Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Father posts bail for Ruth Christine in child kidnapping
Oregonlive.com ^ | 4/12/02 | AP

Posted on 04/12/2002 6:55:25 PM PDT by RGSpincich

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
To: Demidog
Which activist was banned? As I recall Micheal, who's family survived the holocaust was called a Nazi and an anti-semite (LOL) by some of the same people on this thread and JR believed them.

It's the recollection of others that you have your facts backwards. JR makes his own decisions. On several occasions it was "lightstream" who trotted out the Nazi bs.

61 posted on 04/14/2002 5:10:21 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
The children had already been taken. Thus your idiocy knows no bounds apparently. The people of Grant's pass gave Brian and Ruth support and even a place to live.

Above you claimed that there was no threat that the kids removal would be permanente. So they were trying to work out a solution. The t-shirted protestors trying to intimidate the court and the Social Services submarined any chance the Christines had. It was the idiocy of those in Grant's Pass that showed no bounds. Oh yeah, I'm sure Brian really appreciates the lovely accomodations that his friends have arranged.

Steele was not called anything by me but he was certainly not revered by me either. Prove your allegation or give it a rest. Even Steele gets it right about the Grant's Pass crowd, why don't you?

62 posted on 04/14/2002 5:22:53 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
The fact that they don't have 50G's or so to post bail is not an indication that they didn't support the Christines.

Brian's bail is $500k. Ruth's bail was only $50k. How's about only $5K to get her out? Or how about a Deed of Trust in favor of the court on the real property of one of these fine folks. Just need $50k in equity and the fees would be minimal. Not much to ask for, considering.

Doesn't say much for her supporters or for your contention that there was overwhelming support for the Christines in the community.

63 posted on 04/14/2002 7:57:03 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich;Demidog
How's about only $5K to get her out?

$5,000!? That's a whole case of Meisterbrau every day for the last year!!!

64 posted on 04/14/2002 10:56:08 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
You and Roscoe have accused Steele of being a neo-Nazi so I find it hillarious that you consider his statements to be credible in this one particular instance.

I find it hillarious that you are more concerned with my opinion of Steele than Steele's opinion of your friends in Grant's Pass. Recalling the facts accurately is not your long suit, you tried to pass off Steele's defense of the Aryan Nation as a First Amendment case. I corrected you by reminding you that two people were assaulted by the Aryan Nation security forces and they were suing for damages. No mention of Neos.

Call Sieradzki he likes to tell those German war stories. His family surviving that time period is his claim to fame and he flaunts it. Check out the link here and scroll to the Star of David, he puts it front and center at every turn. He acted as though it gave him special privilege to call others "Nazi".

BTW when you talk to him, ask about the total financial meltdown this country is going to suffer at the hands of the government and powerful business community. It was scheduled to happen immediately after Y2K according to him. As a result of a conspiracy (surprise) and not Y2k problems. Y2K was going to be used as cover. Sieradzki and another vocal Christine supporter, Paul Walter, wrote an article on this subject. To say Sieradzki and Walter have a unique perspective does not do them justice. These guys are lunatics and they were leading the charge for the Christines.

Excerpt:The coming economic collapse

by Paul Walter and editor Michael Sieradzki

The greatest financial rip-off in recorded history is now underway. This scheme makes the recent $80 Billion Savings & Loan robbery [*] seem like a dip into mama's cookie jar. In fact, the magnitude of the shift in assets from you to the powerful few will dwarf the 1929 stock market and depression era crash. The foundation of this scheme rests on the corruption of our judicial system, our politician's dependence on money and media to get elected, and the public addiction to debt, handouts and the illusion of wealth based on hyper-inflated stock and bond markets.

You will know this Great Heist is at hand when the controlled mass media blasts your heart with fear-inducing stories on TV, radio and in news print using words like "chaos", "panic" and "sell everything"! If you plan to act then, it will be too late. All your assets, bank accounts and income sources will evaporate in a flood of pain.

Right now, while you sleep, the powerful few who heartlessly lead you to this disaster, are busy at work protecting their assets and making themselves immune from any retribution by an outraged public. Let's examine the hypocrisy and deceit surrounding the contrived Y2K computer problem.[*]

Note how the media, institutions and corporations say there is no real problem, while on the other hand, politicians, lawyers and crafty judges are silently passing laws to protect themselves and their cohorts in the powerful corporations against loss and law suits resulting from Y2K-related problems and complications [*]. You, on the other hand, will be totally helpless should you suffer a serious loss.

The cruelty of this massive and contrived deception is that the Y2K laws now on the books protect the powerful few against citizens seeking redress of grievance against those benefiting from and responsible for the financial theft. The financial collapse which would have occurred with or without Y2K will be masked as a Y2K issue and those responsible for the disaster will hide behind newly passed legal immunity. The banks, corporations, insurance companies, utilities, etc., will invoke the law to protect their assets while the people are stripped naked.

The rest of the story

65 posted on 04/14/2002 11:18:51 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
$5,000!? That's a whole case of Meisterbrau every day for the last year!!!

Ruth's dad must not be a big beer drinker. /s

66 posted on 04/15/2002 7:12:49 AM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich
The t-shirted protestors trying to intimidate the court

There you go again. Your dishonesty precludes any chance for meaningful debate. Good day.

67 posted on 04/15/2002 12:46:36 PM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich
BTW when you talk to him, ask about the total financial meltdown this country is going to suffer at the hands of the government and powerful business community.

Earth to Spinmeister: We're in the midst of a financial meltdown. AT&T and IBM are about to topple. Sun is in dire financial straights. Regardless of what spin is coming from the current administration if you aren't prepared for a major fallout, you're not paying attention. Many people were wrong about the gravity of the Y2K situation. Including apparently Michael. Alot of the Y2K hysteria occurred here at FR.

How this relates to this particular incident is known only to you and I won't pretend to be clairvoyant enough to decipher your bizarre need to bring it up.

68 posted on 04/15/2002 12:50:42 PM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
You're a baiter. I hope it makes you proud. Obviously you find some benefit in the practice else you wouldn't continue it.
69 posted on 04/15/2002 12:51:53 PM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
There you go again. Your dishonesty precludes any chance for meaningful debate. Good day.

T-Shirt link

From the article:

"It's been the parents at every turn in this adventure who have delayed, been neglectful, been arrogant, and indicated no interest in cooperating," Wolke said.

He added that Brian Christine's mother should not be considered for custody, because she had lied to police seeking the fourth daughter after the abduction. Coon refused to hear from the dozen people in the courtroom who regularly picket the courthouse in support of the Christines. Four of them wore T-shirts saying, "Danger. Who protects us from our protectors."

70 posted on 04/15/2002 3:26:11 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich
Ummm...are you aware who Wolke is? He works for CPS and "represents the children."

His job is to make sure that CPS wishes get enacted and he is also extremely unethical by making such statements to the press. As I said, you are dishonest.

71 posted on 04/15/2002 3:35:37 PM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
We're in the midst of a financial meltdown.

Evidently you buy into the government conspiracy angle, too. Michael wasn't suffering from Y2K hysteria. He was suffering from anti-government and anti-business hysteria. He said it was a conspiracy that would happen no matter what real problems Y2K produced. The Y2K thing was going to be used for cover. Far different than the run of the mill hysteria that was out there.

The subject was brought up because he and Paul Walter are two of a few vocal Christine supporters. They were advising the Christines, also. You maintain that the Christine supporters are rational. Evidently, that won't change. I say they are not rational and see a government conspiracy behind every tree.

72 posted on 04/15/2002 3:47:46 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich
This story is about to blow up. Watch the Today show Thursday. There are no X-Rays to prove the original charges. This story is going to break nationally. SCF was thrown out of the Indiana and Montana courts.

Shawn Brink has been removed. Her son was a drug dealer. Go figure.

The two infants went with Brian's mom. The other three are with Ruth's parents. Dateline is going to do a piece if Ruth can get permission to leave Oregon.

You're going to have to work overtime to spin it. Oh and by the way, Michael says you're a clown.

73 posted on 04/15/2002 3:48:54 PM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
Michael says you're a clown.

Sorry to hear that. I do hope Ruth does leave Oregon to be in some other spot with her kids.

The rest is old news. As I said before, Michael wrote that were Xrays showing an old injury. If now he says something else, oh well. It still doesn't change the other aspects of the case.

74 posted on 04/15/2002 4:00:54 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich
Michael wrote that were Xrays showing an old injury.

That's what the Dr. wrote in his report. However, there were no such Xrays and Michael assumed that there were because of what the Dr. said.

This case is going to bust wide open and those of us who have noticed that there was never any evidence that the Christines had caused any harm to their children will be vindicated. Because there never was any such evidence. The entire premise for the removal of the children was based on lies.

75 posted on 04/15/2002 4:05:00 PM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
Lucky for Ruth that her Father posted her bail.

The "Sovereign White Citizen" crowd wasn't about to part with its beer money, no matter how long she waited.

76 posted on 04/16/2002 12:33:35 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Watch the Today show on Thursday, troll.
77 posted on 04/16/2002 12:36:38 AM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
Why wait till Thursday? Tell me how much they raised.
78 posted on 04/16/2002 12:39:00 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
BTW, did you share your "discovery" with them that they didn't need a marriage license since they were both white?
79 posted on 04/16/2002 12:44:27 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
To: TruthWillWin

And Kidnapping at gunpoint is a good idea?

Ask the state. They seem to think so.

29 posted on 4/13/02 6:55 AM Hawaii-Aleutian by Demidog

TWW...'Truth' from hell!

80 posted on 04/16/2002 12:46:54 AM PDT by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson