Posted on 04/08/2002 3:34:44 PM PDT by Austin Willard Wright
. . .But, that's just my opinion. . .
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 14:44:06 -0600
Sir, you criticized me, indeed insulted me, and all of my colleagues here, as I explained in my first e-mail to you. Perhaps you might want to re-read it.
You seem awfully touchy. You think the word "bigot" stills your speech, do you? You find "blasphemy" similarly upsetting. Well, what about "nigger"? "jewboy"? "bitch"? "the only good Indian is a dead Indian"? "faggot"? "tree-hugger"?
I would guess that you are a white male, who is not used to being treated as though he were "lower class," "lazy," "stupid," a nonentity, someone irrelevant to the discussion. White males are the first group to claim that there is no such thing as "hate speech," that all opinions are equal neutral and only words, that free speech protects the right of the powerful verbally to abuse the disempowered.
But when "diversity training" appears, directed at bigots, why, white males all of a sudden leap out of the woodwork calling "foul." You have pretty thin skin when it comes to what you consider "verbal abuse" of you, don't you?
Yours most sincerely,
Wythe W. Holt, Jr.
University Research Professor of Law
University of Alabama School of Law
---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "Learner"
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 13:28:02 -0500
Dr. Holt,
Again, thanks for your quick response.
I would suggest what I thought obvious. My original e-mail was addressed to someone other than yourself.
However, the fact that I sent a copy to you ought obviously to imply that I have no problem with you either reading or responding (and I appreciate you doing both).
The only reason for noting that it was not addressed to you was to wonder at the acerbic tone of your reply, since no criticism of you was implicit in my first. I had thought a response from the academy would be, well, more academic in tone.
However, I will make one observation on your last -- I note the frequent descriptive term "bigot" and its cognates. I wonder if a previous generation of university administrators might use a different term to the same effect -- "blasphemy." In the past, dissenting opinions were "blasphemous" but now they are "bigoted." Both terms are rather effective labels to stifle the expression of the undesired opinion.
Please don't take my lame attempts at sophistry too seriously. I'm sure, in the final analysis that they are merely the rantings of a fool who wishes he were worthy of office, title and robes. I suppose that it was my initial blaspheme that called forth your almost abusive first response.
Please forgive my blaspheme. I wonder if verbal abuse is still a sin in the academy.
D.Nance
The brainwashing never ends.
More to the point: If the South secedes, those left-wing, freedom hating, socialist pigs had better catch the first fast plane out of town.
That rubber buckshot shouldn't be mixin' with the others.
What's the second from the left - a flare or flamethrower round?
Make sure ya click the pic and visit Olegs site. Primo , Excellent IMHO !!........
Stay Safe Dude !!...........:o)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.