Skip to comments.
German Socialists Urge Abolition of American Way of Life
NEWSMAX ^
| 4/9/02
| Cliff Kincaid
Posted on 04/08/2002 2:29:45 PM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
To: The Duke
We work. They don't.
= big envy.
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Other authors include Wolfgang Sachs, a fellow at German Wuppertal Institute who has achieved notoriety for arguing for a "virtue of enoughness rather than more economic growth...I'd like to see this guy explain that to some poor shmuck who's looking for a job.
Then again, he sounds a bit like a couple of Freepers, who love to carelessly throw around terms like "corporatism", and "Mammon".
To: Stefan Stackhouse
Good analogy. Although the Unibomber did kill directly. The anti-animal testers have killed at least one person, and will likely kill again.
To: The Duke
"There's no socialist like a German socialist."
Well, actually, the others(particularly the French), are distinguishable from NAZIs only by their aversion to sauerkraut and ersatz kaffee.
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
capitalism has gone "astray and "a new generation of instruments are needed such as user fees for the use of common goods to help restructure the international system. It urges global "user fees on the atmosphere, the oceans, and airspace to fund a World Environment Organization, an International Renewable Energy Agency and a World Commission on Mining, Gas and Oil Extraction.
Think Big!!
OWG ...Ouch !
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"Fairness in a Fragile World" I thought "Arbeit Macht Frei" was a lot catchier, myself.
To: UN_List
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
,,, it's important to not over react to this notion. Keep in mind that the distaste for Americans that sometimes surfaces in this sort of outburst is second only to the hatred that Euro states have for each other.
Comment #29 Removed by Moderator
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Just more proof that when communism was discredited with the fall of the Soviet Union, the commies migrated to the "green" movement.
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I'm hearing this "global tax" prattle with a little too much frequency to make me comfortable. Maybe we need a Constitutional amendment explicitly exempting Americans from any tax levied by any international body, so that if the Clinton/Gorons ever regain the presidency, they can't give in to this (already) unconstitutional globalist drivel, like you KNOW they'd love to do.
To: Alan Jackson
Hitler used the unions to make his moves. The leftist unions caught up big time in his move to make Germany the center of the world, purified in race and dedicated to the state. The state was not unlike Castro's cuba-the state was the father-the mentor-the ruler and the final arbiter of everything. Just like lefties like big nanny governments making all the decisions, so was the lefties hitlerian corp-the worker's party-claiming all for the state.
32
posted on
04/08/2002 3:42:37 PM PDT
by
Republic
To: Centurion2000
If Herr Fischer were a true socialist, his official government vehicle ought to be a "Trabbi", the pride of the former German socialist state that boasted a two-stroke engine out-horsepowered by the average American lawn mower. However, I suspect that Herr Fischer is instead chauffered in a rather more capitalist product, namely, a Mercedes-Benz.
33
posted on
04/08/2002 3:43:46 PM PDT
by
jpthomas
To: Alan Jackson
But isn't Nazism based on National Socialism, right-wing? It's totalitarian -- just like socialism.
The wing stuff is a red herring. You are just food to Nazis and Communists alike.
Socialists do not believe in nationalism, while for Nazis, Aryan nationalism was the main driving force.
*Imagery*. Those are just marketing spins to sell slavery. Idiots in one consumer group want a father-god-state to maintain tradition and idiots in another consumer group want a mommy-god-state to make things fair.
The only thing that matters about these ideas is that you are to be a slave.
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I've got something these neo Nazi's can tax.....hee, hee, hee........
To: Still Thinking
Maybe we need a Constitutional amendment explicitly exempting Americans from any tax levied by any international body, so that if the Clinton/Gorons ever regain the presidency, they can't give in to this (already) unconstitutional globalist drivel, like you KNOW they'd love to do. I'm not big on amending the Constitution, but generally I agree something should be put in place to protect us from this global (U.N.) tax mania.
36
posted on
04/08/2002 3:52:20 PM PDT
by
toddst
To: CaptRon
The unmitigated arrogance of this is astounding.These clowns are the "new aristocracy", and feel they are entitled to much more than what they will allow for everbody else. They feel they deserve their Mercedes limos, and villas in some depopulated paradise. After all, when you speak for the "little guy", it's only natural that you be rewarded richly. It's tough work ordering the lives of the other 99.9% of the population.
George Orwell hit the mark with "Animal Farm", which is even more descriptive of these elitist turds than was "1984".
To: Still Thinking
I'm hearing this "global tax" prattle with a little too much frequency to make me comfortable. Maybe we need a Constitutional amendment explicitly exempting Americans from any tax levied by any international body ... If a global tax were levied, it would not be assessed directly on citizens, but on governments. You would pay "your" global taxes in the form of increased income tax collected through the existing system. This is what the UN calls "global governance". Not a single world government governing everybody directly, but an addition layer on top.
38
posted on
04/08/2002 3:58:33 PM PDT
by
Salman
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Um, Global taxation would be taxation without representation, and our system is...
...never mind!
To: toddst
I'm not big on amending the Constitution, but generally I agree something should be put in place to protect us from this global (U.N.) tax mania.I agree in principle, but it is the most permanent and most difficult to reverse thing that I can think of, as opposed to an executive order or a new law. Not that the Dems (or the Pubbies, for that matter) are all that intent on obeying the Constitution anyway, but at least you'd have part of the solution in place.
I also feel that taxation by international bodies not elected by Americans is one of the few issues that are so fundamental or so important as to deserve Constitutional attention.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson