Posted on 06/16/2002 3:34:48 PM PDT by vannrox
I went to MOMA in February, saw the Warhol soup cans. A sloppy copy of someone else's art (the package designer's) gets to be called fine art because of a boorish attempt at mockery, is all I saw. Warhol couldn't even take the time to get the lettering right, which I found insulting (I used to do lettering professionally).
Anyhow, all I could think of while looking at the "Warhol" soup cans was, "What a jerk!"
Try believing in yourself for 50 years or so with little support from the outside world (and a lot of criticism) ...Its harder than it looks.
Museum of Modern Art hangs Matisse’s Le Bateau upside down for 47 days
I loved arguing with with art teachers while in college. I am very pragmatic but have and odd sense of humor I could come up with something weird enough to make them happy.
If you're ever in Pittsburgh, you can safely skip the Warhol. Go the the Aviary or the Phipps Conservatory instead - you'll have a much better time.
You have got that right, Woofie!
Modern art is deconstruction. Each school explored one element to the detriment of others. Impressionists studied light, cubists studied volume etc. Historically, art was comissioned by patrons who supervised the execution to their standards. It was not individual expression. Today, many fine artists work in all kinds of ventures and we are surrounded by their art and it pleases us. The art gallery scene is a cruel hoaz, like all government supported ventures, it seems to me. Often, too, it seems the artists are mocking both critics and viewers.
I’ve seen nothing (recently, since, say, the 1914-1920 era) that I would buy.
And, frankly, I do think my taste is better than that of highly “trained” art critics who praise what an elephant paints with a brush and canvas as “art”....
And yes, while I agree that a Picasso might be expensive, I wouldn’t want any of his stuff in my living room either. Modern designs? FL Wright’s designs are generally just plain and most are not ugly, but unattractive.
Abstracted bump for later
So is it “art” if my ironwork sells a few thousand dollars every month, with each client enjoying his or her custom stairway, rail, ladder, gate, or armillary sphere, recommending my designs to their friends and neighbors?
Who’s more successful? An artist who gets the government to buy his or her sculpture for 25,000.00 once, or a welder who gets 45,000 to 85,000 per year?
!
Mark
Robt., I’ve seen the occasional abstract piece with some aesthetic oomph, but most modern art I find infantile. As for music, I don’t go to concerts anymore, but what I’ve heard on the radio of neoromanticism (or neotonality if you prefer) has had too much minimalism in it for me. Given a choice betwen minimalism and country music, I’d kill myself.
Lord Leighton. Exquisite.
It's helpful to have someone challenge our assumptions about what is and is not good art. I especially enjoyed the point that he made about the spiraling cost of works of modern art. Then again, a fool and his money...
That said, Fred Ross is wrong to say that modern art is solely the province of talentless hacks and deviants.
Take for example the work of Mr. Chuck Close:
Photo of an ugly guy, right? Not really.
It's impossible to see at this resolution, but the portrait is a pencil and airbrush reproduction of a photograph that Chuck Close took of himself in his bathroom mirror.
It's easy to remember "Christ Piss" and forget or fail to discover some of the better artists of the modern age.
.....the so-called Art Establishment plays along with the charade....
Having convinced a world of art investors that the only real value is in the new age art, be it painting or sculpture or even jewelry, the establishment has created a market for gold plated lead.
Geeze, there’s a local estate auction in a few weeks that features 200 “ modern art “ paintings. I have no idea if they’re worth five cents. I’ll be attending for some other items. I wish I knew more about the artists.
.......Remember, those who can’t paint, teach....
I have a different take..... those who like eating regular teach.
There are lots of MFA’s who can’t sell enough to make ends meet. The refuge is the school. They aggregate with others promoting the school and the party line while churning out MFA’s for which there is no hope.
The work can be quite good but the return on the time is inadequate to buy groceries. I once heard the department head ask “What’s the difference between an artist and a Domino’s large pizza? The pizza can feed a family of 4 “
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.