Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stop the universe, it's leaving us behind (faster-than-light expansion)
Sydney Morning Herald ^ | 3/21/02 | Richard Macey

Posted on 03/20/2002 6:47:11 AM PST by dead

Wave goodbye to the universe. The expansion of the universe, which began about 15 billon years ago with the Big Bang, is mysteriously getting faster, Australian and British astronomers say.

However, they admitted yesterday they did not have a clue what "dark energy" was driving the galaxies to defy gravity and fly apart with ever increasing speed.

"We don't understand the physical process," said Matthew Colless, of the Australian National University.

But, "eventually the universe will accelerate so rapidly the more distant galaxies we can see today will move away faster than the speed of light and will disappear over the horizon."

Expansion faster than light is possible because, not only are galaxies flying apart at extraordinary speeds, but space itself is expanding, carrying the galaxies away with it.

Until 1998 astrophysicists were debating whether gravity was slowing the expansion enough to eventually cause the universe to collapse in a Big Crunch.

That year other astronomers, including Brian Schmidt, of the ANU's Mount Stromlo Observatory, near Canberra, produced the first solid evidence that the expansion was accelerating.

Studying exploding stars, they found that the more distant ones were fainter - and thus further - than seemed possible. They concluded an accelerating universe was to blame.

"It was a huge surprise," Dr Schmidt recalled yesterday. "I was rather scared to go out and tell people. I thought they'd laugh me off the planet."

Dr Colless, one of the first he told, was "shaking his head".

The new project, involving the ANU, the University of NSW, the Anglo-Australian Observatory near Coonabarabran, and British scientists, led by Cambridge Professor George Efstathiou, used a different method to reach the same finding.

They spent five years mapping the position and speed of 220,000 galaxies. They then compared the data with microwave radio charts of other scientists to "map" the universe as it was 150,000 years after the Big Bang - before the first galaxies even lit up. They found that only an accelerating universe would have allowed it to grow to today's size.

"Now we have two independent pieces of evidence that both give exactly the same answer," Dr Colless said. "I didn't believe Brian at first ... you have to rearrange the mental furniture."

While most galaxies would vanish from view, the Milky Way, and its nearest neighbours, glued together by gravity, would travel on alone. Dr Schmidt said the confirmation was "great news for me. I can sleep a little better. It's evidence we didn't screw up four years ago."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-147 next last

1 posted on 03/20/2002 6:47:11 AM PST by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dead
"Expansion of the Universe."

Now, only an over-funded scientist could come up with a silly statement like that, if it's infinite, it can't "expand," and if it's expanding, what is it expanding into?

2 posted on 03/20/2002 6:51:51 AM PST by Henchster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
Cool.

There are so many questions about this, if you think about it in terms of Relativity.

3 posted on 03/20/2002 6:54:21 AM PST by linear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer; Physicist; ThinkPlease; PatrickHenry; VadeRetro
accelerating Cosmological expansion bttt
4 posted on 03/20/2002 6:54:22 AM PST by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
If you are in a space ship traveling at the speed of light and you turn on the headlights, what happens?

5 posted on 03/20/2002 6:54:41 AM PST by Lokibob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
"Damn it Scottie, I said expound on the universe, not expand it."
6 posted on 03/20/2002 6:56:47 AM PST by skateman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
"There will be signs in the Sun, the moon, and the stars...."

BTW, scientists say the Sun is cooling, so how can the Globe be warming?

7 posted on 03/20/2002 6:56:53 AM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Henchster
maybe our universe will run into another another universe? Anyway, we have billions of years to worry about this problem.
8 posted on 03/20/2002 6:57:27 AM PST by Eternal_Bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Henchster
The best model we have to date for the universe is that it started with the Big Bang and has been expanding ever since. Time itself also started with the Big Bang so there is no "before" the Big Bang.
9 posted on 03/20/2002 6:57:58 AM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lokibob
"If you are in a space ship traveling at the speed of light and you turn on the headlights, what happens?

Well, if you were at the speed of the Universe's expansion, they would become tail lights!

10 posted on 03/20/2002 6:59:17 AM PST by CT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dead
"eventually the universe will accelerate so rapidly the more distant galaxies we can see today will move away faster than the speed of light and will disappear over the horizon."

I know some of the physics euridites on FR might understand how this is possible, but I thought c was the upper limit in speed, save gravity, which is a force and quantum events.

11 posted on 03/20/2002 6:59:54 AM PST by week 71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
It might have something to do with that inverse square thing. It also sounds like a giant balloon that's getting ready to burst -- that's it! -- the universe is going into burst mode. And, if it goes faster than light, wouldn't it be dark all the time? Or, is that the definition of Dark Matter.

Does anyone know where to buy faster-than-light bulbs?

12 posted on 03/20/2002 7:00:02 AM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longshadow; PatrickHenry; Physicist; ThinkPlease; blam; Sabertooth; boris; VadeRetro; Stultis...
Ping :)
13 posted on 03/20/2002 7:00:34 AM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
That was one of my questions. Assuming that acceleration beyond the speed of light causes you to travel back in time, won't the universe then be traveling back towards the big bang?
14 posted on 03/20/2002 7:02:17 AM PST by linear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
Shoot!

I almost missed this thread.



15 posted on 03/20/2002 7:02:51 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: week 71
I thought c was the upper limit in speed

RadioAstronomer will correct me if I'm wrong, but if you think of it like a balloon, it makes sense. C would be the max speed you could travel over the surface of the balloon, but it does not have anything to do with the rate of expansion of the balloon, which is what actually causes the galaxies on its surface to move apart.

16 posted on 03/20/2002 7:03:13 AM PST by RogueIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: week 71
"If at first the idea is not absurd, then there is no hope for it."

17 posted on 03/20/2002 7:06:55 AM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
Thanks for the ping, sounds strange, but makes some sort of sense to scientists I suppose.

Infinity is best thought about in a nice warm bed, with the blanket pulled over your head....
18 posted on 03/20/2002 7:07:45 AM PST by Aric2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dead
The expansion of the universe, which began about 15 billon years ago with the Big Bang,

Any clue yet as to what to do about the 20 Billion year old stars?

19 posted on 03/20/2002 7:09:46 AM PST by lepton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RogueIsland
Good illustration in post 16. However I still think Einstein must be turning over in his grave if these new revelations are true. cheers
20 posted on 03/20/2002 7:09:46 AM PST by week 71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson