Senate probes source of leak

Washington Times ^ | Saturday, May 18, 2002 | By Audrey Hudson and Stephen Dinan

[Holden Magroin]

My guesses:

1. John Edwards (D-NC). He's running for president - hard - and sits on the Senate Intelligence Committee.

2. James Inhofe (R-OK). He sits on the Senate Intelligence Committee, is up for re-election this year, and is furious with Bush for opposing the Crusader program.

3. Jim Gibbons (R-NV). He sits on the House Intelligence Committee and might be angry with Bush over Yucca Mountain.

[Mo1]

I think this has something to do with Crusader. There's a lot of money tied up in that project, and some of those people don't fight fair

That is possible .. there were a lot of upset people over that

[Mike Darancette]

Senator Dianne Feinstein said on July 1, 2001, on the Wolf Blitzer show that she had been told that a major attack on the United States could be expected in the next three months."

Mrs. Feinstein, California Democrat and Senate committee member, said yesterday [5/17/02] she did not know anything specific, but that her remarks stemmed from a "deep sense of foreboding" that an attack was imminent.

I guess it was the Ghost of Elenor Roosevelt that told Di-Fi.

[Havoc]

"There is really nothing to leak. There is no story to this. The real story is the FBI's failure to provide the president and intelligence community with adequate information," Mr. Shelby said.

the real story is that the Democrats gutted the intelligence agency's budgets for 30 years to the point where they couldn't even properly recruit from top universities and are still running on 80486 computers rather than current systems, etc. The real story is that the defense intelligence agencies don't even have arab speaking agents that can decifer arabic language intelligence information and have been sending raw intelligence to outside agencies for translation. This is the known state of affairs. And the Democrats are directly responsible for it. The Republican party should be out there campaigning on this truth. The Democrats wouldn't have a chance against it.

[bonesmccoy]

treason should be prosecuted. PERIOD.

Taking in the plot of Star Wars...one should go see this great movie... paying special attention to the comments of the characters when discussing the "Senate".

[Grampa Dave]

Have you ever tried to discuss the word Treason, and what it means to a left winger and some third party zealots.

In their mind, there is no such thing as treason. Actions, that you and I would call acts of treason, they see them as just acts of Free Speech and not treason.

If I was running security clearances based on background checks and investigations today, I would never grant even a confidential clearance to a registered demonicRat! That includes every rat senator and congressit in our current congress.