Posted on 05/17/2002 3:52:54 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
Ah, an "amoralist?
Klintons actions were (are) part of the spiritual illness that is infecting this country, as is your "I don't care" attitude.
People are killing thier babies? Hey, as long as they're not hurting ME.
The President is molesting young girls in the Oval Office? Hey, the economy's going good, what do I care?
When the trend in our Republic begins to move toward some or many states banning abortion and the intrusive SCOTUS leaving the laws as written by the states as their right to do so --ban from perhaps after the first two months even, the trend with our fellow Americans will have an opportunity to awaken to the truth that every individual human life begins at conception, that implantation of a unique life is the beginning of a woman's life support for that new, individual life, and that our founding principles embraced the odd notion that life IS endowed by our Creator.
If we will not protect the most vulnerable individual human beings among us, we will fail to thrive as a Republic. I, frankly, don't want to live in a federal state of America. Holding serial killing as a legal and institutionalized 'choice' is as glaring an abuse of central authority as one can imagine ... and it is the slope from which the multitude of aborted human rights flows, depending upon whom holds the power. Is the above too difficult for you to follow?
No society can long claim the term "civilized" if it has no desire to protect its mothers and their unborn. Abortion threatens all of us because it can destroy the very society in which we live.
Still listening...
Then there's always the funny side effects. I should have been able to start drinking and voting nine months earlier (but not at the same time: don't drink and vote, you may elect Republicrats), and my insurance company owes me nine months of higher pre-25 age premiums. You also have to let pregnant women out of jail.
You mean the President is engaging in consensual sex with an adult in the White House. Yes, I do think it's none of our damn business. That person should be held only to his performance as chief executive and nothing else because that's what we elected him for. Not that Clinton did well in this respect either.
Go to your priests for moral examples (must...resist...Catholic...joke...).
And some people aren't allowed to adopt because they don't meet stringent requirements that natural parents aren't subject to.
Oh, you also think that clergy molesting children is funny stuff? Amorality is a wonderful thing, huh.
Now your true side is coming out, figured it would, you can only disguise your left-lean for so long.
SS. I have read many of your posts and it seems you come up on the side of what a democRAT would support.
You could dispel this idea, of being a RAT, if you would reval your voting record.
Coincidence. The Taliban probably banned abortion too, but that doesn't make you one of them, does it? You could dispel this idea, of being a RAT, if you would reval your voting record.
That's quite a private thing. I will tell you I've never registered with the Republicratic party, and my votes usually go to Republicans, Libertarians and independents. I don't have many litmus tests, and they aren't along party lines.
If you can't joke about it, then all hope is lost.
you can only disguise your left-lean for so long.
Excuse me, is there a list somewhere that details exactly what I'm supposed to believe on every subject in order to be "conservative"? If there is, I'm bailing. I refuse to be a sheep.
We're getting off track. Let's just agree the process could use some streamlining and cost-cutting (you could use those several thousand in lawyers fees to take care of the kid), and could use some more babies that would have otherwise been aborted.
The unborn child will continue to be where the mother is regardless of circumastance or location until born.
But I also posted that I was not "condemning anyone, just in this particular case, two lives are involved. Who speaks for the unborn child?", which was ignored. Why does a women's choice to kill her unborn child outweigh that of the father? Why can two parents create a child, but only the mother (and not the father or child) have rights?
SS. Use of the word "Taliban" in an reply.
Another common "RAT" tactic.
As for your voting record, it was a question and if you choose not to reply thats your choice.
BTW Do you vote for candidates that hold your views?
Q: Use of reference to Democrats, liberals or left as a derogatory term.
BTW Do you vote for candidates that hold your views?
No, since they never hold all of my views. As I said, I don't have many litmus tests, so I have to take everything into consideration when voting, and make a balanced decision.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.