Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SEVERAL FR POSTERS [DETECTIVES ] POINT OUT - HOW ONGOING MSNBC SUPREME COURT POLL -IS RIGGED???
MSNBC. com ^ | 9/9/01 | MSNBC

Posted on 09/10/2001 8:24:53 AM PDT by ChaseR

O. K. folks, what we have here is an ongoing MSNBC poll that started yesterday, Sept. 9, 2001.
Many FR posters are - all through this ongoing poll (2 threads thus far) have now made it very clear that this MSNBC is probably rigged.


POLL BEGS 4 FREEPING!: Did the recount decision (Bush vs. Gore)hurt the Supreme Court's credibility?

Here's the MSNBC poll::

Survey Says:
Voice your opinion on these topics. After you’ve voted, you can see how others have responded.

Did the recount decision hurt the Supreme Court's credibility?

I'm undecided.

FR Posters begin to suspect this ongoing poll is rigged:

You must scroll about halfway down the page.The poll is on the left side of the page.

Current poll results:

*
775 responses

No. The ruling was a correct interpretation of the law.
23%

Yes. The court's decision was obviously politically motivated.
75%

I'm undecided.
2%

Let's go to work.
1 Posted on 09/09/2001 10:29:30 PDT by Checkers

To: Checkers
No: 44%

Yes: 55%

Still some FReeping left to do here.
246 Posted on 09/09/2001 13:55:08 PDT by TheGrimReaper

To: ChaseR

New results 55% to 44% (2539 responses).
252 Posted on 09/09/2001 13:56:39 PDT by Bryan

Did the recount decision hurt the Supreme Court's credibility?

* 2793 responses

No. The ruling was a correct interpretation of the law. 45%

Yes. The court's decision was obviously politically motivated. 53%

I'm undecided. 2%
266 Posted on 09/09/2001 14:11:41 PDT by CounterCounterCulture

To: Checkers
Actual post found at:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/cgi-bin/duforum/duboard.cgi?az=list_threads&om=3870&forum=DCForumID5#18

"Tranceformer

(76 posts)

Sep-09-01, 03:23 PM (ET)

17. "It's being freeped like crazy."

Now 58-40 and sliding.

The thoought just occurred to me that an unscrupulous person might create a bunch of Hotmail accounts and maybe set them up so they'd each cast a vote in the chosen direction, not that any of us would stoop to Repugnican voting tactics, of course . . ."

That explains the "yes" votes.
274 Posted on 09/09/2001 17:18:27 PDT by Checkers

To: Checkers
43-55-02
275 Posted on 09/09/2001 17:34:26 PDT by Checkers

To: CounterCounterCulture

* 7601 responses

No. The ruling was a correct interpretation of the law. 43%

Yes. The court's decision was obviously politically motivated. 55%

I'm undecided. 2%
281 Posted on 09/09/2001 19:37:32 PDT by SunnyUsa

To: goldilucky, (when I left here four hours ago the numbers were the same as now 43/55 - -RIGGED!!

As of right now, the poll is still the same as when I left: 43/55
This 43/55 figure was the exact figure that they showed in this (rigged) poll when I left - THAT WAS FOUR HOURS AGO.
gold, obviously MSNBC wants these to be the final numbers...oh well. (deceiving liberal scumbags!)
283 Posted on 09/09/2001 19:58:28 PDT


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

1 posted on 09/10/2001 8:24:53 AM PDT by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Current tally
Did the recount decision hurt the Supreme Court's credibility?
* 14786 responses
No. The ruling was a correct interpretation of the law.
42%
Yes. The court's decision was obviously politically motivated.
56%
I'm undecided.
2%
2 posted on 09/10/2001 8:26:32 AM PDT by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
Fixed?
3 posted on 09/10/2001 8:30:45 AM PDT by BufordP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
Did the recount decision hurt the Supreme Court's credibility?

* 15084 responses

No. The ruling was a correct interpretation of the law.
 42%

Yes. The court's decision was obviously politically motivated.
 56%

I'm undecided.
 2%

4 posted on 09/10/2001 8:31:22 AM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BufordP

5 posted on 09/10/2001 8:31:56 AM PDT by BufordP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
The real question is: How many MSN-NBC internet voters from Palm Beach, Florida meant to vote "No" but accidentally voted "Yes"?
6 posted on 09/10/2001 8:33:22 AM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
In polls on left-leaning sites, I always vote for the left's position. Online polls don't have a hint of accuracy, so I help point that out, skewering the results. The next poll that comes up, I say everybody FReeps it to the left.
7 posted on 09/10/2001 8:34:21 AM PDT by toenail
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Checkers, Bryan
[Ongoing key observations continued:

To: tje
Re:I already voted, unless I can vote again and again and again.

Go to your cookie folder on your hard drive. Probably located at C:\Windows\cookies\ delete the two *.txt files named yourID#@msn[1].txt and yourID#@msnbc[2].txt . The letters "YourID#" will be replaced by your e-mail address. Delete these two *.txt files, restart explorer, cut and paste the link http://www.msnbc.com/news/626039.asp#BODY into your address bar - -
- - and Freep away! 209 Posted on 09/09/2001 16:16:40 PDT by ChadGore

To: petuniasevan Freeped again. There may be some anti-freeps at work, it's went from 45/55 to 44/56.

214 Posted on 09/09/2001 16:35:32 PDT by Brett66

To: Checkers Well, in light of what's going on at Democratic Underground, I suddenly have no reservations about clearing my cookies and voting again.
223 Posted on 09/09/2001 17:35:05 PDT by Bryan

To: Coop This is pretty tough. There have got to be a lot of DU people voting multiple times.
225 Posted on 09/09/2001 17:57:11 PDT by Bryan

To: Bryan

Did the recount decision hurt the Supreme Court's credibility?
* 6576 responses No. The ruling was a correct interpretation of the law. 43%
Yes. The court's decision was obviously politically motivated. 55%
undecided. 2%

Still needs more freeping.
227 Posted on 09/09/2001 18:11:20 PDT by Salvation

To: mountaineer, ChaseR

MSNBC is certainly not known for their honesty. You are so right. We have seen how when we FREEP a Poll it changes big time.

This looks fixed to me.

MSNBC = typical socialist liberal propaganda media machine.
228 Posted on 09/09/2001 18:26:00 PDT by Snow Bunny

To: Snow Bunny
In the past using links from FR on other polls have left a 'cookie' that caused Freeper votes to be expunged.

Using a URL rather than a link on a post may help prevent that from happening.
229 Posted on 09/09/2001 18:34:37 PDT by JulieRNR21

To: petuniasevan FReeped

We're still losing, though. But this is a Newsweak/PMSNBC poll. The article is written by Howard Fineman. Surprise, surprise.
235 Posted on 09/09/2001 19:03:23 PDT by esther2

To: goldilucky We are now up to 7264 responses. Still 55% to 43%.
The DU site is definitely jacking up the "Yes" votes.
237 Posted on 09/09/2001 19:04:53 PDT by Bryan

To: petuniasevan BTTT!!

Thanks for the ping!

Currently - no: 43%; yes: 55%; undecided: 2%; 7352 votes total.
240 Posted on 09/09/2001 19:18:37 PDT by republicandiva

***

Here is are the LATEST TABULATIONS:

Did the recount decision hurt the Supreme Court's credibility?
* 15672 responses

No. The ruling was a correct interpretation of the law.
42%
Yes. The court's decision was obviously politically motivated.
56%
I'm undecided.
2%

8 posted on 09/10/2001 8:41:36 AM PDT by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: toenail
Hahahaha....Can you imagine the hype that's going to come out of the polls if that happens? LOL Media will have a field day with it.
9 posted on 09/10/2001 8:43:41 AM PDT by chemicalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad - THIS MSNBC, ONGOING POLL - IS A ****BIGGIE*** - HOWEVER, WE KNOW IT'S RIGGED!!
voters from Palm Beach, Florida meant to vote "No" but accidentally voted "Yes"?"

rofl

10 posted on 09/10/2001 8:45:02 AM PDT by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: toenail, Chad Gore
"freep it to the left...."

rofl

11 posted on 09/10/2001 8:46:44 AM PDT by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
Actually MSNBC should have added the shape of a butterfly around the voting dots.....
12 posted on 09/10/2001 8:47:24 AM PDT by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66, FOLKS, WATCH AND SEE - MSNBC WILL BE REFERRING TO THIS - RIGGED POLL - FOR MONTHS ON END
bttt
13 posted on 09/10/2001 8:49:09 AM PDT by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: LEISURELY REVIEW HOW FR POSTERS BRYAN and CHECKERS - EXPOSED THIS RIGGED POLL
bttt
14 posted on 09/10/2001 8:52:26 AM PDT by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: FOLKS, THIS MSNBC POLL - CONTINUES AS WE LOOK ON IN AMUSEMEMT (SUSPECT!)
bttt
15 posted on 09/10/2001 8:53:28 AM PDT by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: FOLKS, THIS MSNBC POLL - CONTINUES AS WE LOOK ON IN AMUSEMEMT (SUSPECT!)
bttt
16 posted on 09/10/2001 8:53:29 AM PDT by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
bttt
17 posted on 09/10/2001 8:54:40 AM PDT by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: goldilucky, *** FOLKS, THIS MSNBC POLL - CONTINUES AS WE LOOK ON IN AMUSEMEMT (SUSPECT!)
bttt
18 posted on 09/10/2001 8:55:31 AM PDT by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Snow Bunny, *** FOLKS, THIS MSNBC POLL - CONTINUES AS WE LOOK ON IN AMUSEMEMT (SUSPECT!)
bttt
19 posted on 09/10/2001 8:55:46 AM PDT by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SunnyUSA, *** FOLKS, THIS MSNBC POLL - CONTINUES AS WE LOOK ON IN AMUSEMEMT (SUSPECT!)
bttt
20 posted on 09/10/2001 8:56:18 AM PDT by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson