Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Turns More Partisan With Coming of Elections
Washington Post ^ | 05/19/2002 | Dana Milbank

Posted on 05/18/2002 7:49:27 PM PDT by Pokey78

Edited on 09/03/2002 4:50:30 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: Pokey78
Oh I knew it I knew it! Somehow I just knew those wascally Wepublicans would be the first to turn partisan didn't you?
Stoolie Dashole tried so hard to be compassionate too!
21 posted on 05/18/2002 9:02:06 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasJ7
That is a V ERY good observation. Its not the democrat and Dashole and the rest of the partisna jerks, its only Bush according to Dan Milbank - minion #235 of the DNC.
22 posted on 05/18/2002 9:21:10 PM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
"You must win by seizing upon the enemy's disorder and derangement, and by not according him even a little of recovery." - Miyamoto Musashi, A Book of Five Rings,1645.
23 posted on 05/18/2002 9:45:59 PM PDT by PsyOp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: desertcry
These organizations(the liberal media) of traitors have a lot to answer for. - agreed!
24 posted on 05/18/2002 11:40:15 PM PDT by Free_at_last_-2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
Good analysis, however, you failed to mention that the Democrat's money for Gore was reduced by 25% to elect Hillary. The allocation of National Party Funds to Elect Hillary made her Senate Seat the most expensive in history - the Democrats lost the Presidency simply by spending in the wrong place - their strategy is Rodem in '04 and one more.
25 posted on 05/18/2002 11:59:12 PM PDT by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
Nice metaphor.

I hadn't seriously considered whether Bush could get 60 Senate seats. I had mostly figured they were just trying to get back a voting majority- hmmm, but that's thinking like the dems actually. The dems are the ones desperate to hold on to a voting majority in the Senate because it's the only platform they have- except the media, of course- and while the media is a powerful tool to have in one's arsenal it still can't vote on things.

But, yes, I suppose thinking to win big and long term it would make more sense for Bush to push for the big pie. It doesn't hurt if you're unsuccesful (you were campaigning anyway) and if you win you win all the marbles. If Bush succeeds in that endeavor, I suppose he would make a big push over the next two years to win California and New York. With either of those two, he would be unbeatable.

26 posted on 05/19/2002 6:35:28 AM PDT by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
Great analysis! We have got to take back the Senate and if this latest round by the Dems/press hasn't emboldened people to that reality I don't know what will. Seems it may have reunited the bickering ranks of the GOP.

The Dems will stop at nothing. Let's stop then this November!

27 posted on 05/19/2002 7:58:06 AM PDT by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Republicans need only get the truth out there and not let these idiot liberal media hacks/Demonrats get away with their hit pieces.
28 posted on 05/19/2002 7:11:57 PM PDT by bushfamfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson