy. The right to life is an endowment by our CREATOR, not an endowment by the negotiating parties (where there is negotiation, and usually there is zero negotiation before a woman hires a serial killer to kill the unborn, living child within her body).
The slogan tricks women and OUR society into thinking womb life support is somehow a negotiable right between women and men. Once conception has occurred, there is a third life involved in the male-female interchange; the issues are no longer reproductive rights of the man or woman, but life support for a new, unique, individual lifetime already running and sequestered in the womb. To negotiate away the individuality of that third person is the flaw in tolerance of serial killing for social policy. The right to life is an endowment by our CREATOR, not an endowment by the negotiating parties (where there is negotiation, and usually there is zero negotiation before a woman hires a serial killer to kill the unborn, living child within her body).
Hope you're having a great first week of 2002.
One of the tamer examples is:
"I feel that 'man-hating' is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them."
-- Robin Morgan (current editor of MS magazine)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.