Not advising the defendent of the charges against him is an avenue of appeal. Not allowing him to confront witnesses is an avenue of appeal. Not allowing him to answer to the charges communicated in closing argument is an avenue of appeal.
Every time the judge overules and objection or makes clear taht no more objections will be tolerated he sets himself up for appeal. Every legal determination that prejudices the case is subject to appeal.
Trump has a right of appeal from a final judgment. Always.
This trial was filled with legal errors and direct palpable violations of rights. Dirshowitz has commented on this and suggested Trump should not waste his time on the intermediate level Court of Apeals which will be a waste of time as it has already been and instea go directly to the COA for the State. The Judge cannot somehow wall off appeal on his violations of the US Constitution or his exceeing his jurisdiction [e..g blowing right by the statute of limitations; and, trying a federal crime in his state court]. This article must be garbage.
They are pardoning themselves for their conspiracy to interfere in a presidential campaign and their violations of the Civil Rights, not just of Trump, but all of us.
Well maybe you Estonians should not have poked sticks at the bear, and should have been thankful that you were members of NATO and just left it at that. But no, you want western nuclewar war with Russia provoked by your legally incompetent imbecile Biden in the White Hut sur running DC sewer.
RINOS are only bad when they are stabbing you in the back, which seems to be all of the time. Otherwise they’re just a bunch of good ‘ol’ boys, if you’re into boys.
Coffee does taste great which is one reason I drink it, but I have to say that the decaf process also takes out a lot of flavor. Even high end stuff is like meh.
Just a riff on your ant capitalist thing. Can’t imagine anything more capitalistic than tourists paying lots of money for a vacation cruise on a really expensive ship with food, booze and entertainment.
I still stand with the credit card not being liable.
That's not the point. Both the merchant and the seller agree to terms in using the credit card to use the credit card company to arbitrate disputes, which credit card companies do do. I have been on both sides. I have disputed fraudulent charges where a service was provided in a city I never visited and the credit card company agreed. I have also had someone try to dispute a charge for a service that they received. I had full documentation of the transaction and the provision of the service and won that one too.
Credit card companies are good at it for the most part beause they see it all every day.