Free Republic

I want to send a message to the Trump Campaign “HOW TO FIND EVIDENCE OF ELECTION FRAUD” in a way that gets their attention. See below.

To do that, from the comfort of my own home, I’m having the above infographic printed on a 33′ × 80′ vinyl X Banner by a printshop in a more GOP friendly county nearby and having it delivered next day to;

Trump 2020 Campaign,
Fort Myer Drive,
Rosslyn, Arlington,
VA 22209.

I suspect that a six foot tall physical message (with lots of pretty self-explanatory pictures and text) is not as easy to ignore as a letter, email, Tweet or blog post.

But I really want to drive the message home. Which means volume – I need many people sending the same message.

So I’m asking for help.

Do *not* send me any money; just download the image (link – it’s lifesize), find a printshop online that can deliver next day to Arlington, upload the file, and have your banner delivered to the Trump Campaign HQ, to the RNC, to the GOP’s offices in MI, PA, GA, WI, AZ and NV.

Bottomline; we need to let them – the President included – know that we expect them to expend every effort to uncover, expose and undo this theft. And that not going to happen by losing case after case in court.

COL Phil Waldron (USA Ret.) – an Information Warfare Specialist, said this at the GOP Pennsylvania Senate Policy Committee Public Hearing on 2020 Election Issues & Irregularities on November 25 in Gettysburg, PA;

(01:20:34)
One suggestion, whoever does the analysis, is using paper and *ink analysis* of the *micro photo spectrometer.* That would *analyze the ink on those ballots* to see if they were mass produced.

They need to get a hold to the ballots and examine them. They need to convince some judges to order access to the ballots and Trump needs to immediately send in the Marshals to secure them … before someone gets the bright idea of setting the buildings on fire.

Excellent work!

But there needs to be a next step to this Project; an Audit, with forensic analysis, i.e. forensic document/*ink* analysis and spectrophotometry. That’s the next step to prove that this election was rigged. The only thing difficult about it is getting physical access to the ballots in the locales that have already been identified, which can be litigated swiftly if a preservation order is gotten from a judge.

Spectrophotometry is used to analyze inks on documents; I’d bet anything that if we check the mail-in and absentee ballots, particularly those with votes only in the Presidential race, we’ll find thousands of ballots marked by the same inks/pens. Ballot-stuffers needing to deliver 20,000 votes will not change pens after every ballot, and neither will the more efficient cheats using printers and photocopiers change toners after every run.

High end spectrophotometers are, at most, just a few thousand dollars, and many can scan multiple samples at the same time and output results in seconds.

The point being; hundreds or thousands of absentee and mail-in ballots - purportedly by different individuals in different households - all marked by chemically identical pens is impossible. Pen/ink manufacturers deliberately use markedly different compounds to make their products and nowadays include markers to indicate year of manufacture.

So a Papermate pen made in 2019 is easily distinguishable from another of the exact same brand and model made in 2020. There are also differences in batches of pens even if made in the same year. Even more, two pens of the same brand, year and batch could end up very different chemically based on age, storage conditions, etc.

And even with in-person voting at the polls where pens (of the same brand and batch) are purportedly given to all, you can find fraud if in-person ballots from two different precincts have the exact same pen chemical signature. It is almost impossible that not only did two precincts buy pens of the same brand, they bought the same model, the same year, and the same batch.

Ballots marked by printer i.e. HP InkJet, ink, is another major fraud sign on its own.

This is as close to ironclad proof of fraud as we can get. We just need access to the ballots.

So just declare defeat and go home, then?

What’s wrong with seeking the evidence *and* calling out the State Legislatures?

Go to this page for fax numbers to the RNC. eg;
       (202) 863 8820 : (RNC Chairman - Mike Duncan)

If you have any numbers, e-mail addresses or any other way to contact members of the McCain/Palin team, especially any of the higher-ups, please don't hesitate to use them. Money is not the only way to contribute to a campaign; an idea you have that you share may make all the difference. Keep in mind that just a few tweaks can make even a phenomenally bad idea a brilliant one, and brilliant idea even better.

TO:              Steve Schmidt - McCain/Palin 2008

CC:              Robert "Mike" Duncan - Republican National Committee

SUBJECT:      FANNIE MAE & FREDDIE MAC

Sir,

Congratulations on the successful launch of the first step of the McCain/Palin effort to properly hold Senator Obama and the rest of his fellow Democrats accountable for their protection Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and their role in jeopardizing the American economy. Again note that I am referring to it as only a first step.

To make this truly effective, Senator McCain, Governor Palin, the rest of McCain/Palin campaign and the RNC must follow-through, starting tonight at the debate in Nashville. The following are my suggestions on how to do that;

1. Senator McCain should bring up the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac matter repeatedly (don't wait for someone else to bring it up) and hit Obama (and his fellow Democrats) hard during today's debate and the debate afterward. Tell of the contributions, and of his work for ACORN suing Citibank for rightfully not giving loans to people who could not pay them back, i.e. Buycks-Roberson v. Citibank Fed. Sav. Bank Fair Housing/Lending/Insurance^#1 Attach his name to Fannie Mae CEOs Jim Johnson (who he gave the task of picking his VP) and Franklin Raines (his self-admitted adviser on housing issues, according to the Washington Post). Tell the whole world about the accounting scandals at Fannie and Freddie. About the $122000 hush money he got from Fannie Mae executives, second only to Chris Dodd^#2. Rinse and repeat. It will never get old.
        IMPORTANT NOTE: If Obama tomorrow tries the "same as Bush on the economy" canard at any point in time, pointedly remind him that the Bush Administration issued warnings on the need to deal with the risks posed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac every year from 2001 to 2007,^#3 and tried to bring Fannie and Freddie under control under a new Agency in the HUD in 2003^#4 but Senate Democrats blocked it.
   

2. Be prepared for the "Rick Davis" dodge from Obama during any debate where McCain brings Fannie Mae up. The proper response is for Senator McCain is to focus on Obama's friends, Jim Johnson (who he put in charge of his VP selection committee) and Franklin Raines (who the Washington Post reported before the crisis as one of Obama's advisers - isn't it convenient that Obama is denying him now?), who were the CEOs of Fannie Mae, the architects in charge of the sub-prime disaster who were funneling money to Democrats in Congress to continue keeping them free of proper regulatory oversight. McCain should literally ask if Obama is really going to "insult the intelligence of the American people" by trying to draw an equivalence in culpabilty between Rick Davis, a hired advocate, and Jim Johnson/Franklin Raines?
        IMPORTANT NOTE: John McCain should not forget to highlight the fact that it is on record that he sponsored, along with his fellow Republicans, Senators Dole, Sununu and Hagel, legislation to bring Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac under control in 2005 - and while every Republican on the Senate Banking Committee when it came up voted for it, every single Democrat on the Committee voted against it.^#5
   

3. Not one single McCain/Palin surrogate should fail to mention the Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac issue on the talk shows and on the stump from now until Election Day. Even if the talk show hosts don't bring it up, let them do so unbidden. Democrats are as close to a 100% responsible for this mess as it gets. The talking point to counter their "deregulation" nonsense is that, strangely enough, the Democrats actively prevented Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from being properly regulated even after it was revealed that they were cooking the books in multiple investigations. Why? Because they were essentially being paid off i.e Chris Dodd, Barney "Roll the Dice" Frank et al.
        IMPORTANT NOTE: Unleash Sarah Palin on this - at rallies, Press Conferences and any further interviews. Make up for not letting her injure Joe Biden with this issue during the debate.
   

4. Ads; the McCain campaign and the RNC (what's all that money for, anyway?) should blanket the air waves with them - that's the only way to beat back the conventional wisdom being pushed by the Democrats and their friends in the Press blaming Republicans for this mess. You need not have multiple Congressional Democrats in one ad. It's even better if you can have one for each (just to draw it out and emphasize how deep the corruption went), with the money he/she got from Fannie Mae and his/her 'D' highlighted and enlarged for all to see. Jim Johnson proudly calling the Democrats/Obama Campaign "family" appearing in each ad would be great - call the series "Family Business ... You're Paying For It."
        Intersperse all this with detailing the Bush Administration's 2003 effort to rein the GSEs in and the Hagel-McCain-Sununu-Dole 2005 effort to bring Fannie and Freddie to order. All blocked/filibustered by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac's Democratic Congressional protectors. Run Senator McCain's speech on the Senate floor on behalf of this legislation. Run these all through to Election Day - this will do wonders for down-ticket races.
   

5. Make sure to pound out a daily message of how a McCain Administration will never allow anything like this to happen again. Announce plans to reform, restructure and even shut down the GSEs if necessary. Announce modifications a McCain Administration would push going forward to make the $700 billion rescue bill less of a burden on the taxpayer. Announce that win or lose, Senator McCain will push for the appointment of a Special Counsel to investigate into what happened and how come Dodd and co. could always be counted on to shield Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from necessary scrutiny.

I believe you certainly do not need me to inform you that this is no time for half-measures.

Good luck, Sir.

Sincerely, Martin A. Knight

---

1. http://www.mediacircus.com/2008/10/obama-sued-citibank-under-cra-to-force-it-to-make-bad-loans/
2. http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2008/09/update-fannie-mae-and-freddie.html
3. http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2008/09/20080919-15.html
4. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E06E3D6123BF932A2575AC0A9659C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all
4. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122212948811465427.html

.

You could be right. It might be better if I split it into a series. Wouldn't seem like such hard work.

Thanks.

That's why I made sure to highlight my definition of swift-boating.

Need there be any Writers Guild involvement?

Personally, if I were in charge of the RNC, I would seriously consider hitting up on some of our donors, getting some GOP writing talent, advertize for Republican actors and direct money towards producing a pilot episode.

Heck ... I think FOX would be happy to give it whirl. After all, the Democrats got to have The West Wing ...

But this is all a fantasy ... Republicans suck at PR.

Not that I really care ... but that's fine. Whatever floats your boat.

It's a free country, after all. Ain't it grand?

Not that I really care ... but that's fine. Whatever floats your boat.

It's a free country, after all. Ain't it grand?

I've been registered here for a VERY long time and I posted regularly back then for over two years.

Look it up.

Real life intruded and I stopped for a while.

Are you impressed now?

Let them try ... They'll have a hard time getting the public to buy that. They'll not be able to publicly accuse the soldiers featured of lying, and if they can't they'll not be able to accuse them of "politicizing" anything, though they'll try ...

The Right's response? "Why do the Democrats want to silence the troops?"