Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ranking of 250 Jobs by Jobs Almanac
http://www.egguevara.com ^ | May 10, 2002 | The Jobs Almanac

Posted on 05/10/2002 12:41:33 PM PDT by geaux

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: geaux
I'm a #4. What is this supposed to mean to me?
41 posted on 05/10/2002 2:03:45 PM PDT by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mcsparkie
Don't they embalm corpses?

In the case of Enron, yes.

42 posted on 05/10/2002 2:14:28 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TomT in NJ
"#2 is way over-rated. I'm an actuary - the profession is OK but #2???

I'm a casualty actuary (FCAS). It must be those life and pension guys that dropped us down to #2 . . .

43 posted on 05/10/2002 2:24:32 PM PDT by Neanderthal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TomT in NJ
I think this is a ranking based on inverse relationship to physical danger, or workplace injuries.

I expect working at any of jobs #240-250 would result in result in more 'ouchies' than any in the first ten, actuary for instance. ;^)

44 posted on 05/10/2002 2:32:41 PM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
I've logged in British Columbia, and you're no lumberjack!! lol
45 posted on 05/10/2002 2:35:51 PM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Our man in washington; BillinDenver
Part of the ranking is based on how hard the job is to get and how hard it is to keep. I guess that's why pro atheletes players are so far down on the list.
46 posted on 05/10/2002 2:50:10 PM PDT by geaux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes; k2blader
Local radio was discussing the list, and he reviewed the different criteria used and how they were weighed. Unfortunately, I failed to grab a pen quick enough to catch it all.
47 posted on 05/10/2002 2:51:54 PM PDT by geaux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
The heck I'm not! I cut down trees, I skip and jump, I like to press wild flowers. I put on women's clothing, And hang around in bars.

Well, OK, I only aspire to lumberjackdom. I don't really cut down trees...

48 posted on 05/10/2002 2:55:27 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: geaux
This is a list of the safest jobs.
49 posted on 05/10/2002 3:14:36 PM PDT by ijcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
I don't really cut down trees.

But you skip and jump, press wild flowers, put on women's clothing, and hang around in bars? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

50 posted on 05/10/2002 3:20:54 PM PDT by geaux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Neanderthal
I'm a casualty (reinsurance) actuary and hopefully after this past Wednesday's test, a new FCAS.
51 posted on 05/10/2002 3:32:55 PM PDT by TomT in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
"I cut down trees..."

That's the 'logging' part. The rest is more of a 'longing' it would appear. Not that there's anything wrong with that!

Seriously, I was lucky enough to spend a few winters back in the '70s falling, bucking, and skidding to the landing a fair whack of trees in northern B.C. Was head-sawyer at a number of gyppo sawmills in the same period.

It'd be fun to swap stories of life in the bush occasionally. ;^)

And of course, how that relates to the restoration of a Free Republic! ;^)

52 posted on 05/10/2002 3:35:09 PM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: geaux
I was an FSA Actuary until 1986, and it sucked. All it did was get me talked to in a way that the management could not have talked to their lowest level file clerk, and got away with it-- and then fired.

The problem is, that that profession has become subdivided into a thousand mini-fields, and in by happenstance your experience falls into any one of them, your only possible alternate employment is in that one or two other jobs in the entire world in your mini-narrow-speciality. If neither of those two other jobs happens to be open, you might as well be a burger flipper.

What is needed is a larger field, that is less specialized, so that your work with (say) cancer patients is not deemed so exclusive that it disqualifies you from consideration for a job with (say) heart or stroke patients.

Or, like accounting, where your tax practice is not deemed SO exclusive as to make you unqualified for some other role in corporate financial management, etc.

There are only some 10,000 or fewer actuaries. Look for a profession that has at least 100,000 people in it, preferably closer to a half million or more.

53 posted on 05/10/2002 3:43:58 PM PDT by crystalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crystalk
Look for a profession that has at least 100,000 people in it, preferably closer to a half million or more.

Ugh; no thanks. I'm pretty sure I've got that now, and it sucks pretty bad as well. I'm a lawyer.

54 posted on 05/10/2002 3:46:29 PM PDT by geaux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Azrael
A place where actors are buried.
55 posted on 05/10/2002 3:48:16 PM PDT by crystalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: crystalk
Of course this list puts a premium on avoidance of outdoor work and of anything that might bring stress or distress upon a person, such as a malpractice suit!

But really, now, a system that puts "Actuary" ahead of "Letter carrier" or "Physician" or "Nurse" or "Nurse Practitioner" or "CRNA Anesthetist" has just failed to take account of supply and demand in the marketplace, plus the ability of the person in the field to just tell his employers to STUFF IT, I am going elsewhere, into independent practice or into another place or another employer...movability, fungibility, etc which was so lacking in Actuarial.

56 posted on 05/10/2002 3:59:59 PM PDT by crystalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: crystalk
You could become a card-counting blackjack player. ;^)
57 posted on 05/10/2002 4:33:04 PM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: geaux
uh, how is waitress and clerk higher on the list than construction worker? (it can't be based on PAY RATES!!!!!!)
58 posted on 05/10/2002 7:54:52 PM PDT by bandlength
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
You're a Catholic priest? Welcome to Free Republic Father! (Mother?!)

ROFLMAO

59 posted on 05/10/2002 8:29:36 PM PDT by varon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: geaux
What number is a FREEPER?
60 posted on 05/10/2002 8:30:57 PM PDT by varon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson