Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House to harvest your cash? Chastain warns Bush to sign bill costing each family thousands
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Thursday, May 9, 2002 | Jane Chastain

Posted on 05/09/2002 12:04:20 AM PDT by JohnHuang2

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: Texasforever
Its called economics. Corporate farms cut the cost because of economies of scale. Small farms cannot compete on that. Also, corporate firms are better able to gauge prices by engaging in the futures market that independent farms do not.
41 posted on 05/09/2002 4:22:58 PM PDT by Satadru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: poet
I see you didn't catch my sarcasm.
42 posted on 05/09/2002 4:27:15 PM PDT by Satadru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: gore_sux
Could somebody tell me the point of vetoing a bill with overwhelming, veto-proof support in both sides of Congress during an election year where critical Senate races are in the Midwest?

Could you tell me why the Senate races are important? Do you mean to say that if the DemocRATs keep the Senate we will get large farm subsidies, 30,000 more government workers at our airports, campaign finance reform, more illegal immigrants, steel and other tariffs? Horrors.

43 posted on 05/09/2002 4:30:49 PM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: jackbill
Could you tell me why the Senate races are important? Do you mean to say that if the DemocRATs keep the Senate we will get large farm subsidies, 30,000 more government workers at our airports, campaign finance reform, more illegal immigrants, steel and other tariffs? Horrors.

Yes, you'll have all that plus income tax increases, gas tax increases, no national defense, no war on terror, more gun laws, no missile defense, expanded government funding of abortions, and a complete ban trucks and SUVs (to name a few)

As the song goes, "you don't know what you got, till its gone."

44 posted on 05/09/2002 4:45:33 PM PDT by gore_sux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Sarasmom
So, more money to corporate famers to grow or not grow whatever they can make the most money with.More local family farms gone.The Government OWNS the food supply.I pay whatever the Government decides is the correct price for food.I can try to cut down on gas and electric consumption, but food is pretty much a required expense And the Government is gearing up to send the abundance of the fruited plains to Zimbabwe,the Middle east and wherever they feel or are directed by the UN to do so, but it is not really my tax dollars or income that is deliberately targeted to re-distribute wealth, and I have never been accused of being wealthy, really just barely getting by, but it's for the children...

Oh, sorry threadreaders.Just trying to sort it all out. I talk to myself at work too.:^)

45 posted on 05/09/2002 5:37:23 PM PDT by sarasmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: ksen
Thanks. Don't you just love those Republicans racing towards small government. Nothing has changed. The pom poms are shaking harder. Click here for #36

Amerika, Amerika

46 posted on 05/09/2002 7:20:21 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: jackbill
"Could you tell me why the Senate races are important?"

"I don’t care if you have proof that he raped a woman, stood up and shot her dead, you’re still not going to get 67 votes."

47 posted on 05/09/2002 7:34:21 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Satadru
OOps, sorry.
48 posted on 05/09/2002 8:55:20 PM PDT by poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: brat
This bill is a disaster. It's buying votes with money.
49 posted on 05/09/2002 9:22:56 PM PDT by Hagrid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hagrid
Bush promises to cut farm bill

Senate Passes Bill to Expand Food Stamps and Farm Aid

Great Myths Of The Great Depression

Farmers Rely on Government Handout


By Steve Brown
May 09, 2002
Source

MCVILLE, N.D. — North Dakota's farming season is notoriously unreliable, with this year's May snowstorms pushing back planting in most of the state.

Luckily, farmers who know they can't count on the weather are sure they can count on the federal government.

"I'd be losing money every year without the government," said Terry Naas, a local farmer.

On Wednesday, the Senate approved 64-35 a 10-year farm bill that ups subsidies by 80 percent, returning them to pre-1996 levels, when the Freedom to Farm Act was passed by Congress in an effort to reduce subsidies on a variety of crops over the next six years.

The flow of federal dollars was supposed to end this year, but the effort to wean farmers off subsidies has instead given way to $83 billion more over the next 10 years, most of it dispersed as payouts to farmers.

The House passed an identical version of the bill last week on a 280-141 vote. It now goes to the president's desk for his signature.

Three years ago, Fox News visited Naas when he was on the verge of leaving his family farm. He said had it not been for $300,000 he received from the federal government since then, he would have quit the business.

It's the same story for most North Dakota farmers. Government payments to grow crops — or not grow them — is the only thing that keeps farmers on the farm.

"How do I say it?" asked Eric Aasmundstad of the North Dakota Farm Bureau. "It's absolutely as critical as blood running through your veins."

The new farm bill has been described as "a little something for everyone." Almost the entire array of American agricultural products are now covered with some form of subsidy, and political analysts say that could be because of the tight election year in 2002.

"Both the Democrats and the Republicans are vying for votes, and one of the ways to vie for votes is to bring more money back home," said Andrew Swenson at North Dakota State University's extension service.

Swenson said that politically-motivated growth in federal subsidies will not be all bad. For one thing, food prices will stay low for consumers.

But already the new crop of subsidies has farmers doing their arithmetic.

"They lowered the loan rate on the soybeans and that was what I was going to plant the most of this year," Naas said.

Naas will then benefit from the late snow covering his farm. It bought him the time needed for Congress to pass the bill so he can calculate which crops will yield him the most government money come harvest time.
[End of Transcript]

Source

And it shall be, that whoso will not come up of all the families of the earth unto Jerusalem to worship the King, the LORD of hosts, even upon them shall be no rain.
Zechariah 14:17

50 posted on 05/09/2002 10:18:08 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: ksen
BTTT
51 posted on 05/11/2002 2:45:50 AM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson