Posted on 09/12/2001 3:59:11 AM PDT by GretchenEE
Tuesday, September 11, 2001 DAY OF INFAMY 2001 Terrorists slit throats of 2 AA stewardesses Flight attendants 'were trying to stop them from getting inside the cockpit'
By Paul Sperry WASHINGTON -- Terrorists who hijacked American Airlines Flight 11 out of Boston Tuesday morning slit the throats of two female flight attendants who tried to bar them from entering the cockpit, an American Airlines employee told WorldNetDaily in an exclusive interview. The terrorists then forced their way into the locked cockpit and commandeered the Boeing 767 to New York, where they slammed it into one of the World Trade Center towers. The flight, carrying 81 passengers, was bound for Los Angeles. A third stewardess aboard the nine-crew flight used her cell phone to alert another American Airlines stewardess back at Logan Airport about the hijacking and murders. The terrorists were armed with knives and box-cutters. "It was horrific," said the senior American Airlines employee, who works at Logan and said goodbye to the crew at the terminal. "They were trying to stop them from getting inside the cockpit." The plane left the gate at about 7:45 a.m. The cell phone call was placed about 30 minutes later, the source says. The jet crashed into the World Trade Center building at about 8:45 a.m. Soon after, a United Airlines jet sliced through the twin tower. According to the American source, the American captain managed to turn on the cockpit intercom, apparently without the terrorists knowing, allowing flight controllers to pick up cockpit conversation. The terrorists had turned off the plane's transponder, the equipment that identifies the plane and provides other information to flight controllers tracking it by radar. As part of their investigation, FBI agents and Massachusetts state troopers have interviewed American Airlines employees and Logan airport workers, including custodians working the morning shift, to rule out an inside job. ... DEVELOPING ...
If you'd like to sound off on this issue, please take part in the WorldNetDaily poll.
Paul Sperry is Washington bureau chief for WorldNetDaily. |
Everytime an event happens, security, inconvenience and expense gets worse for those of us who just want to get from one place to another. We're the victims.
Train every flight attendant to use arms if necessary and also there could be one "passenger" on each flight who is armed.
End of problem.
Dogs could sniff for potential explosives.
We're not ever going to make this a perfectly safe world.
You mean something like this?
Where will all of this end?
I pray to God that there is still a way for people to find God's Love and come to know His Light and Everlasting Peace...
God is the only answer...
I hate the thought of it, but I think it's only a short time before The USA is hit with nuclear bombs...
I am saddened but I will continue to pray for this world...
This is terrible.
Once guns are compeletely outlawed we will all be safe was what they said. Is it possible that Rather, Browkaw and Jennings could figure it out? Not likely. They will only decry the failure of the defense. They will scream that the people in charge of the defense failed.
They fail to understand that all conflicts are won with offense. The most a defense can do is effect a draw.
For every offense there is a defense that will best it. Fro every defense there is an offense that will best it.
That looks like a stand off, until you understand that offenses are always invented before the defenses that stop them.
The flight attendants did the best they could with what they had. They gave their lives trying to fend off a takeover of the plane. Truly heroic.
Same with most government agencies.
Look at the first response of the FAA. Eliminating curbside baggage checks (Great response, don't you think), random ID checks (really, a winner -- your papers please) and rifling more carry-on baggage (really helpful).
Before you know it, we will have every passenger and flight-crew member subject to a full body-cavity search before boarding. And it won't solve the problem.
But you will have lost more of your freedom.
Didn't they do this for a while back in the 70s and 80s with "sky marshals"?
I was under the impression that it worked, too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.