Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A hateful conference [Durban]
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | September 4, 2001 | Leader [House Editorial]

Posted on 09/04/2001 7:40:51 AM PDT by xsysmgr

THE United Nations had it coming to it. Last month, Colin Powell, the black American Secretary of State, decided to send only low-level representation to Durban for its World Conference Against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance.

The reason for his decision was the gathering's manifest purpose: a ganging-up against the West and Israel in the form of demands for an apology and reparations for slavery and colonialism, and an indictment of Israel as one of the leading practitioners of racism and ethnic cleansing. Since the meeting began on Friday, Mr Powell's worst fears can only have been confirmed. Yesterday, he announced that the United States was pulling out of Durban after failing to remove "hateful" anti-Israeli language from the conference documents. Israel, which also sent a junior delegation, has followed suit.

Mr Powell's view of the meeting is worth quoting at some length: " I know that you do not combat racism by a conference that produces declarations containing hateful language, some of which is a throwback to the days of 'Zionism equals racism', or supports the idea that we have made too much of the Holocaust or suggests that apartheid exists in Israel or that singles out only one country in the world, Israel, for censure and abuse."

This wretched conference is attempting to set the clock back to before 1991, when the UN General Assembly's resolution on Zionism and racism was repealed. It is putting in the dock Western nations which gave to the world the notion that racism and xenophobia are wrong. That is not to say that they are free of such ills. But it is pretty rich to be publicly pilloried at what purports to be an anti-racism conference by the likes of anti-Semitic Syria and a Zimbabwean regime that seeks to blame all its ills on the white minority and Britain, the old colonial power. The UN thoroughly deserves the disgust it has inspired in Washington and has only itself to blame if it now makes no headway in persuading the Americans to pay their $2.3 billion arrears to its funds.

The British Government, which has rightly resisted demands to apologise for the transatlantic slave trade, is nevertheless staying in Durban to the end. Tomorrow, Angela Eagle, a Home Office minister, will take over the baton from Baroness Amos, her Foreign Office equivalent, who left yesterday. After the hypocritical cant it has had to endure over the past four days, there is no good reason why Britain should stay. Tony Blair should brush aside the wish of Jack Straw, the Foreign Secretary, to maintain representation at all costs, and pull our delegation out. Racism is an evil but the Durban conference is an insane way to confront it.

</BLOCKQUOTE



TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by xsysmgr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
Let me be the first to thank the UN for trumpeting to the world that it is, for the most part, comprised of vicious, stupid, hate-filled, anti-Semitic fascists. They have done in two weeks what millions of freedom-loving Americans could not have done -- shown beyond any argument that the UN is simply a sop to murderous thug regiemes world wide; a bribe to let them live like kings while they starve and kill their own countrymen, to keep them from committing even more atrocities.

"We'll give you millions of dollars and let you play toy Hitler in exchange for your being just a teensy-bit less homocidal and destructive." This may be the grand-daddy of opportunity cost damage management.

2 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr, dennisw, DistantVoice, lent, vrwc54, Thinkin' Gal, RCW2001, linear, STD, A+Bert, Tom_Busch
Bump.
3 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by veronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
"Get the US out of the UN."
4 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by Pete53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
This wretched conference is attempting to set the clock back to before 1991...

Wrong, that should be "1945".

5 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pete53
AND......The UN OUT OF THE U.S.!!!!!
6 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by litehaus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
They've written their own epitaph as far as I'm concerned. The US shouldn't give them another nickle.
7 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
"Get the U.S. out of the U.N." and the U.N. out of the U.S. Brussels would be a good spot for it.
8 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by Truthfairy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
While I don't think this conference was put together for the sole purpose of bashing Israel, it was as good an excuse as any to get the hell out of there. I think the plan all along was to make a point of showing up: "OK, we showed up, we made it here, but now we're leaving. You can't say we didn't show up."

The countries that scream the loudest and shake their fingers at other countries are usually the ones who are the most guilty themselves. Just who the hell do the Zimbabweans think they are, to shake their finger at the U.S.? And the Syrians? Fuggedaboutit!

Oh, I forgot--this is the same U.N. that kicked the U.S. off the Council on Human Rights by secret ballot and rolled out the red carpet for the Sudanese and the Libyans!

Thanks for posting the article. It's nice to know that there are at least some British columnists who haven't gone barking mad.

9 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by wimpycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
Interesting that the Telegraph gives Bush no credit whatsoever (not even a mention!), as if Powell's non-attendence was not Bush's ultimate call.
10 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wimpycat
. It's nice to know that there are at least some British columnists who haven't gone barking mad.

This isn't just a columnist; it's a House Editorial representing the position of The Telegraph.

11 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by xsysmgr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Truthfairy
"Get the U.S. out of the U.N." and the U.N. out of the U.S. Brussels would be a good spot for it.

Siberia would be a good spot for it.

12 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by VoiceOfBruck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
Just thinking this morning........does England, France, or Germqny have a single minority in their administration? Interesting that all these countries have time to point fingers at America.
13 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
They are known as The ToryGraph, you know. When the BBC writes something like this, then you know attitudes have changed.
14 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by mmmmmmmm....... donuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: UN_list

Indexing for the UN_list. Click the silly logo to see the list.

15 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by RippleFire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
The UN has been hijacked by 2 bloc votes. 56 Islamic countries + 44 African countries. 100 out of a total UN membership of 207. When they get together and find 4 more countries (easy when Saudi petrodollars are used) they can win any vote. That's the main reason Israel will always get a raw deal at the UN.
16 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by anapikoros
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
This is a true example of majority rule. MOSTof the governments of the world are are corrupt so therfore they push a corrupt agenda. The 3rd world haslearned well from J. Jackson and company. You can push anything under the guise of racism. Time to part company with the UN.
17 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by oyez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
I notice that a conference on Racism and "related intolerance" makes no reference to the status of females in the Islamic culture. Curious but not suprising.
18 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by joebuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mmmmmmmm....... donuts
They are known as The ToryGraph, you know. When the BBC writes something like this, then you know attitudes have changed.

True. The BBC has an article on the conference, but it is more about the reaction to the US and Isreal's leaving, than on the leaving itself. For a view from the UK left, I posted a Leader [House Editorial] from The Guardian .

It starts out

It is a great shame that the conference - which had such ambitious, bold and noble aims - should have been thus diverted.
and ends
If this UN summit helps by raising individual consciousness, as well as by stirring collective conscience, all may not yet be lost.
Pretty namby-pamby, trying to make something positive out of this fiasco.
19 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by xsysmgr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
The Arabs made a big mistake. They should not have pushed the question of whether or not Zionism is racist. That just raises all kinds of red flags. The question should have been whether the continued occupation of the West Bank and Gaza is racist. It is, and the US could not have walked over that question as easily.

Actually Israel and the US are going after straw men again ... much of the criticism against Israel comes not from Muslim fundamentalists or rabid anti-Semites, as we are led to believe, but from ordinary people the world over who are horrified by Israeli policies and practices. Furthermore, Israel is getting labelled as racist because it meets all the technical requirements for such a label. People generally WANT to support Israel, but have to distance themselves from her bahaviour and actions, which are inexcusable. Furthermore, Israel and the US haven't come up with a single valid counterargument to the criticism levelled at them, instead they literally fled and fell back on their usual defense - drag the gammy corpse of "anti-Semitism" out of the grave and parade it about.

The fact that the US and Israel withdrew from the Conference on Racism only serves to prove that the US and Israel's position on Palestine has become indefensible. Israel's assertion of its "independence," its indifference to the world community is an irony given Jewish history. The American and Israeli delegations should have remained to answer the allegations.

By fleeing the conference they only served to isolate themselves from International opinion. The Bush administration's ability as a world leader and consensus builder is proving to be poor at best. The conference covers an important agenda for the world which will continue to focus international pressure on Israel to address the allegations of racism, and someday there may be sanctions against Israel if their response is deemed unsatisfactory.

By its own charter the United Nations is compelled to take a stand.

20 posted on 09/05/2001 9:20:16 PM PDT by jasowas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson