Pregnant 10-Year-Old Blames Godfather,' 75

Connecticut Post ^ | 4/18/02 | Daniel Tepfer

[maxwell]

If your post is serious, then you are one sick piece of work. How can a 10 year-old be "slutty"? And if the 10 year-old were "slutty," what's wrong with the old man that he hasn't the decency to "resist"? (How hard can it be to resist a 10 year-old's "advances"?) You are revolting.

That a 10-year-old girl would deserve any of the blame -- let alone the "slut" label -- is just too much. Something tells me there's more to your posts than meets the eye, Max.

And by that statement you're implying what?

Y'all are getting me wrong. I'm not trying to acquit the old pervert of any of the blame. I'm exploring possibilities, and in this time and age and the way kids are in this society, the possibility does exist that the old man was telling the truth about the girl seducing him. Though Clara Lou is right; if that were the case, he should not have pursued further action in that course.

Until I see more evidence about this case, I will consider all possibilities, when I do actually think about this case. Which is not much.

So y'all can lay off with the "Max you sick B@ST@RD" comments until you have sufficient evidence to rule out any precocious promiscuity on the part of the girl.

[maxwell]

I would blame the kid not too many are horny at that age.

Well like I told them two fingerpointers up above, you can't sit here and exculpate the old man. He was a perv either way, whether the girl seduced him or not.

[Lois]

Wonder what the odds are that the old man used government-supplied Viagra?

[notyourregularhandle]

Original story posted HERE

On a more serious note...how in the HELL can you say a 10 year old SEDUCED THIS MAN????!!!! Can a ten year old seduce you into having sex??? THIS IS DISGUSTING, AND THE ONLY PERSONS THAT ARE AT FAULT ARE THE MOTHER AND THE PEDOPHILE GRANDFATHER WITH A PREVIOUS SEXUAL ASSAULT RECORD!!!!

I'm goig to go puke (again) now...

[Clara Lou]

"He [the dirty old man] said his door is always open for the victim," the prosecutor said.
I'll just bet it is.

[maxwell]

Does anybody watch the news? Does anybody know what kids are like these days?

Fine. The innocent angel wasn't at fault at all and I am just jaded. Have it yer way.

Do note that Enterprise was the only one who tried to discredit my argument/speculations without implying that I personally am a perv or something for considering the line of thought that I did. Food for thought.

[notyourregularhandle]

I don't think I did...but hey, i don't want to be too right... ;)

I do agree with you that kid's are CORNY MISGUIDED SKANKS...(yes, i'm generalizing...) these days...it has a lot to do with the CORNY MISGUIDED SKANK PARENTS... ;) (btw "skank" is deemed OK to use...the court said so)

[maxwell]

(btw "skank" is deemed OK to use...the court said so)

Bwahaha... Yeah I read that too... Ya chicken butt... ;)

Well thank you for that vindication. I am a perv but not THAT kind of perv. Gawd no. And with those closing remarks I am going to get my happy Republican a$$ out of here before the mod squad gets on and tries to have me drawn and quartered...

[newgeezer]

> Something tells me there's more to your posts than meets the eye, Max.

And by that statement you're implying what?

That, hopefully, you would reveal the hidden logic behind your point. Otherwise, you left yourself open to the not-totally-unreasonable conclusion that you might be, as one observer put it, "one sick piece of work."

I'm not trying to acquit the old pervert of any of the blame. I'm exploring possibilities, and in this time and age and the way kids are in this society, the possibility does exist that the old man was telling the truth about the girl seducing him. Though Clara Lou is right; if that were the case, he should not have pursued further action in that course.

See, there it is. You're not the (your words) sick B@ST@RD that some people feared.

Until I see more evidence about this case, I will consider all possibilities

In your post #2, the only possibility you mentioned concerning the 10-year-old girl was that she "sounds slutty." Surely you weren't surprised when that prompted others to consider the possibility that you're a "sick piece of work." :-)

[Clara Lou]

maxwell,
I do not think you are a "perv." (And I realize my earlier post to you made it sound that way.) I do think you represent a typical group of males who are always ready to be sure that the female victim gets a share of the blame-- no matter the situation. Whether the victim here was "slutty" or not has no bearing on the old man's actions. Speculation on the 10 year-old's behavior should never have some up.

[PLMerite]

AND The Womens clinic didn't bother to notify the Police.!! My God...

Of course not...abortion is a *right* don't you know? /sarcasm

Can you imagine how many underage girls they must "treat"?

What would happen to their business if they reported every pregnant 14-year-old to the cops?

[notyourregularhandle]

"Speculation on the 10 year-old's behavior should never have some up."

Very good point...

[newgeezer]

"Speculation on the 10 year-old's behavior should never have some up."

Very good point...

Here is perhaps the ultimate test of whether it's even remotely fair to consider: Would a slimy defense attorney for the old fart have the gall to bring it up in court? Anywhere? (Okay, except for F. Lee Bailey and LA.)

[RepubMommy]

I can't decide who's lying... The kid sounds slutty, and the old man's just a downright perv...

Slutty? LOL, she's TEN!

[Nonstatist]

Later, when she fell asleep in his apartment, she awakened to find Kave on top of her, having sexual intercourse with her. She said he told her not to tell anyone or she wouldn't be allowed to visit him anymore.

Say what?? Does this ring true to anybody? Why would she keep coming back to visit?

She sounds like a confused little girl exploited by a total creep. Yecch

[Clara Lou]

So y'all can lay off with the "Max you sick B@ST@RD" comments until you have sufficient evidence to rule out any precocious promiscuity on the part of the girl.
In re-reading your posts I find that I missed the above sentence from your last post. As I said, I don't think you are a "pervert"-- which was your word, not mine. I just appears to me that you might be classified as what is not so affectionately know as a d***head, because, as previously stated, the behavior of a 10 year-old girl does not dictate the behavior of a grown man, except in your little mind. (I apologize to everyone but Maxwell for using even the starred version of the above word, but, this particular situation screams for correct terminology.)