11/02/2015 5:00:37 AM PST
· 5 of 30 SCHROLL
to GIdget2004
It isn’t the donors who are worried it’s the leftwing hacks like Politics who are. They see Cruz gaining in the polls without burning through campaign cash and realize that money can be spent later against the Den nnominee.
10/06/2015 2:25:32 PM PDT
· 28 of 42 SCHROLL
to stephenjohnbanker
We didn’t do a damn thing. We didn’t decide to break the law knowing the possible consequences. We didn’t destroy families with an out of wedlock birthrate birthrate near 75%. We didn’t decide education wasn’t important. We didn’t own or import slaves either.
Nope Jebster that shouldn’t happen. It’s amnesty for the so called dreamers and a pathway for their parents, siblings not born here, and other relatives to get citizenship through family reunification.
08/31/2015 8:06:56 PM PDT
· 47 of 95 SCHROLL
to Helicondelta
Just further proof Jeb will say and do anything to prevent amnesty from being stopped. Ask the idiot how the foundation of a house is built on unlevel land and how that is any different in building a foundation for a wall?
Pataki listen up. The wall? It’s already law, build it. Deporting those here illegally? It’s the law, do it. Keeping those here illegally from getting jobs? Again, it’s the law enforce it. A candidate who flat out refuses to do these things? Forget it.
Here’s what needs to be done to end illegal immigration-enforcement of current law, adoption of Senator Jacob’s (author of the citizenship clause) defination of the scope and intent as to who is under the juristiction of the US and qualifies for citizenship under law, reinstatement and expansion of the 287G program to allow local law enforcement to act as a force multiplier for ICE, and an Article V adoption of a ban on block and blanket amnesty in any form.
Hey Yoo read the author of the citizenship clause’s own words and get back to me. His defination of scope to it’s intent flies in the face of the crap both you and the courts are selling.
08/18/2015 7:53:08 PM PDT
· 60 of 104 SCHROLL
to Conscience of a Conservative
You disagree with him because you can’t comprehend the fact that birthright citizenship is a creation of the Supreme Court rather than having been instituted by the 14th Amendment which it wasn’t. Levin quoted the man who wrote the specific provolision. He laid out exactly who it covered and who it didn’t. It did not cover foreign nationals or their children born here. Why is that so difficult for you to understand?
Yes he was until some one pulled him to the side and explained to him just what importing all those third world leftists would mean to the Democrat Party.
There was no conflict until the court became involved. If you listened to the first hour of Levin today he read verbatum the author of the citizenship porvision of the 14th Amendment.If it didn not cover the Indians or any one else not under the juristiction of the US government (the illegals) there is no case to be made for birthright citzenship for noncitizens