Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Planned Parenthood concealing crimes? Investigation says sex by men with underage girls 'epidemic'
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Tuesday, May 21, 2002 | By Jon Dougherty

Posted on 05/20/2002 11:36:54 PM PDT by JohnHuang2

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: let freedom sing
"I am FURIOUS that PCPP performs abortions on children and unsuspecting women."

Have you ever read Abortion Practice, Warren Hern's standard abortion manual? He explicitly states that psychologically troubled women looking for an abortion should be refererred to a mental health practitioner ... after the abortion.

21 posted on 05/21/2002 1:37:01 AM PDT by toenail
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I was going to list a few of the listed findings and refute them one at a time, but suffice it to say that once you become comfortable with killing a helpless human being that cant defend itself...Lying about the circumstances that brought it about or concealing it from someone is probably not a problem for anyone involved.

....and you mean to tell me we get up to $500 a pop and government tax dollars to boot??!!??

22 posted on 05/21/2002 2:31:30 AM PDT by Delta 21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drammach
* One clinic worker told the caller

"if she came in with the cash, she could be any age she wanted to be"

23 posted on 05/21/2002 2:34:18 AM PDT by Delta 21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Gteat quote of the day. Thanks for the link. And to the PP article here, PP was NEVER about helping. It is a business to profit off of killing the pre-born baby.
24 posted on 05/21/2002 3:57:48 AM PDT by kassie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2; Drammach; Judith Anne; lavaroise; nickcarraway
1) I can't get very worked up about the rights of parents whose 13 year old daughter is running around having an ongoing sexual relationship with a 22 year old man. Parents who didn't care what their adolescent daughter was doing before PP called them up to tell them, wouldn't care afterwards either.

2) This article's authors and several posters are jumping to the conclusion that what PP tells girls over the phone is all they're going to tell them. You can be sure that PP staff, most of whom are ardent feminists, do not approve in the least of adolescent girls having sex with older men. However, if they start lecturing the girl over the phone, she'll hang up and/or never come in -- this would just drive her back to relying on her "boyfriend" for help, which isn't in anyone's best interests. Once such a girl shows up at PP in person, I have little doubt that she'll get an earful from the counselors there about the inadvisability of such relationships. Most likely, they'd offer to help her in reporting it to the police -- at the very least, they'd plant the idea of that option in her head, for future use, when the relationship cools. If the girl is still adamant that she's "in love" with the creep, she wouldn't cooperate with a police investigation anyway, and the police would likely just drop the matter.

25 posted on 05/21/2002 5:39:22 AM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
You can be sure that PP staff, most of whom are ardent feminists, do not approve in the least of adolescent girls having sex with older men. However, if they start lecturing the girl over the phone, she'll hang up and/or never come in -- this would just drive her back to relying on her "boyfriend" for help, which isn't in anyone's best interests. Once such a girl shows up at PP in person, I have little doubt that she'll get an earful from the counselors there about the inadvisability of such relationships. Most likely, they'd offer to help her in reporting it to the police -- at the very least, they'd plant the idea of that option in her head, for future use, when the relationship cools.

Absolute bollocks. Anyone who even bothers to take a cursory look at PP knows they promote the sexual activity of minors.

Whether endorsing sex education programs that emphasize mixed messages, run websites for teenagers that are sexually oriented, or funding TV ad campaigns, there can be no question what PP's bottom line is.

And the reason is simple. Kids have sex, girls get pregnant, girls run to PP to get an abortion, PP gets more blood money.

Surely you do not have to be a rocket scientist to figure this out?

26 posted on 05/21/2002 6:20:14 AM PDT by Houmatt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
1) I can't get very worked up about the rights of parents whose 13 year old daughter is running around having an ongoing sexual relationship with a 22 year old man. Parents who didn't care what their adolescent daughter was doing before PP called them up to tell them, wouldn't care afterwards either.

For goodness sakes! What about the rapist jurisdiction of the 22 year old who is able to manipulate a child to get screwed - health, money and jurisdictionaly-wise? What about Planned parenthood knowing and hidding the info from parents? Sure, parents' lack of knowledge is no excuse, but let us go after the Fuerers before we go after the little guys. Please.

27 posted on 05/21/2002 6:21:25 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2; all
Wow this sounds just like those undercover stings they do using teens to make alcohol purchases. I don't suppose any law enforcement agencies will be doing that in the near future. Holding my breath....turning blue......
28 posted on 05/21/2002 7:04:41 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gophack
ping
29 posted on 05/21/2002 7:05:17 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
Planned Parenthood was NEVER about helping anyone.

Planned Parenthood was founded for the purpose of lowering the birthrate of minorities.

Dave in Eugene

30 posted on 05/21/2002 7:06:25 AM PDT by Clinging Bitterly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: toenail
You found the answer. What do you propose to do about it that isn't already being done?
31 posted on 05/21/2002 7:52:03 AM PDT by lewislynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
Planned Parenthood was NEVER about helping anyone. I am FURIOUS that they get tax money.

ME TOO!!! That group gets TAX MONEY? That is a travesty.

32 posted on 05/21/2002 7:56:29 AM PDT by Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Under-age girls? Hmmmmmm. More business for PP? </sarcasm off
33 posted on 05/21/2002 10:04:16 AM PDT by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
1) While it is deplorable if the parents of one of these girls aren't more active in their lives, that notwithstanding, 13 year olds are not chattel and have rights independent of their parents.

2)You can be sure that PP staff, most of whom are ardent feminists, do not approve in the least of adolescent girls having sex with older men.

That is jumping to an unwarranted conclusion. Many of the staff at Planned Parenthood may see it as the right of these children to ``control their sexual life,'' and will support anything they are doing that is considered antinomian.

34 posted on 05/21/2002 10:21:16 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
bump

Not surprised to hear this info.

35 posted on 05/21/2002 10:28:36 AM PDT by tutstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Once the kids' parents have abdicated their right to control their kids' activities, I suppose the kids have as much right as anyone to take up the slack. While PP no doubt supports the kids' right to be sexually active in adolescence, the feminist ideology which pervades PP definitely does not espouse older men having their way with young girls.

Have you been following the story of the 13 year old girl killed by a 25 year old man she met on the Internet? Custodial aunt dropped the girl off at the mall, unsupervised, and was apparently accustomed to doing this upon the girl's request. This sort of idiocy isn't PP's fault, and I seriously doubt that this girl's guardian would have changed her policy if she got a call from PP telling her that the girl was pregnant. The girl would have cried and gone to confession and told her aunt she wouldn't do it again, and the aunt would have found it convenient to believe her, and dropped her off at the mall again next time she asked.

36 posted on 05/21/2002 10:47:03 AM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
If you want to shrink government, remember these girls(and their children) will eventually become wards of the state. It's better to prevent this from happening beforehand, even if you don't believe in their rights.

I also think you are behind the times with PP morality. As long as the older man ``does the right thing,'' by bringing her in for an abortion, the PP staff may not see anything wrong with it.

37 posted on 05/21/2002 10:58:20 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt
Absolute bollocks. Anyone who even bothers to take a cursory look at PP knows they promote the sexual activity of minors.

Whether endorsing sex education programs that emphasize mixed messages, run websites for teenagers that are sexually oriented, or funding TV ad campaigns, there can be no question what PP's bottom line is.

And the reason is simple. Kids have sex, girls get pregnant, girls run to PP to get an abortion, PP gets more blood money.

You're right, but I think it goes way beyond money.

PP is part of the "anti-religion" "pro-socialist" agenda. It's not just about making money off abortions. They want to tear down all societal norms in order to rebuild society in their liberal, socialist image.

Take sex. Sex is a wonderful and fun act. We know that. As parents, and as moral God-fearing people, we believe that sex should be reserved for marriage. If you can go out and have sex whenever you want with whomever you want, marriage is diminished. When marriage is diminished, divorce is easier (surprise, surprise, look at the divorce rates!)

By tearing down moral values, diminishing marriage, making "mistakes" (like STD's and babies) relatively easy to fix, sex becomes just something else to do like dancing or football or gymnastics.

In addition, PP intentionally tries to undermine the relationship between children (particularly girls) and their parents by encouraging children to lie to their parents (breaking two commandments there), and by propagating the myth that their parents would make them do something they don't want to do (have the baby) or putting the parents into the adversarial role (we're with you, honey; your parents aren't.)

I could go on and on about this. PP is an evil organization that wants to destroy our society by dividing children from their parents and giving an adult stamp of approval to bad choices our children are making. Not only with having an abortion, but promiscuous sex, lowering sex to a purely physical and not-emotional bond, and changing sex from a life-giving act to a purely selfish act.

Planned Parenthood needs to be exposed and stopped any non-violent way possible. I commend this organization for exposing their evil ways. I hope more parents read this and find ways to teach their children about sex that are more inline with their moral values and the lives they want for their children.

38 posted on 05/21/2002 11:30:36 AM PDT by Gophack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: toenail
LDI's the real deal.

Which is probably why so many of the statists at the NRLC look askance at them.

Thanks very much for the heads up.

39 posted on 05/21/2002 2:53:32 PM PDT by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Askel5
"Which is probably why so many of the statists at the NRLC look askance at them."

The NRLC is good for bill tracking, and nothing else.

Life Dynamics, the Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, and Priests for Life are the only pro-life activist organizations worth supporting.

40 posted on 05/21/2002 2:58:55 PM PDT by toenail
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson