Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate probes source of leak
Washington Times ^ | Saturday, May 18, 2002 | By Audrey Hudson and Stephen Dinan

Posted on 05/18/2002 12:15:38 AM PDT by JohnHuang2

Edited on 07/12/2004 3:53:42 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: bonesmccoy
Thanks for the list
21 posted on 05/18/2002 12:35:06 AM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Just BTW, isn't Gary Condit STILL on the House Intelligence Committee? (Or am I getting things all confused again...?)
22 posted on 05/18/2002 12:45:39 AM PDT by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Well crazy Cynthia McKinney is on the International Relations and Military Affairs Committees, mightn't she have gotten access to this information? She certainly has the motivation to make this leak.
23 posted on 05/18/2002 12:52:52 AM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
Indeed, he is. (Supposedly, he's being "investigated" by the House "ethics" committee [yeah, right])
24 posted on 05/18/2002 12:57:03 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
Yes, indeed, my friend. A slew of potential culprits exists on the Dem side.
25 posted on 05/18/2002 12:58:11 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Well, isn't Condit on the House Intelligence Committee until next January? I know he lost the primary, but the elections aren't until this fall, right?
26 posted on 05/18/2002 1:14:32 AM PDT by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
You're exactly right.
27 posted on 05/18/2002 1:15:27 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
There is a definite need to counter attack, get out info that will shut-up the Dems. Here is a good start with this link:

Bin Laden-gate Witness Dares Dems: Depose Me on Clinton 9-11 Cover-up

28 posted on 05/18/2002 1:20:01 AM PDT by goody2shooz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
He's been sooooo quiet, lately, that I have my suspicions...he's bound to be bitter...
29 posted on 05/18/2002 1:24:02 AM PDT by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
This is why Bush chose to severely limit the number of Congressional Intelligence Committee members he briefed. Remember them crying about being shut out of the loop - especially around the crisis de jour - yes, the "SHADOW GOVERNMENT"....? lol

The same thing happened with that TOP SECRET nuclear target scenario that named the countries for which we had contingency plans. I believe that one ended up in the New York Times via the Senate Intelligence Committee as well. Is McCain or Specter on that thing? I'd suspect one of those two rather than a Democrat.

30 posted on 05/18/2002 1:25:12 AM PDT by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
He's been sooooo quiet, lately

Definitely suspicious -- and a clue there's mischief afoot.

31 posted on 05/18/2002 1:25:38 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ArneFufkin
You hit it out of the park, amigo.
32 posted on 05/18/2002 1:26:44 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: goody2shooz
Thanks for posting.
33 posted on 05/18/2002 1:27:24 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
John, thanks from me too for the pings. It's really convienient to catch up on stories after being away for a couple of days. Much obliged!

By the way ... my money is on Hatch.

34 posted on 05/18/2002 1:29:19 AM PDT by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Oh lets see. Republicans might have a Respected Individual who's Not Had A Touch Challange of Holding back his runaway mouth on issues for a while. I might be wrong but I see a possible canidate on the GOP side.
35 posted on 05/18/2002 1:40:36 AM PDT by cva66snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ArneFufkin
By the way ... my money is on Hatch.

Same here.

36 posted on 05/18/2002 1:43:01 AM PDT by cva66snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
One House Democratic aide with knowledge of both the committee's and the president's briefing from Aug. 7

There's a high ranking source. Barney Frank's shampoo boy? If I were an editor, I'd never let information or quotes from an unattributed source make the final copy. If the source won't permit attribution, the information is suspect. The Clinton disinformation machine fed all manner of bullcrap through their agents by "veteran GOP strategists" (David Gergen and Frank Luntz) or "senior official close to Speaker Gingrich" (Dave Bonior) or the tried and true "lawyers familiar with the Independent Council report"(Lanny Davis and Geraldo Rivera).

37 posted on 05/18/2002 1:52:49 AM PDT by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe
Either/Orrin Hatch is currently the favorite at 6 to 5 in the morning line. Edwards is a close runner up at 3 to 1.
38 posted on 05/18/2002 1:57:56 AM PDT by Scuttlebutt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe
Nobody in Sunday Morning News Gab history had more face time, saying less of substance, than did Hatch during the whole IC/Impeachment debacle. What a nattily attired weenie.
39 posted on 05/18/2002 1:58:30 AM PDT by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ArneFufkin
"Nobody in Sunday Morning News Gab history had more face time, saying less of substance, than did Hatch during the whole IC/Impeachment debacle. What a nattily attired weenie."

Actually, when Hatch wants to go on the offensive he can be very effective. During his brief flirtatation with the Presidential primaries last election he was the most effective at painting Gore with the Clinton brush. That's what's so frustrating about Hatch, he could be such a conservative force but he always folds whenever he has to put it on the line. You're probably right, "weenie" is a pretty apt description of ole Orrin when you get right down to it.

40 posted on 05/18/2002 4:32:17 AM PDT by joebuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson