Julio Severoâs original article is a lovely little hit piece attacking the Catholic Church. Whereas there is much to rue about the Church, the article is clearly intended to undermine the Churchâs prestige and authority. One scarcely expects a complete discussion of such a massive and complex organization, but Olavo is correct in pointing out that Severoâs article lacks balance and nuance. It is for this that Olavo rightly calls Severo a ‘scoundrel.’
In objecting to the scoundrel sobriquet Severo astonished on two counts. First, he kindly links to his own original article but provides no link to Olavoâs Facebook response. By failing to do so Severo weakens his own argument, namely, that he is being vilely maligned by Olavo. The second is Severoâs furiously overblown response to being called a scoundrel, which far exceeds the severity of the offense, if indeed such a mild appellation can be deemed offensive in todayâs unremarked gutter speak discourse. He is making a mountain out of a mole hill.
Why? It is so transparently contrived that it calls Severoâs honesty into question. Iâm going to put this one down to virtue signaling designed to silence Olavoâs criticism of the original agitprop.
For more information on the issue of infiltration and the Catholic Church receiving government money, see:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=yyeejjX7lmU
For more info on Communism today, see:
tercalivre.com/en/ and www.jrnyquist.com/