Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FreeRepublic: A place for "grass-roots conservatism on the web" or not?
Me

Posted on 03/28/2002 8:04:49 AM PST by sheltonmac

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 741-753 next last
To: sheltonmac
Ummmmm... Another poor analysis. Roe was an attempt by the Liberal Court (markedly different than the one that sits today also) to expand rights not in the Constitution.

This bill restricts rights in the Constitution, and dems or Not, at least either Stevens or Breyer, will join the Right side, and O'Connor, in areas excepting abortion is reliable in this area as well.

The court generally takes a much dimmer view of restricting rights, (out side of Law and Order issues), than expanding ones that don't exist.

61 posted on 03/28/2002 8:32:58 AM PST by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: sheltonmac
Are we really supposed to "support" the president when he signs a bill that cracks down on free speech

Hey, second time in six months...

The boy is on a roll.

62 posted on 03/28/2002 8:32:59 AM PST by Beenliedto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
You're spot-on right. But it's not time to jump the boat yet.

Which amendment does he have to repeal in order to get you to jump the boat?

63 posted on 03/28/2002 8:33:07 AM PST by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sheltonmac
I can accept that GWB might and would break some campaign promises. That irritates me but it doesn't anger me. Politicians use weasel words just for that reason.

GWB took a solemn oath to protect the constitution and he knowingly, deliberatly and willinging violated that oath when he signed the CFR into law.

Please tell me how I can trust this man in the future, his oath means nothing, so how can I tell when he is lying or not.

64 posted on 03/28/2002 8:35:52 AM PST by gunshy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheltonmac
"Standing up for smaller government has nothing to do with party loyalty. "

Unless the Republicans (big "R") actually own this site - or the Rush Limbaugh show, for that matter - as they apparently think they do.

Free Republic is not a GOP plantation, as much as they would like it to be so.

65 posted on 03/28/2002 8:36:08 AM PST by Harrison Bergeron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sheltonmac
Oh yeah.. and P.S. What makes you think this will go down in flames? I think the president could have used his position to publicly educate the people

What do you expect him to do, commandeer all print and broadcast media, until they come around to his way of thinking. Like it or not, the Leftist media is responsible for the viablility of much of the expressed opinion in this country, you need look no further than the fact that nearly one third of ALL AMERICANS own guns, yet gun control is a viable political opinion in this country....The presidents "education' would last 30 seconds after he was finished delivering it, only to be discredited for the next 2 YEARS in the media.

66 posted on 03/28/2002 8:36:28 AM PST by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ItisaReligionofPeace
I actually said that I still respect him etc. but I was disappointed.

How disappointed? I'll bet not enough to withold your vote. And when do you stop respecting him? When he repeals another amendment?

When does "Enough is Enough" kick in?

67 posted on 03/28/2002 8:36:56 AM PST by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Harrison Bergeron
Not a GOP plantation, but couldn't we get a little actual THOUGHT, as opposed to knee jerk whining ????
68 posted on 03/28/2002 8:37:14 AM PST by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Gumlegs
However, I will not join the "It's the end of the world" crowd who threaten to defect to the Libertarians or the America First Party or the Know-Nothings when Bush fails whatever the ideological purity test is fashionable this week. He's an elected official. He will never be ideologically pure. Reagan wasn't.

But here's the problem: I don't think many of the people being critical here about Bush's actions in this case are the "end of the world" crowd you're talking about. I know I'm not.

The question is when is not appropriate to play politics with your ideology. Some things must be sacred. Tarrifs for steel would fall into the political playbook for me. Messing with the constitution is not in the political zone in my book.

So I think there is a MAJOR distinction that is being lost on many Freepers who want to paint with a broad brush all the critics of CFR.

69 posted on 03/28/2002 8:37:23 AM PST by BigTime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Bitwhacker
Sorry Bit......IMHO I think he did the right thing

Supreme Court will either kill it or this turkey will no longer be someone's signature issue!

This was pure politic's..

What will Johnny One Note have to run on now.....his support of the military????LOL!

70 posted on 03/28/2002 8:37:32 AM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: sheltonmac
Free Republic is a place for people to discuss our common goals regarding the restoration of our constitutionally limited republican form of government. If people have other agendas for FR, I really wish they would take them elsewhere.

Thanks, Jim
226 posted on 2/7/02 4:01 PM Pacific by Jim Robinson

71 posted on 03/28/2002 8:38:02 AM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheltonmac
"Perhaps the "one issue" that dismays so many people is the fact that the president we are expected to support has violated the very solemn oath he swore to keep, that being his promise to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. "

Perhaps its more than one issue too.

Remember when Bush gave the ultimatium, "You are either with us or with the terrorists?" Did he mean all terrorists except the Palistinian type? Are these good terrorists? because Bush cannot seem to make up his mind whos side he is on, alternately condemning first the Palistinians, then the Israelis?

Is protecting a few thousand steel jobs worth paying 30% more for steel in the US, and seeing manufacturing jobs which use steel move out of the US to places like Mexico? Does Bush believe in free trade or not? I thought he did when I voted for him?

How does giving the most corrupt sector of government, the Dept. of Education, the largest budget increase ever help it to become more efficient and honest?

Do we want Government regulators looking over the shoulder of religious charities even more than they already do? This would have been the effect of Bush's "Faith Based Initiative".

I had hopes that I was contributing and voting for a conservative who would limit the size and power of the Federal Government. With the size of the Federal Budget Increase it is clear that GW Bush is simply another tax and spend politician. Even the tax cut, while symbolic, is so small and so delayed as to be just that, symbolic.

72 posted on 03/28/2002 8:38:12 AM PST by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheltonmac
I busted my @ss getting W elected, I am a proud Conservative Republican and I was fortunate enough to attend the Economic Stimulas Bill signing in the Rose Garden a few weeks ago.

However, I find myself increasingly dissappointed in W's kowtowing to the democrats on EVERY Domestic issue. I was always leary of the "Compassionate" B.S. and now I am convinced that label stands for "Go along to get along."

Compassionate Conservative= I stand for NOTHING.

God Bless the Commonwealth, W, our country and most importantly- The Military!

73 posted on 03/28/2002 8:38:32 AM PST by fhillary2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol, BigTime
I am still glad that we don't have Algoreleoni, however, I am saddened to see that the Klinton Kool-Aid Brigade tm tries to say how this is a great political move.

If eroding our liberty is a great political move to so called conservatives, then we are in BIG TROUBLE! The fact that the NRA has to sue the Bush Administration over this is pretty pathetic.

The people who scolded me on that thread are the same type who thinks that their kids do no wrong no matter what the kids do. Sad.

74 posted on 03/28/2002 8:39:12 AM PST by ItisaReligionofPeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
IF that's the case, then obviously the best strategy was to sign it.

I think you are failing to distinguish between a strategy and a tactic. Consider the following thought experiment:

Should Bush sign a bill nationalizing all private property and wait two years for the SCOTUS to strike it down? Would the Constitution be any stronger for it?

If Bush cared at all about the Constitution, he should have vetoed the bill.

75 posted on 03/28/2002 8:40:03 AM PST by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
The bill gets packed away in Dassholes desk drawer until....A new president comes along and will sign it, and for his trouble, the biggest 2 proponents of the bill,McAnus, and the Mainstream media, Bash the living crap out of him, rekindle their love affair, give him an asspain primary in'03-'04, and use the issue to cost him ground in the middle against his Dem opponent in '04.

I see it now,,,, sign something unconstitutional in order to prevent someone else from theoretically siging it later. Sounds like a sound strategy to me.

Sounds like you care more about strategy than rights. That would put you in lockstep with him.

76 posted on 03/28/2002 8:40:45 AM PST by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Dog, you don't mind that he is playing politics with our Constitution? Are you sure you're a conservative? Maybe you'd be better off over there on one of the Bush Babe threads?
77 posted on 03/28/2002 8:41:28 AM PST by ItisaReligionofPeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: ThomasJefferson
How disappointed? I'll bet not enough to withold your vote. And when do you stop respecting him?

This is a perfect example of the Bush bashing -- you know, the bashing you all claim to hate so much. You complain about people disagreeing with you, yet you take any chance you see to let posters know that because THEY don't see things YOUR way -- the "correct" way, of course! -- they're dumb.

You just cannot have it both ways. Stop trying to make people who don't agree with you believe they are beneath you or are no "real conservatives," or "true patriots." If you all would stop acting so damn morally superior, perhaps the Bush Bots would lay off.

78 posted on 03/28/2002 8:43:42 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: sheltonmac
Free Republic is a place for people to discuss our common goals regarding the restoration of our constitutionally limited republican form of government. If people have other agendas for FR, I really wish they would take them elsewhere.

Thanks, Jim
226 posted on 2/7/02 4:01 PM Pacific by Jim Robinson

------------------------------------

[Whoops, I forgot the footnote]

Fresno, -- calling Fresno, -- We have a problem Fresno, -----

79 posted on 03/28/2002 8:43:53 AM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThomasJefferson
I see it now,,,, sign something unconstitutional in order to prevent someone else from theoretically siging it later. Sounds like a sound strategy to me.

Perhaps Bush should ask Congress to send him bills in opposition to each of the Bill of Rights. If we're strengthening the Constitution, let's not do it piecemeal. < /sarcasm >

80 posted on 03/28/2002 8:43:58 AM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 741-753 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson