Posted on 09/02/2002 4:36:06 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
Lets remember we are talking about California here.
You know the LEFT coast.
Where all of the NEA loving, we want bigger government, lets mold those little minds to love Che and hate big business liberals hang out.
You know the place where Spielberge and his lesser millionaire Hollywood buddies give big bucks to DemocRats to destroy property rights and write gun grabber legislation.
I dont think our home-schooler friends want to take any chances with the legislature who gave us Electric Deregulation and the Assault Weapons Ban.
Ah. Pitting the unions against the families. California is a state that is at war with its citizens.
Andreoli said, however, that, in his view, the state's concern is that home-schools operating as private schools lack oversight to ensure that children are safe.
If children are not safe in their own homes, then where are they safe? I guess we'll have to erect metal detectors in our front doors and post guards in the foyer.
"She asks the Legislature to consider state authorization, 'conditions' to be placed upon the 'quality of education being offered in a home school' and delineating of 'qualifications or resources that a parent needs' to home-school his child," Smith wrote in a brief last week.
Here's one measure of the "of education being offered in a home school" the state can use: the number of national educations contests won by home-schooled students vs. public-schooled students.
-PJ
a. Home schools can legally operate as private schools in Texas;
b. Article 7, section 2 of the Texas Constitution only authorizes the legislature to establish and maintain public education, not private or parochial education (Leeper, Slip Op. At 10);
c. Home schools must be conducted in a bona fide manner, using a written curriculum consisting of reading, spelling, grammar, math and a course in good citizenship. No other requirements apply.
d. The court ruled that the interpretation of the law cannot be left to each criminal prosecution. "If arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement is to be prevented, laws must provide explicit standards for those who apply them." Slip Op. at 9. Therefore, the court interpreted the law in an explicit way based on the historical treatment of home schooling. "The evidence establishes that from the inception of the first compulsory attendance law in Texas in 1915, it was understood that a school-age child who was being educated in or through the child's home, and in a bona fide manner by the parents was considered a private school ." The dictionary in use in Texas at the time of the passage of the first compulsory attendance law contained definitions of the words "private" and "school" which encompassed children being taught at "home."
Looks pretty good to me. I believe the Texas law was passed as a result of some educrats declaring homeschooling illegal.
Bill Simon's speech on this issue from this morning
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.