Posted on 10/08/2001 12:53:45 AM PDT by Centurion2000
Previous article : Second Anthrax case in FL. CDC, FBI on scene. Bush notified
Second positive test for anthrax foun
Just spoke with the NEWS desk at WPEC NEWS 12 newsdesk ... here is what they know. They HAVE CONFIRMED that the second individual has TESTED POSITIVE for Anthrax in a nasal swab test so that he has been exposed.
He is being treated with antibiotics
They are testing the building.
The number at the office is 1-800-310-WPEC. You can confirm it yourself by pressing option 2 at the prompt.
Officials: Tests Show Presence of Anthrax in Second Florida Man
By Amanda Riddle Associated Press Writer
Published: Oct 8, 2001
BOCA RATON, Fla. (AP) - Preliminary tests show the presence of anthrax in a second Florida man, but it was not yet clear if he has a full-blown case of the disease that killed one of his co-workers last week, officials said early Monday. A nasal swab from the man, whose name was not immediately made public, tested positive for the bacteria that causes anthrax, said Tim O'Conner, regional spokesman for the Florida Department of Health. (REST OF ARTICLE SEE LINK)
Additional confirmation at AP, CNN, Palm Beach County News
Thread one was geting too long.
Forget about fixing the world, were talking about just surviving here. We need to PRAY HARD, because I believe that this is only the beginning of terrorist attacks against the USA. Good night fellow freepers, and God bless everyone of you. (including you dbbeebs)
One sample can be grown into twenty glass mason jars full of active spores, which can then be passed out to terrorists in a cell for use against subways and buildings.
The glass jars can be used like "biological hand grenades" against air ducts or simply thrown onto subway tracks, where the trains will pull the air, and the spores, through the system.
The possibility of this type of attack is very real, more at the "boxcutter" level of "K.I.S.S.", as opposed to cropdusters etc.
THis is most likely a Poisson distrbution of exposure meaning that it isn't unusual for someone close (both spacially and temporally) to the initially infected to also be infected. Kind of like busses: the next arriving bus has the highest probability of arriving right after the previous one.
Think about how you get the disease: most likely the first victim got from livestock feces (shoes kicked it up). The same shoes wore worn to work. He has the opportunity to infect everyone he worked with.
I know everyone here wants to panic and I'm throwing cold water on it, but you need to take a step back. A terror attack of 200 pounds of Anthrax would kill 3 million people on the east coast. If this really were an attack thousands would have symptons within the first 3 days, not 2.
No actually it seems like you're smoking crack and denying reality here. Pulmonary anthrax is RARE .....
All of a sudden two cases pop up ?
Expect the case loads to go higher bud. Occam's Razor will cut this argument to pieces and time will tell.
Or, as others have suggested, these cases may have been a real-world test by the terrorists, to see how potent and transmissible their spores were. If only two or three cases appear, the test can be judged a failure, since the terrorists were likely hoping to infect half of the building.
Just my speculation.
I do expect it to go higher, simply because we are looking for it. We found spores in someone temporally and spacially related to an initial victim. Don't cut yourself on the razor. THese are related cases. I would be much more concerned if two totally unrelated cases showed up. It's not even clear that the second person has developed the disease. The disease has a source. They were looking for a source. The fact that they found a source shouldn't be the cause for panic. again, if this were an attack, thousands would be dying from the disease. 200 pounds can kill 3 million people.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.