The "no-whites-need-apply" caucus: Pat Buchanan asks, 'Who are they uniting against?'

WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Friday, May 24, 2002 | Pat Buchanan

[Jack Black]

Well maybe we should feel better about all those Asians. Tokyo is a pretty nice place. The rest of Japan is even nicer.

[Justa]

"Many years ago, you had Buchanan type racists writing columns, warning of the dangers of letting too many Irish and German immigrants into the country."

WASPs said letting them in would lead to increased taxes, government-as-caretaker and socialism among other things.

Were they wrong in their predictions?

So, I'll guess marxism is o.k. with you too?

If you like communism so much why don't you at least visit a communist nation? Better yet, move there.

People don't come to America for communism, but for freedom. They find freedom too hard so they use their political power to recreate the despotic regimes they left, only with them as the leaders. Visit any politically active ghetto/barrio and you'll see their ethno-political model in action. Better yet, visit Cuba chump.

[StriperSniper]

all attendees were Democrats, there was lots of talk of a joint looting expedition at the expense of taxpayers.

Well DUH!

[Clemenza]

More racial paranoia from Patsy.

[Varda]

I don't disagree with anything you wrote except how you wrote it. You're right hispanics are a pseudo-race and yet Buchanan is agreeing with the liberals that it is one. Why agree with them that it is? We certainly don't do ourselves any good by acquiescing to the liberal desire for more race based division. As you say "I'm sure many Hispanics don't agree with it." These hispanics may be persuaded to the conservative side if we don't run around telling people who believe that they're white that they're not. When we do we drive those who might agree with us by fear to the waiting liberals.
I'd rather they thought of themselves as American and I reject tribalism as a basis for nationality. America is not based on tribalism. Race-based anything is not good for this country. We are not multi-cultural because we've rejected tribe as a basis for determining who is and who isn't an American. The liberals will never help, it's up to us to reject divison by race.

[Joe Hadenuf]

Yeah, lets just ignore the article and attack Mr. Buchanan. Great strategy, good thinking.

[Joe Hadenuf]

It is time for whites to stand up for their rights, and fight back.

LOL! I am not confident that whites can do this. I say this because many will read this article and turn around and say yeah, Buchanan must be a nazi. Go figure. They read the article and then go after the messenger. I guess thats par for the course today.

[Chi-Town Lady]

AMEN!

[mac_truck]

Pat Buchanan asks, 'Who are they uniting against?'

AmericaUnited: Well, we know who Pat is uniting against... Americans of African, Asian and Hispanic descent.

I noticed that while they called you lots of names for stating this, no one has disputed your comment above.

Give them heck!

[William Terrell]

Yes, and what about the rights of Replicants Mr. Terrell. :-)

Work 'em then eat 'em, I say. Make 'em want to stay on those offworld colonies.

[Joe Hadenuf]

Buchanan indicates the D's hold a racist caucus and you defend them.

Disgusting RINO behavior...

Not only disgusting, but very revealing.

[sweetliberty]

The article isn't about Pat. And in THIS article an excellent and valid point is made. Suppose our kids wanted to have "white proms" or a "white awareness" group. There are any number of parallels to what the various ethnic minorities, most notably blacks, have. The point being made is that it is either racist to have these special groups or it isn't. Personally, I am of the opinion that there is nothing wrong with ethnic pride, white or black, and in a "free" society we should be able to express it. I'm not even sure there is anything wrong with it if some people choose not to associate with members of another race as long as there is no crime committed against anybody. Oh sure, people have to associate in some settings just because of where they happen to be at any given time, but I don't think being exclusionary is necessarily always bad. It is a matter of freedom and choice.

[sweetliberty]

Both of you make excellent points and I don't see them as being necessarily at odds. Seems more to me like 2 sides of the same issue, both accurate assessments.

[Myrddin]

My wife logs crime statistics as part of her dispatching tasks. There is a specific "white - non-hispanic" category and a "white - hispanic" category. Criminal activity by hispanics had previous been lumped into the "white" category to dilute and hide it. I think there is also a "non-white hispanic" version as well. The statisticians are trying to get it right by differentiating between actual race and the label "hispanic".

[Varda]

That's pretty much the way the census does it too. The stats are pretty fresh since this kind of catagorizing didn't start until (I think) 1980. Making hispanics into a race has further problems because of all the different countries that qualify. Among immigrants Argentinians are different from Guatemalans who are different from Puerto Ricans. I would guess their crime stats differ also.

[AmericaUnited]

You accuse Pat Buchanan of being a racist and yet you have no evidence, you're just speaking out of hate.

I don't ? How do you know what I have or don't have? Looks like you're speaking out of complete ignorance. Pat has said enough to damn himself over the years.