06/02/2024 1:17:35 PM PDT
· 2 of 10 maro
to Navy Patriot
Carter doesn’t get it. Clark can make all the players richer by expanding the TV audience. If Carter continues this behavior, there will be more severe punishment.
06/02/2024 4:44:02 AM PDT
· 34 of 37 maro
to griswold3
I would argue that the other crime has to be evidenced by a conviction. But even if that is not true, the prosecution has to prove to 12 jurors that the defendant intended to commit the crime. A vague intent to commit some crime is not sufficient.
06/02/2024 4:43:55 AM PDT
· 33 of 37 maro
to griswold3
I would argue that the other crime has to be evidenced by a conviction. But even if that is not true, the prosecution has to prove to 12 jurors that the defendant intended to commit the crime. A vague intent to commit some crime is not sufficient.
06/02/2024 4:43:43 AM PDT
· 32 of 37 maro
to griswold3
I would argue that the other crime has to be evidenced by a conviction. But even if that is not true, the prosecution has to prove to 12 jurors that the defendant intended to commit the crime. A vague intent to commit some crime is not sufficient.
06/02/2024 4:43:38 AM PDT
· 31 of 37 maro
to griswold3
I would argue that the other crime has to be evidenced by a conviction. But even if that is not true, the prosecution has to prove to 12 jurors that the defendant intended to commit the crime. A vague intent to commit some crime is not sufficient.
Agree. The existence of a predicate crime is either a question of law or fact. If a question of law, it should not have gone to a jury until all elements of the predicate crime have been elements. But a NY judge has no competence to tell when a federal crime has been committed. And the judge refused to allow the expert witness that the defense offered. Then, is the predicate crime a question of fact? Only if some other tribunal has held that Trump committed the crime. And we all know that the FEC passed on that prosecution.
05/31/2024 1:19:36 PM PDT
· 7 of 27 maro
to Billthedrill
The cost of the SMR will drop once in production. Nuclear is the only technology with a chance of meeting carbon reduction targets, assuming one is worried about that.
05/29/2024 12:52:18 PM PDT
· 207 of 240 maro
to CraigEsq
I’m talking about 12 alleged crimes that are the predicate for the violation of NY law that is the reason for the trial. Of course, 12 is a hypothetical, since only 3 predicate crimes have been alleged in the case, as I understand it.
05/29/2024 11:58:23 AM PDT
· 194 of 240 maro
to CraigEsq
Think about what you are saying. Let’s say there are 12 charges. Each juror thinks that one and only one of the twelve charges is valid against the defendant. But each juror chooses a different charge. So, even though each of the charges fails on a 11 to 1 vote, according to you, the defendant is guilty of derivative crime.
05/29/2024 8:31:18 AM PDT
· 16 of 240 maro
to janetjanet998
These instructions are truly absurd. First, Trump has to be convicted of a predicate crime before the NY case can proceed. Even if that is not true, there has to be unanimity on what the jurors perceive as the predicate crime. If 4 jurors think that Trump is guilty of a predicate crime, that means 8 jurors disagree.