Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The rise of neo-paganism (No, this one is NOT SATIRE)
National Review Online ^ | 27th September 1999 | Roger Scruton

Posted on 05/04/2002 7:45:25 PM PDT by Tomalak

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-217 next last
To: Tomalak
>>Well, I agree with you. And here is the crunch. Does it 
>>make a positive impact on society to have witchcraft 
>>revered as some sort of realistic, respectable doctrine? 

I have no problem with "witchcraft" being recognized as a legitimate religious faith ... assuming the exercise of that religion does not harm an individual or society. If you can show me where it does harm, I'm all ears.

>>To have Wiccans honestly (in their mind) describe 
>>their cult as some sort of morally based ideal? I think 
>>it is in society's interest that such people be 
>>countered. Surely you agree that Christianity must be 
>>supreme above pagan, immoral superstition?

Well, since I consider all faith-based religions/institutions to be man-made, I don't agree that Christianity is supreme above anything.

I believe in one God, and no more; and I hope for happiness beyond this life.

I do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish church, by the Roman church, by the Greek church, by the Turkish church, by the Protestant church, nor by any church that I know of. My own mind is my own church.

Every national church or religion has established itself by pretending some special mission from God, communicated to certain individuals. The Jews have their Moses; the Christians their Jesus Christ, their apostles and saints; and the Turks their Mahomet, as if the way to God was not open to every man alike.

Each of those churches show certain books, which they call revelation, or the word of God. The Jews say, that their word of God was given by God to Moses, face to face; the Christians say, that their word of God came by divine inspiration: and the Turks say, that their word of God (the Koran) was brought by an angel from Heaven. Each of those churches accuse the other of unbelief; and for my own part, I disbelieve them all.

---Thomas Paine


21 posted on 05/04/2002 8:27:12 PM PDT by LiberalBuster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: discostu
Do you actually know anything about Wicca? Of course not. The highest precept of their faith is "do no harm". Not a bad start for a moral foundation I think.

"Do no harm" is the start and finish of Wiccan morality. As Roger Scruton said, this is not an ethical doctrine at all, but modern liberal ideas in their most basic form. It means that there is no right and wrong, beyond the harm you do to others, and that you have no responsibilities to God or anyone else to do what is right. Abortion and buggery are, therefore, a normal part of a pleasure-driven way of life. That is an empty and stupid doctrine if ever I heard one.

22 posted on 05/04/2002 8:30:02 PM PDT by Tomalak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: discostu
I'm with you. I'm an agnostic and quite amused by the bashing of all things non-Christian. Thomas Jefferson would have some serious contentions with so-called "conservatives" on FR ... who seem incapable of recognizing that people can practice a non-Christian (or no) religion without being the enemy of America.
23 posted on 05/04/2002 8:33:26 PM PDT by LiberalBuster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Tomalak
Sory bub Wicca goes a lot deeper into morality than that. And "do no harm" would be pretty kick ass all by itself. As for right and wrong well guess what, they ARE defined by your effect on those around you. Abortion does harm no good. Buggery doesn't and more importantly isn't anyones business outside the people involved. You want to talk about empty and stupid? How about filling the internet with self righteous BS that drives people away from your perfect little religion. Like I said before, instead of spending all your time decrying beliefs you're too narrow minded to understand maybe you should be figuring out why Christianity is losing believers.
24 posted on 05/04/2002 8:35:11 PM PDT by discostu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: discostu
To say the nation was founded by Puritans is also ignoring places like the Colony of Virginia (which was Catholic) and a few other.

Not exactly right. VA was never Catholic, unless you mean Anglo-Catholic (Anglican). MD was indeed founded by Catholics, but was taken over later by radical Protestants who persecuted the original Catholic settlers.

I don't believe Roman Catholicism was ever the established Church of any of the colonies, except perhaps for a short period in MD.

Instead of decrying all this supposed evil these people need to be asking themselves why people are fleeing Christianity in droves.

Actually, they're not. It's just that most of them are leaving "mainline" churches and going to evangelical and conservative groups. This trend has been underway for decades. Such churches are not "respectable" in the eyes of most of the litterati. Those who join them promptly become invisible (as being beneath contempt) to the chattering classes.

25 posted on 05/04/2002 8:36:17 PM PDT by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Restorer
>>Not exactly right. VA was never Catholic, unless you 
>>mean Anglo-Catholic (Anglican). MD was indeed founded by 
>>Catholics, but was taken over later by radical 
>>Protestants who persecuted the original Catholic settlers.
Who cares? The whole point is that it shouldn't matter what religon people do or do not practice to be considered a good citizen. Whether Virginia was founded by Catholics or not is moot. More important is Jefferson's religous liberty legislation that kept the state out of religion entirely. Those of you who complain about Wiccanism have the burden of showing how it negatively impacts society ... not why you disagree with it (theologically).
26 posted on 05/04/2002 8:43:10 PM PDT by LiberalBuster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: discostu
Like I said before, instead of spending all your time decrying beliefs you're too narrow minded to understand

Sorry, but if you think Wiccans are pro-life it is you who doesn't understand them. And how any objective person of civilised faith can consider Wiccan "morality" something worth taking seriously is unimaginable.

27 posted on 05/04/2002 8:44:44 PM PDT by Tomalak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: LiberalBuster
I love how obsessed they are with telling people what's in their mind, it's one of the greatest proofs against parapsychology ever. If they want to know why people are leaving Christianity for Wicca instead of claiming Wicca is putting the masses under some evil spell they should look at the face Christianity presents.

The face of Christianity to those on the outside (or at the door deciding which way to go) is people like Cardinal Law, Jim and Tammy Faye Baker, Pat Robertson (who is a good guy most of the time, but he only gets secular press when he sticks his foot in it, and when he sticks his foot in it he REALLY sticks that foot in the proverbial IT) and people like Chesterson casting aspersions on people they know nothing about.

They need to ask themselves, now that Chesterson has told me that I'm so stupid I'll believe in any old dorky thing put in front of me why should I believe in Christianity? If I had children why should I risk them being molested at the hands of people that will be protected by Cardinal Law? Why should I give money to people like the Bakers? Why would I align myself with someone that claimed God killed 3000+ Americans because we no longer burn sodomites? Why should I hookup with people like our poster who's obviously never read a single Wiccan text and calls it's philosphy empty and stupid? Maybe instead of joining these people I should check out this thing they fear so much, maybe I should investigate Wicca on my own, maybe they have other reasons to fear Wicca.

28 posted on 05/04/2002 8:45:54 PM PDT by discostu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: discostu
Your comment IS the satire, right? ...Or are you serious?

God almighty what has this forum come to...

29 posted on 05/04/2002 8:47:46 PM PDT by gg188
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tomalak
Those of you who complain about Wiccanism have the burden of showing how it negatively impacts society.

Sorry. Wicca is a cult that encourages liberalism, moral relativism, witchcraft, abortion, homosexuality, lesbianism, feminism and the idea that your daughter can screw around as much as she likes without it mattering a jot. I think some of us assumed that this was so obviously a negative impact on society that it went without saying.

30 posted on 05/04/2002 8:50:04 PM PDT by Tomalak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: discostu
>>I love how obsessed they are with telling people 
>>what's in their mind, it's one of the greatest proofs 
>>against parapsychology ever.

I really don't care. Each of you should be able to practice your respective religions (or no religion) ... assuming the practice thereof does not incur damage on the person or property of others. Many people seem incapable of seperating their private theology from the public sphere.

31 posted on 05/04/2002 8:50:55 PM PDT by LiberalBuster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Tomalak
>>Sorry. Wicca is a cult that encourages liberalism, moral 
>>relativism, witchcraft, abortion, homosexuality, 
>>lesbianism, feminism and the idea that your daughter can 
>>screw around as much as she likes without it mattering a 
>>jot.

Where would you like to start proving all of this? Hint: Your mere assertions do not constitute fact/proof.

32 posted on 05/04/2002 8:52:31 PM PDT by LiberalBuster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

Comment #33 Removed by Moderator

To: discostu
Virginia wasn't Catholic- you're likely thinking of Maryland. Virginia, I believe, was pretty Episcopal. The Southern colonies were largely Presbyterian, and later Baptist and Methodist, with various others thrown in, especially along the seaboard. And, I might note, the South never did like the now hated Puritans- and only part of it was slavery. New Englander's tended to have a dim view of Southern culture as a whole.
34 posted on 05/04/2002 8:54:00 PM PDT by Cleburne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Restorer
Thanks. It's been a while since I read that stuff (old age creeps up fast). That's why I like FR, somebody always knows better than you.

As for the meltdown of the public face of Christianity you're quite right. It's only in those older more "established" churches. On the day of the national prayer vigil for the 9-11 victims I had to drive home from work and back during the prayer vigil, on my way I drove by 3 churches: one a large church of some flavor of Protestant, two little knock offs of completely unknown variety (one is named the Church of the Cosmic Christ, I'm not making this up; the other is actually where I voted in the GOP primary on 9-11 and I first heard what was going on). The big Protestant church was almost empty maybe 5 cars in the lot; the other two were packed.

35 posted on 05/04/2002 8:55:31 PM PDT by discostu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Comment #36 Removed by Moderator

To: LiberalBuster
Where would you like to start proving all of this? Hint: Your mere assertions do not constitute fact/proof.

They make no secret of any of this. It is part of Wiccan belief. Just ask anyone who knows about it.

37 posted on 05/04/2002 8:57:21 PM PDT by Tomalak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Cleburne
Amazing, even then New England thought they were better than everybody else. Thanks for the corrected info.
38 posted on 05/04/2002 8:58:06 PM PDT by discostu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: toddhisattva
Nice to see you are your typical obnoxious self.

Stupid? You personify the definition with your bigoted, perverse, and simple little mind. You couldn't debate yourself out of a wet paper bag, but you sure know how to sling your petty insults toward Catholicsm and christianity in general. You make me sick.

39 posted on 05/04/2002 8:58:43 PM PDT by JMJ333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: discostu
Actually, that's incorrect. The Putritans were an offshoot of the Anglican church, and they felt the Anglican Church was becoming too liberal, and they started to have their own worship services. They wanted to remove the influence of centuries of Catholicism, ordinances, liturgy, an established priesthood and such, from regular worship. That means they wanted to PURIFY the church, that is why they are called Puritans. The state church of England licensed ministers, and these Puritans held meetings in their own, non state churches or houses, and some were imprisoned. The Pilgrims left because they wanted to practice Christianity according to their conscience, and to escape the persecution of the Anglican Church. Persecution was certainly a part of the reason they left.
40 posted on 05/04/2002 9:03:23 PM PDT by RaceBannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-217 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson