Judges uphold right to carry hidden guns {CINCINNATI}

http://www.cincypost.com/ ^ | April 10 2002 | By Kimball Perry, Post staff reporter

[supercat]

Nice decision. It is an interesting irony that the concealed-carry statutes many people have worked for may end up preventing Ohio from becoming a 'Vermont carry' state. Not that I blame those who invested time and money convincing the legislature to pass those statutes, but it would have been interesting if they hadn't done so and Ohio got Vermont carry due to the failure of legislators to provide an alternative.

[185JHP]

The riots in Cincinnati didn't spread into NKY back in the 60's, either. They might have been thugs, but they weren't totally stupid...

[pierrem15]

A judge actually said, ''There is no doubt that the . . . Consti tution grants citizens the right to bear arms,''

Ahhhh, my heart...

[B4Ranch]

LOL

[B4Ranch]

Who reminded the judges that EACH state has a Constitution?

[B4Ranch]

The events of 9/11 hopefully.

Wouldn't that be just great?

[Critter]

From the Connecticut Constitution:

"Every citizen has a right to bear arms in defense of himself and the state."

Yet, when CT passed it's own version of the 93 assault weapons ban, the CT supreme court held that the ban was constitutional, because the state was not banning all arms, only certain arms. We still have a right to bear bolt action, lever action and certain semi automatic arms in defense of ourselves and the state.

A constitution cannot be written clearly and simple enough to not be vulnerable to perversion by a corrupt, communist legislature and judiciary.

[2Trievers]

Super to see you back Jim! Welcome home ... missed you! Hugs, 2T &;-)