Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Concealed-weapon backers try again
The Plain Dealer ^ | 08 October 2001 | Julie Carr Smyth

Posted on 10/08/2001 3:46:35 PM PDT by Deadeye Division

Concealed-weapon backers try again

10/08/01

Julie Carr Smyth
Plain Dealer Bureau

Columbus

- Amended concealed weapons legislation due out this week would ease a fingerprinting requirement, step up a training component and give working and retired law enforcement officers more latitude with their weapons.

Legislators who favor allowing Ohioans to carry concealed handguns have grappled for months on a compromise that would please both Second Amendment purists and police agencies. Gun control advocates have testified consistently against the concept.

State Rep. Ann Womer Benjamin, the Aurora Republican who chairs a subcommittee assigned to the issue, said a substitute bill being finalized for a hearing on Wednesday addresses the key concerns.

The new legislation will recommend that residents who have lived in the state for less than four years undergo electronic fingerprinting "of not more than four fingers" as a way to establish identity, Womer Benjamin said.

National Instant Check System will conduct criminal background checks, which do not require fingerprinting, she said. Residents who have lived in the state for more than four years will be able to forgo fingerprinting with written certification from a local sheriff or police chief.

"I can't say how it will be received, but we have tried to make it as minimally intrusive as possible," she said.

Participating in a shooting competition is eliminated as a way to satisfy the bill's training requirement, and hunting licenses would only count when held for three consecutive years.

The new language also makes concessions to law enforcement, whose backing Gov. Bob Taft said is critical for his support.

But key police organizations will remain opposed, said Sen. Eric Fingerhut.

"There is nothing in this bill that would change the governor's mind," he said. "What you have is a compromise among people who all agree that the ban on concealed weapons should be repealed." It allows working peace officers to carry their guns when off duty. It also extends that privilege to retired peace and corrections officers and federal agents who were in good employment standing when they retired.

Cleveland police do not support the bill.

It also would disallow carrying concealed weapons on college campuses and at private establishments where an owner chooses to ban them. People would be able to leave a loaded gun in their locked car, she said.

Contact Julie Carr Smyth at:
jsmyth@plaind.com, 800-228-8272


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Ohioans for Concealed Carry

www.ofcc.net

1 posted on 10/08/2001 3:46:35 PM PDT by Deadeye Division
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Bang_list
Bang
2 posted on 10/08/2001 3:47:16 PM PDT by Deadeye Division
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deadeye Division
I still see the government in the peoples way to be armed.Does anyone need to have a background check for the right to have FREE SPEECH!What is the differrence between the two rights.A right is a right and the government is in our way and thats NOT their job!Their job is to secure our Constitutional rights or we will!Be American and stand up for the Founders that lost their lives to SAVE YOU!
3 posted on 10/08/2001 4:04:19 PM PDT by taxtruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deadeye Division
a compromise that would please both Second Amendment purists

Second Amendment purists do not believe in concealed handgun licenses. What part of "...the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" allows for any compromise? Or for that matter what part of "The people have the right to bear arms for their defense and security" from the Ohio Constitution. I don't see any "except concealed" after "bear arms" in either of those restrictions on government.

4 posted on 10/08/2001 4:21:24 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deadeye Division
Proposition - Citizens with Concealed Carry Licenses are deputized for homeland defense.
5 posted on 10/08/2001 4:23:54 PM PDT by Lexington Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson