The "no-whites-need-apply" caucus: Pat Buchanan asks, 'Who are they uniting against?'

WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Friday, May 24, 2002 | Pat Buchanan

[thathamiltonwoman]

Pat is right about a lot of things but he sounds hysterical here. A bunch of minorities got together and had dinner. Oh horrors!

[A Vast RightWing Conspirator]

Tell me this, then. Why did Pat add this to his article? It appears to be totally out of joint with the rest of what he was attempting to say.

I probably agree. The main message is - racism or race-based segregation is wrong, no matter who is practicing it.

The secondary message would be that these race caucuses and strategy sessions may have more to do with undermining our country culturally, by promoting a way of life and a form of government typical to today's 3d world. By identifying ideas such as 'individualism', 'liberty' and even 'capitalism' with the white race those who hate white Americans my want to undermine them by attacking 'white ideas' and ideals and replacing them with 3d World concepts such as 'group rights'.

[sneakypete]

With a name like "sneaky"pete, I guess I shouldn't have expected any better.

You are apparantely as ignorant about the non-support army as you are religion,and I am not responsible for your ignorance.

[sneakypete]

Why does WCC come to mind when I read such things?

I don't know. It's your mind,not mine. I don't even know what WCC is.

[rdb3]

The main message is - racism or race-based segregation is wrong, no matter who is practicing it.

Amen to that. But still, what Pat wrote here doesn't flow with the rest of his article. Remember writing assignments (high school of college) where you were penalized for having something inserted into your paper that had nothing to do with the topic of the paper? This is what Pat's guilty of.

I have tried to read it from different angles, yet I can not help but come to the conclusion that his "Third-World ancestry" statement was meant as an insult. It had to be, otherwise it would not have been placed within his article (especially since it has nothing to do with its topic).

Open mouth, insert foot. I agree that this clandestine meeting deserves to be called out, but I take him to task for that needless comment. And he could keep the obligatory "I didn't mean it that way" statement. I subscribe to the philosophy that people say what they mean and mean what they say.

[mac_truck]

..these race caucuses and strategy sessions may have more to do with undermining our country culturally, by promoting a way of life and a form of government typical to today's 3d world.

"The coalition is already testing its collective bargaining power. One recent success involved the farm bill President Bush signed this week . The black and Hispanic caucuses united on the nutrition section, or title, of the bill to get expanded food stamp subsidies, which the black members wanted, and to get the right to food stamps restored for legal immigrants, a priority for Hispanic members." (excerpt from NYT article)

Minority groups organizing to get a bigger piece of the government cheese is undermining our country...lol!

[mac_truck]

Buchanan was simply relaying a story of who, what when and what they said. - Period

Yeah, and I have a bridge...

[mac_truck]

Why Asians are in this picture is anyone's guess.

One word. Immigration.

[William Terrell]

I said I would gladly join a fight against *any* group of hyphenated Americans, because I think the concept is un-American and only forments discord and hard feelings. You should not appeal to me or anyone based on race, but on the fact we are Americans, and these groups are acting contrary to the American Way.

So, you condem this caucus of "ethnic groups" and their desire to form a political alliance against the founding people of the nation? Good.

From your post, I figure you may have misinterpreted my statement, "Now specifically who is formenting a "race war" here?". I was talking about this bevy of "ethnic groups", not you.

When I hear somebody cheer on an attack, or movement toward attack, political or military, on me, I want to know where his interest is sourced. That gives me some indication of the direction of his bias.

[jeremiah]

Thank you for the reply, I will get and read this.

[bok]

So, you condem this caucus of "ethnic groups" and their desire to form a political alliance against the founding people of the nation? Good. From your post, I figure you may have misinterpreted my statement, "Now specifically who is formenting a "race war" here?". I was talking about this bevy of "ethnic groups", not you. When I hear somebody cheer on an attack, or movement toward attack, political or military, on me, I want to know where his interest is sourced. That gives me some indication of the direction of his bias.

Memorial Day race riot breaks out between Hispanics and Blacks Foreshadowing of a rivalry to come in this new demographics shift?