Posted on 06/10/2002 4:41:30 PM PDT by Pokey78
A Merlot?
Gee what a coincidence.
Then delegates committed themselves to halving the number of hungry people in the world to 400 million by 2015.We must mobilise political will and resources to move forward at an accelerated pace, he said.the West has failed to provide the political will, and the funds, to back up their promises,
Of the $70 billion (£48billion) spent on development aid worldwide, just $11 billion goes on agriculture
They say "We'll stunt Africa's growth. And Asia has too many folks. Too large is the mouth in the Latin South We'll aid 'em by cuttin' their throats." "No, we must approach as a friend and do our job from within. Let's feed 'em the pill that's made up to kill and make their beginning their end."
Population reduction was all fun and games and something that happened to scrawny Extra people with flies on their faces ... until the West realized what was meant by the fact that "humans are responsible" for greenhouse gases and global warming.
If our coercive "aid as population control" is such a 59 billion dollar failure at "halving the number of Hungry People", what sorts of means for "accelerated pace" may we look forward to watching applied first -- perhaps -- to same?
Will the West's "right to die" (read: obligation to off oneself) catch on as the zenith of Empowerment and pleasing to the almighty Mother Earth who is so ill-equipped to provide for her human children?
whether there is such a thing as the right to food and, if so, how the world can achieve it.Thanks to Western reservations, the draft summit declaration stops short of enshrining such a right, referring not to the right to food but to the need to create the conditions in which a right to food might be recognised. But the debate is under way.
Given the vogue for referring to food and water as "ANH" or "artificial nutrition and hydration" in Western cutting edge euthanasia cases, I think we know how this debate is going to end.
Governments do a rotten job of feeding the hungry.
Let them eat McDonald's food ... just about the same thing.
Their people back home would kill for a Big Mac or a Whopper ... preferably made out of the meat harvested from their leaders.
But they are making more money off of it?
If that staement wasn't so pathetic it would be laughable.
In any event, our land grant schools have had more to do with feeding the world than any UN "World Food Summit".
Back in the seventies, when the socialists like Paul Ehrlich predicted worldwide starvation, our Ag Schools invented and propagated the "Green Revolution". And they could do it again. All it would take is soils irrigated by capitalism and fertilized with freedom.
Zimbabwe, for example, doesn't need Mugabe. It needs Auburn...
Lip smacking treats this crowd ripely deserves.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.