Skip to comments.
The end of American citizenship
Jewish World Review ^
| September 7, 2001
| Michelle Malkin
Posted on 09/07/2001 9:55:18 AM PDT by sarcasm
I AM the daughter of legal immigrants from the Philippines who proudly chose to become Americans. They stood in line, aced their citizenship tests, filed tons of paperwork, and - speaking in English -- swore allegiance to the United States. The 206-year-old oath my parents took declares, in part:
"I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state or sovereignty
I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic...I will bear arms on behalf of the United States
I take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me G-d."
For millions of naturalized Americans like my parents, the oath of allegiance is sacred. It is a solemn public commitment to embrace and defend American laws and institutions. The rights and responsibilities that accompany this coveted status are earned privileges, not free entitlements. That is why the widespread assault on American citizenship is a grave insult not only to native-born Americans, but also to families like mine who played by the rules to get here - and to stay.
Everywhere you turn, American citizenship is being devalued:
- On the ball field, relatives of America's now-scandal-ridden Little League team from the Bronx waved Dominican Republic flags - not our Stars and Stripes.
- On the Internet, the new Bush White House website unveiled this week includes two versions - one in English, one in Spanish.
- The English-language requirement for naturalized Americans has been gutted, and many ethnic groups are lobbying to drop the oath of allegiance that new Americans have taken for more than two centuries.
- In Amherst, Mass., left-wing locals are once again pushing voting rights for non-U.S. citizens -a trend pioneered in my home county of Montgomery County, Md., where noncitizens in five communities are allowed to vote in local elections, and in Chicago and New York, where noncitizens can vote for school board.
- And on the international scene, Mexican president Vicente Fox challenged President Bush this week to approve a "bilateral migration policy." Translation: Allow illegal Mexican workers to jump ahead of the line while law-abiding immigrants from all other countries patiently wait their turn.
Although Bush has backed away from using the term "amnesty," it is clear that he is toying with the same craven politics of pandering to the illegal alien lobby that the Clinton-Gore administration embraced. In an election-year effort to manufacture new votes, Clinton-Gore launched a "Citizenship USA" campaign in 1996 to expedite naturalization for more than a million aliens. Nearly 200,000 never underwent required fingerprint checks. More than 80,000 had disqualifying criminal records.
The message this sends to families like mine is that we are chumps. Why should we bother to obey the law? Or learn English? Why study American history in order to earn the right to vote if liberal enclaves across the country are going to enfranchise noncitizens - who don't even have to be able to read their ballots in English, let alone name the three branches of government?
Both the movement to naturalize illegal aliens and the drive to give voting rights to legal permanent aliens have a shared target audience: Mexicans. Many have absolutely no intention of assimilating here, but they will gladly take what kowtowing U.S. politicians give them. President Bush, courting Latino leaders, says he simply wants to find a way to "legalize the hard work" of Mexicans who crossed our borders illegally. But illegal aliens from Mexico aren't the only immigrants who do hard work.
Exclusive amnesty for line-jumping Mexicans is a slap in the face to all other immigrants -- from the Korean grocer and Ethiopian restaurateur, to the Indian cab driver, British schoolteacher, and Filipino nurse -- who came through the front door, toil gladly, reject the free-ride mentality, and follow the rule of law.
The founding fathers didn't envision the naturalization process as a means to boost the labor supply or the voting rolls. The ultimate end, the purpose, of granting American citizenship is to help create one people, one nation who share a common allegiance. It is a tragedy that we've now given the enemies of our constitutional republic the keys to flood our gates and trash our home
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
1
posted on
09/07/2001 9:55:18 AM PDT
by
sarcasm
To: dennisw, Franklin1776,Joe Hadenuf, t-shirt, mercuria,Brownie74, Bikers4Bush, FITZ,blam, madrussian,
El ping.
2
posted on
09/07/2001 9:56:25 AM PDT
by
sarcasm
To: sarcasm
The ultimate end, the purpose, of granting American citizenship is to help create one people, one nation who share a common allegiance. ... and the goal of those wanting to water it down is to create the opposite.
A divided people who are easily swayed, easily set at odds, easily defeated and overcome.
That is what is really happening. Despite the use of "useful idiots" proclaiming "social" and "political" and "economic" reasoning ... at it's awful core, that is what this is really all about, the destruction of America.
3
posted on
09/07/2001 10:00:02 AM PDT
by
Jeff Head
To: sarcasm
Our leaders have not read the U. S. Constitution but want to violate it. The citizen you get with these illegal acts will not be proud Americans. This is a shame.
4
posted on
09/07/2001 10:06:38 AM PDT
by
chasII
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: Hail Caesar, Rockinfreakapotamus
El Bumbo grande.
6
posted on
09/07/2001 10:10:09 AM PDT
by
GunsareOK
To: sarcasm
Id just like to ask all the Bushies, I guess ole' Pat Buchanan was right. wasnt he??
To: All-American Medic
I worked very hard last year to get W elected, and I still haven't said anything bad about him despite my privately held opinions. However, in response to your question: I'm going to take the 5th for the time being.
To: sarcasm
Good one. If only we could get 10,000 Americans down to an important border crossing and raise hell with protests and demonstrations. Disrupt business as usual.
9
posted on
09/07/2001 10:40:44 AM PDT
by
dennisw
To: sarcasm
Interestingly, the courts have made it almost impossible to
renounce one's citizenship.
You can stand in the middle of Times Square, with blanket network coverage, and verbally renounce your citizenship; you remain a citizen. You can get a signed and notarized document renouncing your citizenship; you remain a citizen. You can take out a full-page ad in the New York Times renouncing your citizenship; you remain a citizen. You can become a citizen of another country; you remain a citizen.
Just about the only way to lose ones' citizenship is to join the army of a nation at war with the U.S. If the nation whose army you join is not at war (officially) then you will not lose your citizenship.
This is the other side of the coin of cheapening U.S. citizenship...
--Boris
10
posted on
09/07/2001 10:44:11 AM PDT
by
boris
To: dennisw
11
posted on
09/07/2001 10:45:39 AM PDT
by
sarcasm
To: sarcasm
I think the USA should have reciprocal laws with Mexico.
Whatever would happen to me if I illegally immigrated into Mexico, should happen to them here.
If Americans can't own land in Mexico, the same for them here.
If I can never become a citizen of Mexico, .....
You get my point. If President Fox doesn't like this, he can change his country's laws first and we would reciprocate.
12
posted on
09/07/2001 11:14:16 AM PDT
by
A. Patriot
(| || ||| |||| || || ||| || ||||||@slave.NWO.gov)
To: sarcasm
The amnesty of 1986 was the first act that cheapened American citizenship, the upcoming amnesty will destroy its meaning altogether. American citizenship is there for the taking by the criminals. Law of the third-world: prosperity in life comes not as the result of hard work and education, but as the result of a crime.
It's time to make border-crossing a felony. No felon can be naturalized.
To: sarcasm, All-American Medic, GunsareOK, Hail Caesar, Dave Dilegge, Jeff Head, ChasII, VW-Cat-Man
You know, given the gorbasm mess I felt really bad changing my mind at 9pm Monday November 6 and not voting for Bush (especially since I live in a swing state - WV) and was really hoping to see Dubya prove his worth so I could check him off in '04. However, this seals it. "Fuggettabaattit" George! You've never read the Constitution and obviously never will. I didn't vote for his pop in '88 either and only did in '92 'cause of the Kintoon. Byebye GOP - all your fundraising solicitation crap goes into the round file.
To: Rockinfreakapotamus
I'm changing my registration on Tuesday after I cast my last vote in a Republican primary election.
15
posted on
09/07/2001 4:24:31 PM PDT
by
sarcasm
To: sarcasm
I recently moved and changed mine to Indy since Indys can still vote in Rep primaries. Plus, we're undergoing redistricting in the mountain state and the "I" keeps both sides guessing in their gerrymandering games. Plus, Independents are the ones chosen for debate audiences and I'd love the opportunity to ask candidates some choice questions about their [lack of] understanding of the Constitution.
To: sarcasm
A "Remember the Alamo" bump!
17
posted on
09/07/2001 9:13:23 PM PDT
by
varon
To: sarcasm
BRAVO!
18
posted on
09/07/2001 9:16:02 PM PDT
by
Orion78
To: Rockinfreakapotamus
Everyone should register Independant. I always have. So did my father. Just received my new voter card and it now says, under PARTY, PND.....maybe...pary not designated? Makes it sound like you are keeping your party affiliation to yourself!
In Arizona, we too can now vote in Primaries. So if Clinton was a liar and Bush isn't backing himself up, and if everyone is just plain disgusted with OUR leader(s), what better way to make a statement than to launch a
RE-register as an INDEPENDENT
CAMPAIGN. Party differences and debate appear to be a means of diversion, while more important and quite sinister "GLOBALIZATIONAL" decisions and agreements are being made without our consent. Why wait for the next elections. By then all the college graduates will be voting, after 4 years of Environmental Extremist Conditioning. Let's just all tell Washington "we will claim our party when we see somthing worth a damn!" REGISTER INDEPENDENT..........one can always re-claim their party.
19
posted on
09/07/2001 9:55:15 PM PDT
by
madfly
To: sarcasm
I'm also the daughter of a legal immigrant. My mother got a letter from Governor Barry Goldwater when she became a US Citizen. And I remember how hard people tried to learn the language and came here with respect for us and our freedoms.
20
posted on
09/07/2001 10:17:38 PM PDT
by
madfly
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson