Posted on 10/03/2001 8:18:28 AM PDT by liberalism=failure
What I truly don't get is why the left wing whackos would support the terrorists and company. Yes, it would be despicable if the libkooks supported Castro killing our people, but it would be, at least on some level, understandable. Because they would be supporting a fellow comrade.
But the Taliban, et al, represents everything the left claims to be against. Intolerance? These guys are the very picture of religious intolerance, they want to wipe out every non-muslim on the planet, it doesn't get more intolerant than that. They also force women to wear vails. I wonder how that syncs up with the liberal "do it if it feels good" liberate our sexuality mindset? And they're a theocratic state, isn't that supposed to be a liberal's greatest fear?
Yet in spite of all that the libkooks support the terrorists more than their own country. I guess that's the answer as to why. These people hate their own country SO MUCH that they will ally themselves with any enemy of it.
Orwell, I believe, said that pacifism (In World War II) was "objectively pro-fascist" well I think it is clear now that pacifism is objectively pro-terrorist. As Bush said you're either for us or against us, and these neomarxist traitors are with them, not us.
It's the same old story. OBL and al Qaeda attacked American capitalism.
They're all totalitarians who hate freedom.
"Why do you like Clinton?"
"Well, I think he did a good job, the economy was good under him, and I just like him."
"You like Clinton even though he had all those FBI files? (point out that those FBI files are reminiscent of Nixon)
Then, go on to mention serial adultery, Buddhist Temple fundraising, obstruction of justice, and impeachment.
The final response will be "Yeah, but I still like the guy, and I think he did a good job."
This is the typical mindset of a lot of people. Or, if you mention the particulars, and avoid Monica, (after all, the impeachment was just about sex) the Clinton lover will not want to hear it.
It's also the anti-American angle. I'm afraid their first reaction is that anyone who kills 7,000 Americans must belong to a politically correct group.
As long as the terrorists continue to hit politically correct targets, these illusions are likely to persist. After all, you could ask similar questions about leftist reactions to the situation in Sudan. How come the leftists, including many prominent black leftists, support Arabs killing and enslaving their fellow blacks, who are normally considered to be a prime victim group? Because the Sudanese blacks are said to be Christians, and anyone who kills Christians must have his heart in the right place, according to this way of thinking. After all, Christians are oppressors.
It's pretty sick, but there it is.
Remember the left applauded wildly when Khomeini overthrew the Shah of Iran.
(Though they won't admit this now.)
The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
Why would American womens rights groups, who blast the US for women not gaining the right to vote until the 20th century, support communism where NOBODY is allowed to vote?
The list could go on forever.
One of the amazing things about the far left's embrace of the anti-American ideology of some in the Middle East is their willful blindness about what these fanatics actually believe in. Susan Sontag, for example, is a Jew. Does she honestly believe that America is responsible for more evil than a bunch of Muslim fanatics who would gas her in a second if they could? Could any gay person seriously argue for appeasement of people who would execute them on the spot if they lived under their rule? Could any serious feminist not believe in opposing fanatics who would eviscerate the slightest shred of freedom for women? I just don't get it. Liberals of all people should be the most serious about fighting this scourge. Is their hatred of America that deep? As to bin Laden's vicious anti-Semitism, check the PBS interview out. Here are my choice excerpts from the Goebbels of Afghanistan:
"The enmity between us and the Jews goes far back in time and is deep rooted. There is no question that war between the two of us is inevitable ... The leaders in America and in other countries as well have fallen victim to Jewish Zionist blackmail ... Once again, I have to stress the necessity of focusing on the Americans and the Jews for they represent the spearhead with which the members of our religion have been slaughtered. Any effort directed against America and the Jews yields positive and direct results - Allah willing ... We do not have to differentiate between military or civilian. As far as we are concerned, they are all targets, and this is what the fatwah says ... We believe that this administration represents Israel inside America. Take the sensitive ministries such as the Ministry of Exterior and the Ministry of Defense and the CIA, you will find that the Jews have the upper hand in them."This isn't like Nazism. In its pathological, paranoid hatred of the Jews, it is Nazism. And these guys want to appease it again?
Well, he concentrated on the anti-semitic aspects there, but you could just as easily rattle on about women's rights or about the Taliban executing homosexuals by bulldozing brick walls onto them. The far left doesn't want to let any of this intrude into their own solipsistic reality, however. They don't want to let anything dilute their hatred of white patriarchal capitalist America.
Yeah I agree 100%. there's this template among the Marxists that says if a group is a minority it is therefore "oppressed" and the majority is "oppressing" it, regardless of what the facts say (i.e. that most Israelis would be happy to coexist with Muslims, whereas most most Palestinians want the totally annihilation and or expulsion of all Jews).
As long as the terrorists continue to hit politically correct targets, these illusions are likely to persist.
Once again you nailed it. All these hate-America liberals on TV can ever talk about is "have and have nots". They don't get this hasn't got squat to do with money, it has to with religious fanatacism and racial/religious hatred of nonmuslims. Bin Laden is a multimillionaire, he doesn't want money. He hates all nonmuslims and wants them exterminated, he is a an Arab Hitler, yet the libs want to creat a fantasy world around him, turning him into a fighter for their cause of fixing inequality. What ridiculous fools.
Once again we have the Marxist template--"oppressed" groups (minorities) and their leaders only behave badly because they don't have money.
What America stands for is rejected by the Libs. It's plain to me that they've worked to destroy it for over a hundred years. I beleive that they feel they have an expedient ally in fundamentalist Islam.
Does she honestly believe that America is responsible for more evil than a bunch of Muslim fanatics who would gas her in a second if they could?
On a smaller scale this is reminscent of Mia Farrow (SP?) standing to applaud CLinton after he was caught with Lewinsky, even though she was a so angry at a husband who did much the same.
As mentioned by others here, the hypocrisy angle. The liberal ability to exempt themselves from their own standards is quite amazing. Hypocrisy is a human failing, that many can fall prey to, but for liberals hypocrisy is their entire existence.
But then that is why Marxism/communism never works, because while the proponents are more than willing to volunteer others to it most are not willing to subject themselves to it. Hence the extreme authoritarianism needed to bind it together, hence the hypocritical elitism of those in control of it, and hence the murderousness that inevitably follows.
And I despise the ideals of Bin Laden et al... but since when is someones (a country's) religion Muslim as example of being oppressive to women-any of our business.
Are we to tell Saudi to change and let women be like Hillary? It is a religion and none of our business.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.