Posted on 04/07/2002 7:15:37 PM PDT by The Giant Apricots
I'd rephrase that to say that the baby-boomer right rather than the right in general.
This right does -- maybe more rights should.
I agree. In principle, and due to pragmatism: with all the RINO demands that Republicans should go hard-left on moral issues, appealing to average-joe worker interests would draw a lot more votes. The Republican Party lets it self be cast as the party of Ivy League elitists.
Is that the same as a "Bull dike commie whore traitor?"
Consider though that they are incubating a new phalanx of feminazi ideologues in the schools/colleges...
I'd suggest that the so-called "professor" take a "sabatical" at a neighborhood mental health facility, and learn to deal with whatever the hell it is that has her panties in a wad. Failing that, I'm more than willing to help her relocate to a place that would be more conforming to her outlook, such as Saudi Arabia.
(Reprinted with the permission of SheThinks.org, a publication of the Independent Women's Forum)
Shouldn't that read; a publication of the Ignorant COMMUNIST Women's Forum
Those evil business men that created jobs for people to earn money at the risk of their lives should have been shot!
Those Robber Barons giving people the ability to put food on their tables and a roof over their heads in exchange for
the possibility they could die on the job instead of death from Tuberculosis or Yellow Fever or Dysentery or even Starvation from lack of work. Who did they think they were!
</sarcasm>
Noble Builders of Human Civilization!
Now, now, that's not very Christian of you; Jesus wants you to hate your mother, too.
"If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple." (Luke 14:26)"I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. And a man's foes shall be they of his own household." (Matthew 10:35-36)
When I was a graduate student, I needed a great deal of repetitious glasswork done for my thesis research. We had one glassblower for the entire college and just enough work to keep him busy. My work would not justify hiring a second glassblower, but it would take much of his time. Furthermore, waiting for him to do my work delayed my experiments.
At one point, he offered to show me how to do the work myself. This arrangement was great for both of us. It kept him from having to do a boring repetitious job. It allowed him to keep his other customers happy because he wasn't delayed with my work. It allowed me to have my samples done more quickly. It also provided an opportunity for me to enhance my education with some hands-on work with the glass-blowing equipment. The situation was a win/win situation.
Unfortunately, someone in the union complained. The union idiot said that it violated some rule for me to be allowed to use the tools in the glass shop. While I could almost understand this concern if I were endangering a union job, I wasn't endangering anyone's job. I was simply getting things accomplished.
I've heard similar stories from others. There have been cases where a light bulb burnt out in someone's office and the union light bulb changer didn't change it for several days. When the person in the office bought a bulb and changed it himself, the union filed a grievance. Expecting someone to sit in the dark until some union idiot has time to change a light bulb is not reasonable.
Undoubtedly, the blue-collar men of the past faced tremendous challenges and bore heavy burdens to make this country strong and get things accomplished. Reforms to improve their situations were warranted. However, there are many people today hiding their own laziness and lack of initiative in union rules that don't allow their employers to fire them or even to reward other workers who are willing to work hard and accomplish things.
Maybe we can't protect ourselves against every lazy idiot who gets on the board of directors and receives huge compensation for doing nothing. However, adding the burden of thousands of lazy idiots who take the lowest union jobs and still receive compensation for doing nothing only increases the burden of the modern worker both union and non-union. The good blue-collar workers would find more friends on the right if they would help us to escape the burden of bad union workers. Likewise, if they know how to help us escape the burden of white-collar lazy idiots without instituting socialism, we are with them.
WFTR
Bill
I've thought the same thing. The thing is, they'd better watch it, as the stupid things they continue to do will affect their Social Security retirement. Either indirectly or as just desserts.
Congressman Billybob
Opps. I forget God is not allowed in the public schools. Never mind. Satan controls that area.
My point is that Republicans are perceived as upper-class white-collar workers, and often act as such. It's time to rework that image, but certainly not by coddling unions.
That's one heck of a way of saying lesbian! *L*
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.