Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rape used as control in U.S. prisons
National Catholic Reporter ^ | September 14, 2001 | NEVE GORDON

Posted on 09/17/2001 8:38:42 AM PDT by sendtoscott

Viewpoint


Rape used as control in U.S. prisons

By NEVE GORDON

Many prisoners are targeted for sexual exploitation the minute they enter a penal facility; their age, looks, sexual preference and other characteristics mark them as candidates for maltreatment. In a new groundbreaking report, Human Rights Watch documents the widespread prisoner-on-prisoner rape in U.S. men’s prisons. The rights group accuses state authorities of not taking measures to prevent and punish rape and, in many cases, for allowing this cruel form of abuse to persist.

One reads that in extreme incidents prisoners find themselves the “slaves” of their rapists. Forced to satisfy another man’s sexual appetites upon demand, they may also be responsible for washing his clothes, massaging his back, cooking his food and cleaning his cell. They are frequently “rented out” for sex services, sold or even auctioned off to other inmates.

One prisoner from Arkansas wrote to Human Rights Watch: “I had no choice but to submit to being Inmate B’s prison wife. Out of fear for my life, I submitted to [him]. In all reality, I was his slave, as the Officials of the Arkansas Department of Corrections … did absolutely nothing.”

“Rapes are unimaginably vicious and brutal,” writes Joanne Mariner, deputy director of the Americas division of Human Rights Watch, and author of “No Escape: Male Rape in U.S. Prisons.” Gang assaults are not uncommon, and victims may be left beaten, bloody and even dead; they almost always suffer from extreme psychological stress, including nightmares, deep depression, shame and self-hatred, which may lead to suicide. There are also known cases whereby the victim has contracted HIV.

No conclusive national data exists regarding the prevalence of this phenomenon, but the most recent statistical survey, published in the Prison Journal, revealed that 21 percent of inmates in seven Midwestern prisons had experienced at least one episode of pressured or forced sex since being incarcerated, and at least 7 percent had been raped in their facility.

Correctional authorities generally deny that rape is a serious problem. In Human Rights Watch’s survey of all 50 states, not one correctional authority reported abuse rates even approaching those found by the rights group. The authorities’ reluctance to acknowledge the scale of the violation is reflected not only in misleading official statistics, but also in a glaringly inadequate response to incidents of rape.

When an inmate informs an officer he has been threatened with rape or, worse, actually assaulted, his complaint is seldom investigated, and only in rare instances is an inmate protected from further abuse. “U.S. state prisons have failed to take even obvious, basic steps necessary to tackle prison rape,” Mariner writes. “This deliberate indifference has had tragic consequences.”

In the report, one reads of M.R., a Texas inmate who was violently raped and beaten several times over a period of several months by the same prisoner. Fearful for his life, he reported the abuse to the prison authorities, but received no protection. In fact one investigator dismissed the complaint as a “lovers’ quarrel.” Finally one day the rapist showed up in M.R.’s cell and attacked him. M.R. suffered a broken jaw, left collarbone and finger, a dislocated left shoulder, lacerations to his scalp and two major concussions that caused internal bleeding. The rapist was never criminally prosecuted.

Why, one might ask, do prison authorities turn a blind eye to this horrific phenomenon? While Human Rights Watch does not directly deal with this issue, it appears that the authorities’ lack of response is premeditated. Rape is an effective, albeit ruthless, mechanism of inmate control.

By allowing rape to go on, the “correctional” authorities ensure that prisoner violence is contained within the cells. Frustrated prisoners are permitted to release aggression on condition that they direct it against other inmates, not the authorities. That the victims, who comprise as much as 20 percent of 2 million inmates held in U.S. prisons and jail, live in perpetual fear is also conducive to control. Divide and conquer is the name of the game; the fact that it amounts to horrendous violations of human rights does not really interest the prison authorities.

Neve Gordon teaches in the department of politics and government at Ben Gurion University, Israel.

National Catholic Reporter, September 14, 2001


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 09/17/2001 8:38:43 AM PDT by sendtoscott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: day10
No one, even a prisoner, should be subject to rape and violence of this kind. Rape is universally a crime. Forced homosexuality is despicable and beneath even contempt. State tolerated or even sanctioned homosexual rape is no less a crime and surely would have been considered unacceptable cruel and unusual punishment by the Founders. Shame on you for suggesting that homosexual rape in prision is acceptable!
5 posted on 09/17/2001 8:51:41 AM PDT by CatoRenasci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: day10
Because they are people.

Also, people on the OUTSIDE have the right to know that when THEY are sent to prison, justly or unjustly, the sentence they receive is the sentence that is laid down in the LAW, not a sentence of death (ever hear of AIDS?) imposed on them by other prisoners.

6 posted on 09/17/2001 8:54:21 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: day10
Because they are people.

Also, people on the OUTSIDE have the right to know that when THEY are sent to prison, justly or unjustly, the sentence they receive is the sentence that is laid down in the LAW, not a sentence of death (ever hear of AIDS?) imposed on them by other prisoners.

7 posted on 09/17/2001 8:54:45 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: day10
they have rights beacuse the CONSTITUTION says so. any more stupid questions ? We ain't gotta give em any warm and fuzzies but getting raped means we not them answer to God for willingly allowing it,,,,,,Our body,even as prisoners, is GOD's Body.....
8 posted on 09/17/2001 8:55:58 AM PDT by cactusSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sendtoscott
Welcome to the perfect metaphor for government.
9 posted on 09/17/2001 8:56:22 AM PDT by rdww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: day10
And people in prison should have rights because......?

…they're constitutionally guaranteed them so we don't become what we most despise, a totalitarian state.

Amendment VIII: "Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted."

Besides, the days are long gone that most people in jail belonged there. Lately, numerous minor infractions have been given felony status. When people say they're felons or have been in prison, I now have to ask "For What?" before I pass judgement. We are a nation of jailers, it's a growth industry, dontcha know. Can you honestly say you haven't broken some serious laws, or even know what all of them are?

Are you a gun owner? Maybe you should look at this thread: Project Exile Promotes Prison Rape.

You may be surprised what our alphabet agencies have in mind for gun owners. Maybe you should stop empowering them.

10 posted on 09/17/2001 8:57:42 AM PDT by freeeee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: day10
I have hit the "abuse" button on you, for posting in FAVOR of rape. We don't need visitors to FR running across pro-rape perverts.
11 posted on 09/17/2001 8:58:07 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Orual
I have hit the "abuse" button on you, for posting in FAVOR of rape. Only a pervert could be in FAVOR of rape, and we don't need perverts on FR.
12 posted on 09/17/2001 9:00:19 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: day10
And people in prison should have rights because......?

Because our Constitution prohibits cruel and unusual punishment? And because prisoners ought not to be the agents of society's law enforcement and judicial system?

13 posted on 09/17/2001 9:00:27 AM PDT by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Orual
I have hit the "abuse" button on you, for posting in FAVOR of rape. Only a pervert could be in FAVOR of rape, and we don't need perverts on FR.
14 posted on 09/17/2001 9:00:56 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: day10
Because we're a civilized people. At least most of us are.
16 posted on 09/17/2001 9:01:56 AM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: day10
>>>And people in prison should have rights because......?<<<

Because we are not animals and refuse to allow anyone else to be treated as such.

If that doesn't work for you, try this: prisoners who are victimized in prison are more violent upon release. And they will be released. And they might target your loved ones when you aren't around to protect them because of it.

Close enough to home yet?

How about this one, people who speak out against the government tend to end up in prison, even in this country.

Close enough to home yet?

18 posted on 09/17/2001 9:03:20 AM PDT by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: day10
And people in prison should have rights because......?

Because this isn't China. Even though the inmates are in prison for violating the law, laws must still be obeyed in handing out their punishment. Ever hear of the Bill of Rights? There is an Amendment that mentions that "cruel and unusual punishment" is not allowed. I think gang rape and transmission of AIDS to fall within "cruel and unusual".

19 posted on 09/17/2001 9:03:25 AM PDT by FormerLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: day10
Anyone who thinks prison rape is 'okay' is saying that the state should supply sex slaves to the most violent criminals.

(I'd recommend you try thinking before posting but I've learned not to waste my time.)

20 posted on 09/17/2001 9:04:15 AM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson