05/31/2024 10:17:46 AM PDT
· 49 of 50 lepton
to FroggyTheGremlim
The boxes under the table were clearly the ones packed moments before - you can match up the sticker patterns like a fingerprint. Using that as an example weakens the other arguments.
As for running the ballots through multiple times, there is a process for resetting after a jam, which is the explanation given, however you can see her running some batches through without going through the reset process.
05/31/2024 9:43:16 AM PDT
· 46 of 50 lepton
to ConservativeWarrior
If he has to go through appeals, then the overturn will be years. If they can get SCOTUS to rule on whether there actually was a trial, that might be quicker.
I have followed one other FR thread with over 500 comments and still haven’t found out what the other crime was. Which one/ones of the underlying crimes did the jury say he committed?
The other crime was never specified, as the law is open-ended. The judge accepted the DAs argument that he did not have to specify, and the DA only made any claim at all during closing arguments after the defense could no longer speak. By the Constitution it has to be specified before the trial.
Add in failure to present the elements of the charges before the trial, not allowing significant advance notice of who the next witnesses were going to be, and that silliness of the jurors not having to agree on the predicate crime.