Skip to comments.
WANTED MILITIA LEADER SURRENDERS
Lexington Herald-Leader ^
| Fri, Apr. 05, 2002
| Louise Taylor and Greg Kocher
Posted on 04/05/2002 2:39:01 AM PST by toddst
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 201-219 next last
To: infowars
I carry a Zippo lighter and break wind a lot. Guess I'm a human bomb, or more accurately a human flamethrower. I bet I can make it thru the best airport security with these bomb making materials. Quick, somebody call the ATF...I'm a menace to society.
Regards
J.R.
61
posted on
04/05/2002 5:01:24 AM PST
by
NMC EXP
To: infowars
So how did you like how your Feds just gave visas to the WTC mass murderers?Actually, I do like that, because it means that it's much more likely that the INS will get massively overhauled and the deadwood cut away.
After all, you seem to love it.
62
posted on
04/05/2002 5:02:44 AM PST
by
Poohbah
To: AppyPappy
Nothing scarier than a well-armed nut. I'll take well armed nuts over F Troop and the crap that we have called the federal government anyday.
To: infowars
I would get psychiatric help.
To: infowars
The people at Waco were not assassinated. They refused to surrender. They could have walked out at any time. Koresh could have sent the women and children out and they would be alive today. This guy here was under house arrest. If he thought the government was going to "assassinate" him, he could have invited people to his house as witnesses.
Face it, he's a paranoid nut.
To: Centurion2000
You are more likely to encounter a well-armed nut than a over-armed fed cowboy.
To: toddst
Asked why Puckett hadn't simply sought police help after the assassination note, Galbraith said the government had not shown itself to be a friend of his client. Obviously the best evidence here is the "assassination note". Where is it?
Said Galbraith: "Henry Kissinger used to say, 'It's OK to be paranoid because there is a they out there, and they are out to get you.'"
The "assassination note" must be analyzed to help determine who "they" are.
To: EricOKC
They are all the same type of person, fer sure.
FR has become infested with the socalled 'moderate' conservative Republican. -- RINO's.
They truly do not understand that constitutional conservatism, - fighting for a free republic, - cannot be accomplished by supporting the statist quo that exists today in ALL levels of government.
68
posted on
04/05/2002 5:18:56 AM PST
by
tpaine
To: AppyPappy
It's possible that Puckett was kidnapped.
To: Lucky
Our screwed up world today......they leave the illegal ME sleeper cells in the country and go after gun owning patriots! I hope someone in the area will keep us informed on this case. I will be happy to do so. Anyone with specific questions is welcome to FReepmail me. I live in Lexington, KY and have a strong interest in knowing what happens to (with) Charlie Puckett.
70
posted on
04/05/2002 5:23:46 AM PST
by
toddst
To: Poohbah
Why are you arguing in favor of unconstitutional ex post facto law?
71
posted on
04/05/2002 5:27:50 AM PST
by
tpaine
To: tpaine
The scariest thing I know is living in a country with so many Democrats in the government. And now we have a government that wants to disarm its
own people. Are we merely serfs living at the pleasure of tyrannts?
To: RGSpincich
Asked why Puckett hadn't simply sought police help after the assassination note, Galbraith said the government had not shown itself to be a friend of his client. Obviously the best evidence here is the "assassination note". Where is it? Said Galbraith: "Henry Kissinger used to say, 'It's OK to be paranoid because there is a they out there, and they are out to get you.'" The "assassination note" must be analyzed to help determine who "they" are. This situation is more complex that it appears on the surface. Some have said there is a Texas militia group involved here that may have applied pressure to Charlie Puckett and/or tried to take over the KY militia organization. Let's see what Charlie Pucketts' attorney does with this.
73
posted on
04/05/2002 5:30:22 AM PST
by
toddst
To: Fred Mertz
Who would want to kidnap him? He said he left to avoid a fed assassination.
Comment #75 Removed by Moderator
To: infowars
You need some background music: duelling banjos:~)
76
posted on
04/05/2002 5:30:51 AM PST
by
verity
Comment #77 Removed by Moderator
To: infowars
Why didn't they simply surrender? That's the question. No one supports the fed decision to burn them out. But why didn't they surrender? What were they hoping to gain by staying there and waiting for starvation to set in?
Comment #79 Removed by Moderator
To: tpaine
You consider any rational non-schizophrenic person to be a moderate. I'll never understand why people on FR become so enamored with wacked-out fruitcakes who dress up like GI Joe and play militia. Half of them are undercover feds anyway.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 201-219 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson