Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge denies "choice of evils" defense (All Christine Trial Updates)
Oregonlive.com ^ | 5/2/02 | JEFF BARNARD AP

Posted on 05/02/2002 2:19:56 PM PDT by RGSpincich

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 461-464 next last
To: RGSpincich
Another corrupt judge to support the corrupt State. Can't decent wack-job parents raise their children however they see fit ? Whats a little slapping around of children, food deprivation and kidnapping among friends compared to an out of control state employee ?
21 posted on 05/02/2002 5:18:41 PM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
Another corrupt judge to support the corrupt State.

With a corrupt jury being chosen as we speak.

22 posted on 05/02/2002 5:37:56 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Is it just me, or is f.Christian not particularly relevant?

No, it's not just you.

23 posted on 05/02/2002 7:44:52 PM PDT by TruthWillWin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich
Lasswell also denied a defense motion to suppress evidence the children were malnourished and one had been knocked down stairs by her father.

How can this be? Posters from previous threads have been insisting that there is no evidence that the children were not being properly cared for.

24 posted on 05/02/2002 7:50:09 PM PDT by TruthWillWin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich
The judge wasn't biting.

Steele's argument got broomed? The Christines are toast because of all the admissions they've made. I'm still with the jury out 2 hours--IF they take a lunch break & cig break that adds up to 1 1/2 hours.

25 posted on 05/02/2002 7:58:06 PM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TruthWillWin
This was a motion in limne, a motion to limit or suppress evidence/testimony. This is a standard motion defense attorneys file, but are successful in about 10% to 25% of the cases. I have seen defense attorneys granted the motion in limne, then see it all go buh-bye when one of their witnesses open the door to the suppressed evidence/testimony when the defense witness (and sometimes the attorney) brings up the evidence/testimony suppressed.
26 posted on 05/02/2002 8:03:44 PM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: WIMom
Walmart has camping facilities in many of their parking lots. My parents travel with a motor home and often when in large cities, they stay there. Most of the time it's free.

Well, um, not exactly camping facilities. Most Walmarts--usually the Superstores, open 24 hours--look the other way when it comes to a few campers & RV's parked in their lot. I distinctly remember some municipalities in Florida banning overnight parking/camping at Walmarts & I saw a sign that banned overnight parking/camping at a Walmart in Panama City a couple years ago. I've also seen RV's parked in Walmarts around here. No one really cares.

27 posted on 05/02/2002 8:10:29 PM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TruthWillWin
Posters from previous threads have been insisting that there is no evidence that the children were not being properly cared for.

I see some of them changing their tune on a variety of subjects. One, who posted to you last August, said that the reported weights of the girls had to be bogus. He said that the reported weights were "not at all healthy even on a vegitarian diet." The same guy now says the weights were normal given the diet of the Christines.

28 posted on 05/02/2002 9:46:47 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: WIMom
I was wondering what was meant by "pubic" parking lot. Walmart is very camper friendly, for instance, they know where you are going to spend your money.
Generally, police seem to honor the idea that the cab of a motor home is searchable in the same manner that the "lunge area" of a car is, but respect the notion that the area 'back of the line' of the motor home or bus, is a home, and if one has the bluster to stick to that, they should have to have a warrant. Any old hippy should be able to argue this.
Folks I know generally feel it is worth one parent sacrificing some freedom for "obstruction" or whatever while the other gets the children out of harm's way and over the nearest border. Seen too many foster kids to feel that it is a good system, or even acceptable compared to the home left behind.
29 posted on 05/02/2002 9:58:08 PM PDT by Apogee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Apogee
I was wondering what was meant by "pubic" parking lot.

That's a rough one. ; )

The parking lot issue was a sidelight, IMO, the police were given permission to enter the motorhome.

30 posted on 05/03/2002 7:09:33 AM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw ; Roscoe ; TruthWillWin ; Poohbah ; Demidog ; Three Year Lurker ;
Christine Trial Update
By: Kelli Warner

More wrangling today in the case of an Oregon couple accused of taking their daughters from state social workers at gunpoint. Today the judge ruled the daughters of Ruth and Brian Christine can be called to testify in the trial if they pass a competency hearing, which tests their ability to know right from wrong and the importance of telling the truth.

Prosecutors have reserved the right to call all three girls to testify, but defense lawyers believe the prosecution is primarily interested in questioning the couples oldest daughter, Bethany, who was five at the time of the alleged crime last year.

Link

31 posted on 05/03/2002 12:49:04 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion ;ex-Texan
Update at #31 Bump
32 posted on 05/03/2002 12:54:16 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich
When the defense is fighting like crazy to keep the daughters from testifying, or trying to keep incriminating evidence from being introduced, or trying to say that "Yeah, he did it, BUT..."

Well, they're probably going to lose, badly.

33 posted on 05/03/2002 12:54:28 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Well, they're probably going to lose, badly.

That figures. Steele predicted victory on Day One.

34 posted on 05/03/2002 1:07:35 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich

And now they have a jury.  

Jury seated in Christines' trial

By JEFF BARNARD
The Associated Press
5/3/02 3:36 PM

ROSEBURG, Ore. (AP) -- A jury was seated Friday in the trial of Ruth and Brian Christine, who are charged with taking their three daughters at gunpoint from child welfare workers.

A panel of nine women and three men was chosen after defense attorney Edgar Steele and prosecutor Rick Wesenberg questioned a pool of 38 people over the course of two days on subjects that included their attitudes about fundamental Christians, state child welfare agencies, and whether religious beliefs could justify breaking the law.

The Christines, both 29, face charges of kidnapping, robbery, custodial interference and unauthorized use of a motor vehicle.

The state maintains that on Aug. 1, Brian Christine threatened two child welfare workers with a gun at an Interstate 5 rest stop as the workers were driving the Christines' children -- Bethany, then 6; Lydia, 4, and Miriam, 3 -- back to a foster home following a birthday visit with their parents in Grants Pass.

According to police, Brian Christine took the state van with the girls in it to a nearby lumber yard, where he met up with his wife and a friend. They then switched cars, and escaped to Montana, where they were all found a few days later, police said.

The defense maintains that the couple was rescuing their children from a rogue state agency, the Department of Human Services, after having their children unjustly taken from them a year earlier.

Steele has described the couple as fundamental Christians, and the couple testified in a pretrial hearing that they occasionally fasted as a family for breakfast and lunch as a religious practice.

Authorities took the three girls from the Christines on July 31, 2000 after police, tipped by an anonymous caller, questioned them in their bus, parked behind the library in Grants Pass. Police decided the girls were malnourished and one of them, Lydia, had been hit by her father so that she fell down the stairs, cutting her forehead.

The couple face another trial scheduled for July in Grants Pass on charges alleging they mistreated the girls by withholding food, that Brian Christine had assaulted Lydia, and that Ruth Christine had withheld medical treatment from Lydia.

Just before court convened for the day, Steele accidentally struck himself in the eye with the end of an elastic cord while unpacking documents, causing a short delay. Wesenberg told the potential jurors that he was mopping sweat from his brow because he had a fever.

Copyright 2002 Associated Press. All rights reserved.

35 posted on 05/03/2002 1:26:57 PM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
You're quick today. ; )

Steele has described the couple as fundamental Christians, and the couple testified in a pretrial hearing that they occasionally fasted as a family for breakfast and lunch as a religious practice.

Is it religion or is it rationing? I haven't heard of this religous practice.

36 posted on 05/03/2002 1:38:09 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
I'm wondering what happened to Matt Gerawan, the alleged accomplice, he was scheduled to go on trial with the Christines. But that was before Steele came back into the picture. Guess Gerawan's lawyer had little trouble convincing a judge to try him seperately.
37 posted on 05/03/2002 1:51:11 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich
I just googled "Matt Gerawan" and there's very little trace of him. Does Oregon have its court records on line?

The usual fast is not to eat during the day, but after sundown/the evening meal broke the fast.

38 posted on 05/03/2002 1:57:44 PM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
The usual fast is not to eat during the day, but after sundown/the evening meal broke the fast.

Okay but it seems a little tough on small kids.

39 posted on 05/03/2002 2:05:25 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
Does Oregon have its court records on line?

I can only find the old stuff, 1980's and back. Don't see any RACER listings for Douglas County.

40 posted on 05/03/2002 2:15:11 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 461-464 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson